Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheat
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1998 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5081 |
Resumo: | Results from ten experiments carried out in laboratory with microbiolization are compared with the chemical control iprodione + thiran as seed treatment against the following pathogens: Bipolaris sorokiniana (inducer of spot blotch, common root rot, and black point), Pyricularia oryzae (incitant of blast), Drechslera tritici-repentis (inducer of tan spot), and Stagonospora nodorum (incitant of glume blotch). In five experiments, seed microbiolization showed efficiency superior (five to nine per cent) to the fungicide treatment when the percentage of fungi on the seeds was evaluated (lots II, IV, V, VII, and VIII). In three experiments, the efficiency was equal (lots I, IX, and X). In two experiments, chemical seed treatment was more efficient (five to six per cent) than microbiologic treatment (lots III and VI). None of the treatments was specific to any pathogen. These results indicated that the biological method is a promising measure to protect seeds against the main wheat pathogens. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_514f551d4791f3ad1b55154b6854ebf5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5081 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheatMicrobiolização das sementes: uma comparação com o tratamento químico no controle dos principais patógenos das sementes de trigobiological control; Triticum aestivum; seed-borne fungicontrole biológico; Triticum aestivum; fungos de sementesResults from ten experiments carried out in laboratory with microbiolization are compared with the chemical control iprodione + thiran as seed treatment against the following pathogens: Bipolaris sorokiniana (inducer of spot blotch, common root rot, and black point), Pyricularia oryzae (incitant of blast), Drechslera tritici-repentis (inducer of tan spot), and Stagonospora nodorum (incitant of glume blotch). In five experiments, seed microbiolization showed efficiency superior (five to nine per cent) to the fungicide treatment when the percentage of fungi on the seeds was evaluated (lots II, IV, V, VII, and VIII). In three experiments, the efficiency was equal (lots I, IX, and X). In two experiments, chemical seed treatment was more efficient (five to six per cent) than microbiologic treatment (lots III and VI). None of the treatments was specific to any pathogen. These results indicated that the biological method is a promising measure to protect seeds against the main wheat pathogens.Resultados de dez experimentos, realizados em laboratório com a microbiolização, são comparados com o controle químico iprodione + tiram, no tratamento de sementes de trigo, contra os seguintes patógenos: Bipolaris sorokiniana (indutor da mancha marrom, da podridão comum das raízes e da ponta preta dos grãos), Pyricularia oryzae (indutor da brusone), Drechslera tritici-repentis (indutor da mancha bronzeada) e Stagonospora nodorum (indutor da mancha da gluma). Em cinco experimentos, a microbiolização das sementes mostrou uma eficiência superior (cinco a nove por cento), em relação ao tratamento com fungicidas sintéticos, quando foi avaliada a percentagem de fungos nas sementes (lotes II, IV, V, VII e VIII). Em três experimentos, a eficiência foi equivalente (lotes I, IX e X). Em dois experimentos, o tratamento químico foi superior (cinco a seis por cento) ao tratamento microbiológico (lotes III e VI). Não houve especificidade de tratamentos para patógenos. Esses resultados indicaram que o método biológico constitui uma medida de controle promissora contra os principais patógenos da cultura.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirada Luz, Wilmar Cório1998-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5081Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.33, n. especial, maio 1998; 509-513Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.33, n. especial, maio 1998; 509-5131678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5081/7191info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-01-20T16:41:21Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5081Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2015-01-20T16:41:21Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheat Microbiolização das sementes: uma comparação com o tratamento químico no controle dos principais patógenos das sementes de trigo |
title |
Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheat |
spellingShingle |
Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheat da Luz, Wilmar Cório biological control; Triticum aestivum; seed-borne fungi controle biológico; Triticum aestivum; fungos de sementes |
title_short |
Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheat |
title_full |
Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheat |
title_fullStr |
Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheat |
title_sort |
Seed microbiolization: a comparison with chemical treatment to control the main seed-borne pathogens of wheat |
author |
da Luz, Wilmar Cório |
author_facet |
da Luz, Wilmar Cório |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Luz, Wilmar Cório |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biological control; Triticum aestivum; seed-borne fungi controle biológico; Triticum aestivum; fungos de sementes |
topic |
biological control; Triticum aestivum; seed-borne fungi controle biológico; Triticum aestivum; fungos de sementes |
description |
Results from ten experiments carried out in laboratory with microbiolization are compared with the chemical control iprodione + thiran as seed treatment against the following pathogens: Bipolaris sorokiniana (inducer of spot blotch, common root rot, and black point), Pyricularia oryzae (incitant of blast), Drechslera tritici-repentis (inducer of tan spot), and Stagonospora nodorum (incitant of glume blotch). In five experiments, seed microbiolization showed efficiency superior (five to nine per cent) to the fungicide treatment when the percentage of fungi on the seeds was evaluated (lots II, IV, V, VII, and VIII). In three experiments, the efficiency was equal (lots I, IX, and X). In two experiments, chemical seed treatment was more efficient (five to six per cent) than microbiologic treatment (lots III and VI). None of the treatments was specific to any pathogen. These results indicated that the biological method is a promising measure to protect seeds against the main wheat pathogens. |
publishDate |
1998 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1998-12-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5081 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5081 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5081/7191 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.33, n. especial, maio 1998; 509-513 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.33, n. especial, maio 1998; 509-513 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416676075634688 |