A comparison between two different finishing systems for swine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Mércia de Andrade
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Meneguelli, Carlos Alberto, Moreira, Amaury Cavalcanti de Souza, Alvarenga, Júlio Calvelli, Lima, Therezinha de Almeida Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17168
Resumo: An experiment was conducted at the Instituto de Pesquisa Agronecuária do Centro-Sul (IPEACS), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to compare two systems of finishing swine. One group was fattened on pasture, while the other was raised in confinement. Twenty-four weaned Hampshire pigs were used in a randomized block design four replications per treatment. The animals raised in pasture took fewer days to reach a market weight of 90 kg (171 days) than raised in confinement (187 days). Total ration consumed was significantly higher (P < .01) for the group on pasture. Pigs fed on pasture were significantly (P < .05) more efficient at converting feed than those in confinement. Although the pasture fed pigs tended to gain more rapidly, this difference was not statistically significant.
id EMBRAPA-4_5eac416b962bf818abd4e2d91c389bbc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/17168
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison between two different finishing systems for swineComparação de sistemas de criação para suínos tipo carneHampshire; confinement; pasturingHampshire; confinamento; pastejoAn experiment was conducted at the Instituto de Pesquisa Agronecuária do Centro-Sul (IPEACS), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to compare two systems of finishing swine. One group was fattened on pasture, while the other was raised in confinement. Twenty-four weaned Hampshire pigs were used in a randomized block design four replications per treatment. The animals raised in pasture took fewer days to reach a market weight of 90 kg (171 days) than raised in confinement (187 days). Total ration consumed was significantly higher (P < .01) for the group on pasture. Pigs fed on pasture were significantly (P < .05) more efficient at converting feed than those in confinement. Although the pasture fed pigs tended to gain more rapidly, this difference was not statistically significant.Em experimento realizado em Itaguaí, Estado do Rio de Janeiro, com o objetivo de determinar qual o melhor entre dois sistemas de criação para que os porcos atinjam, mais rápida e economicamente, 90 kg, foram utilizados 24 animais desmamados de raça Hampshire, seguindo o delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso com quatro repetições e dois tratamentos. Os animais mantidos em pastejo gastaram menos tempo para atingir 90 kg (171 dias de idade) do que aqueles em confinamento (187 dias de idade). Menor consumo de ração (265 kg), maior ganho médio diário (694 g) e menor conversão alimentar (1:3,77) foram observados no sistema de pastejo.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraRocha, Mércia de AndradeMeneguelli, Carlos AlbertoMoreira, Amaury Cavalcanti de SouzaAlvarenga, Júlio CalvelliLima, Therezinha de Almeida Oliveira2014-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17168Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.9, n.3, 1974: Série Zootecnia; 29-31Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.9, n.3, 1974: Série Zootecnia; 29-311678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17168/11501info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-15T18:54:16Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/17168Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-15T18:54:16Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison between two different finishing systems for swine
Comparação de sistemas de criação para suínos tipo carne
title A comparison between two different finishing systems for swine
spellingShingle A comparison between two different finishing systems for swine
Rocha, Mércia de Andrade
Hampshire; confinement; pasturing
Hampshire; confinamento; pastejo
title_short A comparison between two different finishing systems for swine
title_full A comparison between two different finishing systems for swine
title_fullStr A comparison between two different finishing systems for swine
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between two different finishing systems for swine
title_sort A comparison between two different finishing systems for swine
author Rocha, Mércia de Andrade
author_facet Rocha, Mércia de Andrade
Meneguelli, Carlos Alberto
Moreira, Amaury Cavalcanti de Souza
Alvarenga, Júlio Calvelli
Lima, Therezinha de Almeida Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Meneguelli, Carlos Alberto
Moreira, Amaury Cavalcanti de Souza
Alvarenga, Júlio Calvelli
Lima, Therezinha de Almeida Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Mércia de Andrade
Meneguelli, Carlos Alberto
Moreira, Amaury Cavalcanti de Souza
Alvarenga, Júlio Calvelli
Lima, Therezinha de Almeida Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hampshire; confinement; pasturing
Hampshire; confinamento; pastejo
topic Hampshire; confinement; pasturing
Hampshire; confinamento; pastejo
description An experiment was conducted at the Instituto de Pesquisa Agronecuária do Centro-Sul (IPEACS), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to compare two systems of finishing swine. One group was fattened on pasture, while the other was raised in confinement. Twenty-four weaned Hampshire pigs were used in a randomized block design four replications per treatment. The animals raised in pasture took fewer days to reach a market weight of 90 kg (171 days) than raised in confinement (187 days). Total ration consumed was significantly higher (P < .01) for the group on pasture. Pigs fed on pasture were significantly (P < .05) more efficient at converting feed than those in confinement. Although the pasture fed pigs tended to gain more rapidly, this difference was not statistically significant.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17168
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17168/11501
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.9, n.3, 1974: Série Zootecnia; 29-31
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.9, n.3, 1974: Série Zootecnia; 29-31
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416697467633664

Registros relacionados