Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bedmar, Francisco
Data de Publicação: 1999
Outros Autores: Manetti, Pablo, Monterubbianesi, Gloria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5158
Resumo: Field studies were conducted over 3 years in southeast Buenos Aires, Argentina, to determine the critical period of weed control in maize (Zea mays L.). The treatments consisted of two different periods of weed interference, a critical weed-free period, and a critical time of weed removal. The Gompertz and logistic equations were fitted to relative yields representing the critical weed-free and the critical time of weed removal, respectively. Accumulated thermal units were used to describe each period of weed-free or weed removal. The critical weed-free period and the critical time of weed removal ranged from 222 to 416 and 128 to 261 accumulated thermal units respectively, to prevent yield losses of 2.5%. Weed biomass proved to be inverse to the crop yield for all the years studied. When weeds competed with the crop from emergence, a large increase in weed biomass was achieved 10 days after crop emergence. However, few weed seedlings emerged and prospered after the 5-6 leaf maize stage (10-20 days after emergence).
id EMBRAPA-4_6bab4e09fa7ca6f5d2f3558f7006be83
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5158
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basisDeterminação do período crítico de controle de plantas daninhas em milho utilizando uma base térmicaweed interference; weed management; accumulated thermal units; nonlinear regressioninterferência de plantas daninhas; manejo de plantas daninhas; unidades térmicas acumuladas; regressão não-linearField studies were conducted over 3 years in southeast Buenos Aires, Argentina, to determine the critical period of weed control in maize (Zea mays L.). The treatments consisted of two different periods of weed interference, a critical weed-free period, and a critical time of weed removal. The Gompertz and logistic equations were fitted to relative yields representing the critical weed-free and the critical time of weed removal, respectively. Accumulated thermal units were used to describe each period of weed-free or weed removal. The critical weed-free period and the critical time of weed removal ranged from 222 to 416 and 128 to 261 accumulated thermal units respectively, to prevent yield losses of 2.5%. Weed biomass proved to be inverse to the crop yield for all the years studied. When weeds competed with the crop from emergence, a large increase in weed biomass was achieved 10 days after crop emergence. However, few weed seedlings emerged and prospered after the 5-6 leaf maize stage (10-20 days after emergence).Conduziram-se estudos no campo durante três anos no sudeste da Província de Buenos Aires, Argentina, para determinar o período crítico de controle de plantas daninhas no milho. Os tratamentos consistiram de dois períodos diferentes de interferência das plantas daninhas: um período crítico livre de plantas daninhas, e um período crítico de remoção de plantas daninhas. O período crítico livre de plantas daninhas foi ajustado por meio da equação Gompertz, enquanto o período crítico de remoção de plantas daninhas foi ajustado mediante a equação logística. Foram utilizadas as unidades térmicas para descrever cada período de interferência de plantas daninhas. O período crítico livre e o período crítico de remoção de plantas daninhas variaram de 222 a 416 e de 128 a 261 unidades térmicas acumuladas, respectivamente, para impedir uma perda de rendimento de 2,5%. A biomassa das plantas daninhas variou ao contrário do rendimento do cultivo, em todos os anos estudados. Quando as plantas daninhas competiram com o cultivo desde a emergência, foi alcançado um grande incremento de biomassa aos dez dias após a emergência do cultivo. Porém, poucas plântulas de plantas daninhas emergiram e prosperaram depois do estádio de 5-6 folhas de milho (10-20 dias após a emergência).Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraBedmar, FranciscoManetti, PabloMonterubbianesi, Gloria1999-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5158Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.34, n.2, fev. 1999; 187-193Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.34, n.2, fev. 1999; 187-1931678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5158/2350info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2010-07-13T16:35:00Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5158Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2010-07-13T16:35Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis
Determinação do período crítico de controle de plantas daninhas em milho utilizando uma base térmica
title Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis
spellingShingle Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis
Bedmar, Francisco
weed interference; weed management; accumulated thermal units; nonlinear regression
interferência de plantas daninhas; manejo de plantas daninhas; unidades térmicas acumuladas; regressão não-linear
title_short Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis
title_full Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis
title_fullStr Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis
title_full_unstemmed Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis
title_sort Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis
author Bedmar, Francisco
author_facet Bedmar, Francisco
Manetti, Pablo
Monterubbianesi, Gloria
author_role author
author2 Manetti, Pablo
Monterubbianesi, Gloria
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bedmar, Francisco
Manetti, Pablo
Monterubbianesi, Gloria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv weed interference; weed management; accumulated thermal units; nonlinear regression
interferência de plantas daninhas; manejo de plantas daninhas; unidades térmicas acumuladas; regressão não-linear
topic weed interference; weed management; accumulated thermal units; nonlinear regression
interferência de plantas daninhas; manejo de plantas daninhas; unidades térmicas acumuladas; regressão não-linear
description Field studies were conducted over 3 years in southeast Buenos Aires, Argentina, to determine the critical period of weed control in maize (Zea mays L.). The treatments consisted of two different periods of weed interference, a critical weed-free period, and a critical time of weed removal. The Gompertz and logistic equations were fitted to relative yields representing the critical weed-free and the critical time of weed removal, respectively. Accumulated thermal units were used to describe each period of weed-free or weed removal. The critical weed-free period and the critical time of weed removal ranged from 222 to 416 and 128 to 261 accumulated thermal units respectively, to prevent yield losses of 2.5%. Weed biomass proved to be inverse to the crop yield for all the years studied. When weeds competed with the crop from emergence, a large increase in weed biomass was achieved 10 days after crop emergence. However, few weed seedlings emerged and prospered after the 5-6 leaf maize stage (10-20 days after emergence).
publishDate 1999
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1999-02-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5158
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5158
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5158/2350
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.34, n.2, fev. 1999; 187-193
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.34, n.2, fev. 1999; 187-193
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416706187591680