Suckling management and its influence on kids and does

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bellaver, Cláudio
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Nunes, José Ferreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15579
Resumo: The effects of continuous suckle in pen and range and controlled suckle twice a day with kids separated from dams were evaluated during the dry and rainy seasons of 1978 and 1979 respectively. The kidding weight of 2.17 kg for those born in dry season influenced by season were significantly (P<0.05) greater than those born during the rainy season 1.69 kg. The weaning weight of 13.65 kg of continuously suckled kids was greater (P <0.05) than those suckled twice a day, 11.41 kg, within the rainy season group. These two weights were statistically superior (P<0.05) to 8.71 and 8.62 kg of weaning weight shown for animals suckled continuously and twice a day respectively, within the dry season. But no difference (P>0.05) was found between them within the dry season. The postpartum estrus interval for does was shorter due to kids management. It was concluded that there is no advantage in leaving the kids with their dam continuously during the dry season.
id EMBRAPA-4_4554fb23473f2ced88f5e9726f851b16
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15579
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Suckling management and its influence on kids and doesManejo da amamentação e suas influências sobre cabritos e cabrasgoats; weaning; growingcaprino; desmame; crescimentoThe effects of continuous suckle in pen and range and controlled suckle twice a day with kids separated from dams were evaluated during the dry and rainy seasons of 1978 and 1979 respectively. The kidding weight of 2.17 kg for those born in dry season influenced by season were significantly (P<0.05) greater than those born during the rainy season 1.69 kg. The weaning weight of 13.65 kg of continuously suckled kids was greater (P <0.05) than those suckled twice a day, 11.41 kg, within the rainy season group. These two weights were statistically superior (P<0.05) to 8.71 and 8.62 kg of weaning weight shown for animals suckled continuously and twice a day respectively, within the dry season. But no difference (P>0.05) was found between them within the dry season. The postpartum estrus interval for does was shorter due to kids management. It was concluded that there is no advantage in leaving the kids with their dam continuously during the dry season.Durante as estações seca de 1978 e chuvosa de 1979, foram avaliados em caprinos os efeitos de amamentações contínuas, pelo acompanhamento do cabrito a campo, e amamentação restrita, por acesso ao leite apenas duas vezes por dia, com separação do cabrito em piquete anexo. Influenciado pela estação, o peso ao nascer dos cabritos nascidos na estação seca foi de 2,17 kg, significativamente maior (P<0,05) do que o pese de 1,69kg para animais nascidos na estação chuvosa. O peso ao desmame - de 13,65 kg dos animais amamentados continuamente - foi superior (P<0,05) ao de 11,41 kg dos animais amamentados duas vezes ao dia, sendo que ambos os grupos nasceram na estação chuvosa. Esses dois pesos foram significativamente maiores (P<0,05) do que 8,71 kg e 8,62 kg referente a animais nascidos na estação seca amamentados continuamente e duas vezes por dia, respectivamente, muito embora não diferiram entre si (P>0,05). Houve uma tendência de as cabras diminuirem o intervalo do parto ao primeiro estro pós-parto, influenciadas pelo manejo do cabrito. Foi concluído que não há vantagem em deixar os cabritos lactantes acompanharem suas mães no campo durante a estação seca.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraBellaver, CláudioNunes, José Ferreira2014-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15579Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.17, n.1, jan. 1982; 157-161Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.17, n.1, jan. 1982; 157-1611678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15579/9566info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-15T19:45:19Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15579Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-15T19:45:19Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Suckling management and its influence on kids and does
Manejo da amamentação e suas influências sobre cabritos e cabras
title Suckling management and its influence on kids and does
spellingShingle Suckling management and its influence on kids and does
Bellaver, Cláudio
goats; weaning; growing
caprino; desmame; crescimento
title_short Suckling management and its influence on kids and does
title_full Suckling management and its influence on kids and does
title_fullStr Suckling management and its influence on kids and does
title_full_unstemmed Suckling management and its influence on kids and does
title_sort Suckling management and its influence on kids and does
author Bellaver, Cláudio
author_facet Bellaver, Cláudio
Nunes, José Ferreira
author_role author
author2 Nunes, José Ferreira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bellaver, Cláudio
Nunes, José Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv goats; weaning; growing
caprino; desmame; crescimento
topic goats; weaning; growing
caprino; desmame; crescimento
description The effects of continuous suckle in pen and range and controlled suckle twice a day with kids separated from dams were evaluated during the dry and rainy seasons of 1978 and 1979 respectively. The kidding weight of 2.17 kg for those born in dry season influenced by season were significantly (P<0.05) greater than those born during the rainy season 1.69 kg. The weaning weight of 13.65 kg of continuously suckled kids was greater (P <0.05) than those suckled twice a day, 11.41 kg, within the rainy season group. These two weights were statistically superior (P<0.05) to 8.71 and 8.62 kg of weaning weight shown for animals suckled continuously and twice a day respectively, within the dry season. But no difference (P>0.05) was found between them within the dry season. The postpartum estrus interval for does was shorter due to kids management. It was concluded that there is no advantage in leaving the kids with their dam continuously during the dry season.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15579
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15579
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15579/9566
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.17, n.1, jan. 1982; 157-161
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.17, n.1, jan. 1982; 157-161
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416673656569856