Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilense
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/26671 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to quantify the inoculation effect of Azospirillum brasilense (Ab-V5 and Ab-V6 strains) on the forage yield, biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), and urea-15N recovery of the forage grass 'Coastcross-1'. The experiment was carried out in a 2 (with or without inoculation) × 2 (without N fertilizer and with 100 kg ha-1 N per year as urea) × 7 (cuts) factorial arrangement. The natural 15N abundance method was used to determine BNF; to determine urea-N recovery, 15N-labeled urea was applied in microplots. Forage yield was higher in grasses subjected to inoculation, with 7.4 Mg ha-1 dry matter per year, for the treatment without N fertilizer, and 8.0 Mg ha-1 dry matter per year for the treatment with 100 kg ha-1 N per year, respectively, which shows an additive effect of inoculation and N fertilization. The contribution of BNF was 23.0 and 53.8 kg ha-1 per year for the unfertilized treatment, both in uninoculated and inoculated plants, respectively. Urea-15N recovery was 13.7 and 16.5 kg ha-1 per year for uninoculated and inoculated treatments, respectively, corresponding to 13.7 and 16.5% of the urea-N applied. Inoculation with A. brasilense increases forage yield and the contribution of BNF to grass nutrition with N, as well as urea-N recovery by the forage grass. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_3bb5f968bd71fb0d31f558d1d31d0aab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/26671 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilenseFixação biológica de nitrogênio e recuperação de N-ureia em pastagem de 'Coastcross-1' tratada com Azospirillum brasilenseCynodon dactylon; forage yield; natural abundance of 15NCynodon dactylon; produção de forragem; abundância natural de 15NThe objective of this work was to quantify the inoculation effect of Azospirillum brasilense (Ab-V5 and Ab-V6 strains) on the forage yield, biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), and urea-15N recovery of the forage grass 'Coastcross-1'. The experiment was carried out in a 2 (with or without inoculation) × 2 (without N fertilizer and with 100 kg ha-1 N per year as urea) × 7 (cuts) factorial arrangement. The natural 15N abundance method was used to determine BNF; to determine urea-N recovery, 15N-labeled urea was applied in microplots. Forage yield was higher in grasses subjected to inoculation, with 7.4 Mg ha-1 dry matter per year, for the treatment without N fertilizer, and 8.0 Mg ha-1 dry matter per year for the treatment with 100 kg ha-1 N per year, respectively, which shows an additive effect of inoculation and N fertilization. The contribution of BNF was 23.0 and 53.8 kg ha-1 per year for the unfertilized treatment, both in uninoculated and inoculated plants, respectively. Urea-15N recovery was 13.7 and 16.5 kg ha-1 per year for uninoculated and inoculated treatments, respectively, corresponding to 13.7 and 16.5% of the urea-N applied. Inoculation with A. brasilense increases forage yield and the contribution of BNF to grass nutrition with N, as well as urea-N recovery by the forage grass.O objetivo deste trabalho foi quantificar o efeito da inoculação de Azospirillum brasilense (estirpes Ab-V5 e Ab-V6) na produção de forragem, na fixação biológica de nitrogênio (FBN) e na recuperação de 15N-ureia pela gramínea forrageira 'Coastcross-1'. O experimento foi feito em arranjo fatorial 2 (com e sem inoculação) × 2 (sem fertilização nitrogenada e com 100 kg ha-1 de N por ano, na forma de ureia) × 7 (cortes). O método da abundância natural de 15N foi utilizado para determinar a FBN; para a recuperação de N-ureia, aplicou-se 15N-ureia marcada em microparcelas. As produções de forragem foram maiores nas gramíneas com inoculação, com 7,4 Mg ha-1 de matéria seca por ano, no tratamento sem N fertilizante, e 8,0 Mg ha-1 de matéria seca por ano no tratamento com 100 kg ha-1 de N por ano, o que mostra o efeito aditivo da inoculação e da fertilização nitrogenada. A contribuição da FBN foi de 23,0 e 53,8 kg ha-1 por ano para o tratamento sem fertilização de N, tanto nas plantas sem inoculação como naquelas com inoculação, respectivamente. A recuperação de 15N-ureia foi de 13,7 e 16,5 kg ha-1 por ano, para os tratamentos sem e com inoculação, respectivamente, o que corresponde a 13,7 e 16,5% do N-ureia aplicado. A inoculação com A. brasilense aumenta a produção de forragem e a contribuição da FBN para a nutrição nitrogenada de 'Coastcross-1', assim como a recuperação de N-ureia pela gramínea.