Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrata
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/27152 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate air layering, cutting, and grafting, with different indolebutyric acid (IBA) rates, for the vegetative propagation of Eugenia involucrata. Air layering was carried out for two consecutive years with five different IBA rates. Cutting was tested for woody and herbaceous cuttings, using four IBA rates, in three seasons. The grafting methods – cleft graft and splice graft – were tested in two seasons. For the air layering, cutting, and grafting trials the experimental designs were randomized complete blocks, completely randomized in a 3x4 factorial arrangement, and completely randomized, respectively. Plants were evaluated for rooting, survival percentage, and shoot development. In air layering, low rooting rates of 0 to 50% were observed, the use of IBA showed no consistent results, and no resulting propagules survived after being transplanted. The cutting technique showed low survival, rooting, and leaf retention rates, with no consistent effect of IBA rates. Grafting showed 35 to 50% graft fixation, with no significant difference between the splice and cleft grafting techniques. The air layering and cutting techniques are not efficient for the propagation of E. involucrata, as they do not favor the survival and rooting of seedlings. Grafting, by both techniques, is the most efficient method for E. involucrata propagation. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_44de144711a37aa8ebe0b1fac367f7f1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/27152 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrataMultiplicação vegetativa da espécie Eugenia involucrata, nativa da Mata AtlânticaMyrtaceae; cherry of the Rio Grande; cutting; grafting; air layering; vegetative propagationMyrtaceae; cereja-do-Rio-Grande; estaquia; enxertia, alporquia; propagação vegetativaThe objective of this work was to evaluate air layering, cutting, and grafting, with different indolebutyric acid (IBA) rates, for the vegetative propagation of Eugenia involucrata. Air layering was carried out for two consecutive years with five different IBA rates. Cutting was tested for woody and herbaceous cuttings, using four IBA rates, in three seasons. The grafting methods – cleft graft and splice graft – were tested in two seasons. For the air layering, cutting, and grafting trials the experimental designs were randomized complete blocks, completely randomized in a 3x4 factorial arrangement, and completely randomized, respectively. Plants were evaluated for rooting, survival percentage, and shoot development. In air layering, low rooting rates of 0 to 50% were observed, the use of IBA showed no consistent results, and no resulting propagules survived after being transplanted. The cutting technique showed low survival, rooting, and leaf retention rates, with no consistent effect of IBA rates. Grafting showed 35 to 50% graft fixation, with no significant difference between the splice and cleft grafting techniques. The air layering and cutting techniques are not efficient for the propagation of E. involucrata, as they do not favor the survival and rooting of seedlings. Grafting, by both techniques, is the most efficient method for E. involucrata propagation.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a alporquia, a estaquia e a enxertia, com diferentes doses de ácido indolbutírico (AIB), para a propagação vegetativa de Eugenia involucrata. A alporquia foi realizada por dois anos consecutivos, com cinco diferentes doses de AIB. A estaquia foi testada com estacas lenhosas e herbáceas, quatro doses de AIB, em três estações do ano. Os métodos de enxertia – garfagem em fenda cheia e inglês simples – foram avaliados em duas estações do ano. Para os ensaios de alporquia, estaquia e enxertia, os delineamentos experimentais foram em blocos ao acaso, inteiramente casualizado em arranjo fatorial 3x4 e inteiramente casualizado, respectivamente. As plantas foram avaliadas quanto ao enraizamento, à percentagem de sobrevivência e ao desenvolvimento da parte aérea. Na alporquia, foram observadas baixas taxas de enraizamento foram observadas na alporquia de 0 a 50%, o uso de AIB não apresentou resultados consistentes e nenhum propágulo resultante sobreviveu após o transplante. A técnica de estaquia mostrou baixas taxas de sobrevivência, enraizamento e retenção foliar, sem efeito consistente das doses de AIB. A enxertia mostrou de 35 a 50% de fixação do enxerto, sem diferença significativa entre as técnicas de enxerto de emenda e de fenda. As técnicas de alporquia e estaquia não são eficientes para a propagação de E. involucrata, pois não favorecem a sobrevivência e o enraizamento das mudas. A enxertia, por ambos os métodos, é a técnica mais eficiente para a propagação de E. involucrata.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes, Code 001)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp, process n.º 2014/12606-3)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes, Código 001)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp, processo n.