Pruning dates and productivity of cassava
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/10747 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to assess different pruning dates on the development, production and quality of cassava roots. Two experiments were carried out in two regions of the state of São Paulo, Brazil: Botucatu, on clay soil, and São Manuel, on sandy soil. The experiments were carried out from September 2008 to June 2010, and harvest was done after two growing seasons (22 months). The experimental design was a randomized block design, with four replicates. Ten treatments, nine monthly pruning dates, between April and December, and a control cultivated without pruning were evaluated. Pruning dates were statistically analyzed by orthogonal contrasts, in comparison to the control, and by regression. Cassava pruning during the rest period does not alter dry matter content and root yield. However, when performed at the end of the first cycle or after the start of the second cycle, pruning reduces dry matter content and root yield. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_4fedaa88f1ae37fcfd48d2a6b9fb510f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/10747 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pruning dates and productivity of cassavaÉpocas de poda e produtividade da mandiocaManihot esculenta; cultural practices; rest period; dry matter contentManihot esculenta; práticas culturais; repouso fisiológico; teor de matéria secaThe objective of this work was to assess different pruning dates on the development, production and quality of cassava roots. Two experiments were carried out in two regions of the state of São Paulo, Brazil: Botucatu, on clay soil, and São Manuel, on sandy soil. The experiments were carried out from September 2008 to June 2010, and harvest was done after two growing seasons (22 months). The experimental design was a randomized block design, with four replicates. Ten treatments, nine monthly pruning dates, between April and December, and a control cultivated without pruning were evaluated. Pruning dates were statistically analyzed by orthogonal contrasts, in comparison to the control, and by regression. Cassava pruning during the rest period does not alter dry matter content and root yield. However, when performed at the end of the first cycle or after the start of the second cycle, pruning reduces dry matter content and root yield.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito de diferentes épocas de poda no desenvolvimento, na produção e na qualidade de raízes tuberosas de mandioca. Foram conduzidos dois experimentos, em duas localidades do Estado de São Paulo: Botucatu, em área de solo argiloso, e São Manuel, em solo arenoso. Os experimentos foram conduzidos de setembro de 2008 a junho de 2010, e a colheita foi feita após dois ciclos vegetativos (22 meses). Utilizou-se o delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições. Foram avaliados dez tratamentos, nove épocas de poda espaçadas mensalmente, entre abril e dezembro, e uma testemunha conduzida sem poda. As épocas de poda foram analisadas estatisticamente por contrastes ortogonais, em comparação à testemunha, e por regressão. A poda da mandioca realizada no período de repouso fisiológico não altera o teor de matéria seca e a produtividade de raízes tuberosas. No entanto, quando realizada no final do primeiro ciclo ou após o início do segundo ciclo vegetativo, a poda reduz o teor de matéria seca e a produtividade de raízes.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCAPESAguiar, Eduardo BarretoBicudo, Silvio JoséCurcelli, FelipeFigueiredo, Priscila GonzalesCruz, Simério Carlos Silva2012-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/10747Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.46, n.11, nov. 2011; 1463-1470Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.46, n.11, nov. 2011; 1463-14701678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/10747/6694https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/10747/6158https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/10747/6159info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-05-09T17:29:30Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/10747Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-05-09T17:29:30Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pruning dates and productivity of cassava Épocas de poda e produtividade da mandioca |
title |
Pruning dates and productivity of cassava |
spellingShingle |
Pruning dates and productivity of cassava Aguiar, Eduardo Barreto Manihot esculenta; cultural practices; rest period; dry matter content Manihot esculenta; práticas culturais; repouso fisiológico; teor de matéria seca |
title_short |
Pruning dates and productivity of cassava |
title_full |
Pruning dates and productivity of cassava |
title_fullStr |
Pruning dates and productivity of cassava |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pruning dates and productivity of cassava |
title_sort |
Pruning dates and productivity of cassava |
author |
Aguiar, Eduardo Barreto |
author_facet |
Aguiar, Eduardo Barreto Bicudo, Silvio José Curcelli, Felipe Figueiredo, Priscila Gonzales Cruz, Simério Carlos Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bicudo, Silvio José Curcelli, Felipe Figueiredo, Priscila Gonzales Cruz, Simério Carlos Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
CAPES |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aguiar, Eduardo Barreto Bicudo, Silvio José Curcelli, Felipe Figueiredo, Priscila Gonzales Cruz, Simério Carlos Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Manihot esculenta; cultural practices; rest period; dry matter content Manihot esculenta; práticas culturais; repouso fisiológico; teor de matéria seca |
topic |
Manihot esculenta; cultural practices; rest period; dry matter content Manihot esculenta; práticas culturais; repouso fisiológico; teor de matéria seca |
description |
The objective of this work was to assess different pruning dates on the development, production and quality of cassava roots. Two experiments were carried out in two regions of the state of São Paulo, Brazil: Botucatu, on clay soil, and São Manuel, on sandy soil. The experiments were carried out from September 2008 to June 2010, and harvest was done after two growing seasons (22 months). The experimental design was a randomized block design, with four replicates. Ten treatments, nine monthly pruning dates, between April and December, and a control cultivated without pruning were evaluated. Pruning dates were statistically analyzed by orthogonal contrasts, in comparison to the control, and by regression. Cassava pruning during the rest period does not alter dry matter content and root yield. However, when performed at the end of the first cycle or after the start of the second cycle, pruning reduces dry matter content and root yield. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-02-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/10747 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/10747 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/10747/6694 https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/10747/6158 https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/10747/6159 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.46, n.11, nov. 2011; 1463-1470 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.46, n.11, nov. 2011; 1463-1470 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416681033302016 |