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes)Aguirre, Priscila FlôresGiacomini, Sandro JoséOlivo, Clair JorgeBratz, Vinicius FelipeQuatrin, Maurício PaseSchaefer, Gilmar Luiz2020-03-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/26671Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; V.55, Jan./Dec., 2020: Publicação contínua em volume anual; e01242Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; V.55, Jan./Dec., 2020: Publicação contínua em volume anual; e012421678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/26671/14586Direitos autorais 2020 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-18T18:26:38Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/26671Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2022-05-18T18:26:38Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilense Fixação biológica de nitrogênio e recuperação de N-ureia em pastagem de 'Coastcross-1' tratada com Azospirillum brasilense |
title |
Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilense |
spellingShingle |
Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilense Aguirre, Priscila Flôres Cynodon dactylon; forage yield; natural abundance of 15N Cynodon dactylon; produção de forragem; abundância natural de 15N |
title_short |
Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilense |
title_full |
Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilense |
title_fullStr |
Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilense |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilense |
title_sort |
Biological nitrogen fixation and urea-N recovery in 'Coastcross-1' pasture treated with Azospirillum brasilense |
author |
Aguirre, Priscila Flôres |
author_facet |
Aguirre, Priscila Flôres Giacomini, Sandro José Olivo, Clair Jorge Bratz, Vinicius Felipe Quatrin, Maurício Pase Schaefer, Gilmar Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Giacomini, Sandro José Olivo, Clair Jorge Bratz, Vinicius Felipe Quatrin, Maurício Pase Schaefer, Gilmar Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aguirre, Priscila Flôres Giacomini, Sandro José Olivo, Clair Jorge Bratz, Vinicius Felipe Quatrin, Maurício Pase Schaefer, Gilmar Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cynodon dactylon; forage yield; natural abundance of 15N Cynodon dactylon; produção de forragem; abundância natural de 15N |
topic |
Cynodon dactylon; forage yield; natural abundance of 15N Cynodon dactylon; produção de forragem; abundância natural de 15N |
description |
The objective of this work was to quantify the inoculation effect of Azospirillum brasilense (Ab-V5 and Ab-V6 strains) on the forage yield, biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), and urea-15N recovery of the forage grass 'Coastcross-1'. The experiment was carried out in a 2 (with or without inoculation) × 2 (without N fertilizer and with 100 kg ha-1 N per year as urea) × 7 (cuts) factorial arrangement. The natural 15N abundance method was used to determine BNF; to determine urea-N recovery, 15N-labeled urea was applied in microplots. Forage yield was higher in grasses subjected to inoculation, with 7.4 Mg ha-1 dry matter per year, for the treatment without N fertilizer, and 8.0 Mg ha-1 dry matter per year for the treatment with 100 kg ha-1 N per year, respectively, which shows an additive effect of inoculation and N fertilization. The contribution of BNF was 23.0 and 53.8 kg ha-1 per year for the unfertilized treatment, both in uninoculated and inoculated plants, respectively. Urea-15N recovery was 13.7 and 16.5 kg ha-1 per year for uninoculated and inoculated treatments, respectively, corresponding to 13.7 and 16.5% of the urea-N applied. Inoculation with A. brasilense increases forage yield and the contribution of BNF to grass nutrition with N, as well as urea-N recovery by the forage grass. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-17 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/26671 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/26671 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/26671/14586 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; V.55, Jan./Dec., 2020: Publicação contínua em volume anual; e01242 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; V.55, Jan./Dec., 2020: Publicação contínua em volume anual; e01242 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416672960315392 |