º 2014/12606-3)Santoro, Marcelo BrossiBrogio, Bruna do AmaralForte, Mariane JeronimoSoares, Márcio Rezende RibeiroCollusso, Gabriel TornisieloJacomino, Angelo PedroSilva, Simone Rodrigues da2022-11-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/27152Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; V.57, Jan./Dec., 2022: Publicação contínua em volume anual; e02921Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; V.57, Jan./Dec., 2022: Publicação contínua em volume anual; e029211678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/27152/15096Direitos autorais 2022 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-23T13:40:22Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/27152Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2023-01-23T13:40:22Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrata Multiplicação vegetativa da espécie Eugenia involucrata, nativa da Mata Atlântica |
title |
Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrata |
spellingShingle |
Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrata Santoro, Marcelo Brossi Myrtaceae; cherry of the Rio Grande; cutting; grafting; air layering; vegetative propagation Myrtaceae; cereja-do-Rio-Grande; estaquia; enxertia, alporquia; propagação vegetativa |
title_short |
Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrata |
title_full |
Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrata |
title_fullStr |
Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrata |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrata |
title_sort |
Vegetative multiplication of the Atlantic Rainforest species Eugenia involucrata |
author |
Santoro, Marcelo Brossi |
author_facet |
Santoro, Marcelo Brossi Brogio, Bruna do Amaral Forte, Mariane Jeronimo Soares, Márcio Rezende Ribeiro Collusso, Gabriel Tornisielo Jacomino, Angelo Pedro Silva, Simone Rodrigues da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Brogio, Bruna do Amaral Forte, Mariane Jeronimo Soares, Márcio Rezende Ribeiro Collusso, Gabriel Tornisielo Jacomino, Angelo Pedro Silva, Simone Rodrigues da |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes, Code 001) Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp, process n.º 2014/12606-3) Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes, Código 001) Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp, processo n.º 2014/12606-3) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santoro, Marcelo Brossi Brogio, Bruna do Amaral Forte, Mariane Jeronimo Soares, Márcio Rezende Ribeiro Collusso, Gabriel Tornisielo Jacomino, Angelo Pedro Silva, Simone Rodrigues da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Myrtaceae; cherry of the Rio Grande; cutting; grafting; air layering; vegetative propagation Myrtaceae; cereja-do-Rio-Grande; estaquia; enxertia, alporquia; propagação vegetativa |
topic |
Myrtaceae; cherry of the Rio Grande; cutting; grafting; air layering; vegetative propagation Myrtaceae; cereja-do-Rio-Grande; estaquia; enxertia, alporquia; propagação vegetativa |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate air layering, cutting, and grafting, with different indolebutyric acid (IBA) rates, for the vegetative propagation of Eugenia involucrata. Air layering was carried out for two consecutive years with five different IBA rates. Cutting was tested for woody and herbaceous cuttings, using four IBA rates, in three seasons. The grafting methods – cleft graft and splice graft – were tested in two seasons. For the air layering, cutting, and grafting trials the experimental designs were randomized complete blocks, completely randomized in a 3x4 factorial arrangement, and completely randomized, respectively. Plants were evaluated for rooting, survival percentage, and shoot development. In air layering, low rooting rates of 0 to 50% were observed, the use of IBA showed no consistent results, and no resulting propagules survived after being transplanted. The cutting technique showed low survival, rooting, and leaf retention rates, with no consistent effect of IBA rates. Grafting showed 35 to 50% graft fixation, with no significant difference between the splice and cleft grafting techniques. The air layering and cutting techniques are not efficient for the propagation of E. involucrata, as they do not favor the survival and rooting of seedlings. Grafting, by both techniques, is the most efficient method for E. involucrata propagation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/27152 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/27152 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/27152/15096 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2022 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2022 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; V.57, Jan./Dec., 2022: Publicação contínua em volume anual; e02921 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; V.57, Jan./Dec., 2022: Publicação contínua em volume anual; e02921 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416676840046592 |