Soybean nutritional status evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Urano, Eliane Oshiro Mocelin
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Kurihara, Carlos Hissao, Maeda, Shizuo, Vitorino, Antonio Carlos Tadeu, Gonçalves, Manoel Carlos, Marchetti, Marlene Estevão
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7298
Resumo: The objetive of of this work was to compare the diagnostics of the nutritional state of a group of 111 commercial soybean plantations, obtained by Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) and Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis (CND) methods applying the response potencial to fertilization concept. It was observed that zinc, phosphorus and iron were the nutrients diagnosed by both methods as the more restrictive for lack, and magnesium and manganese the more restrictive for excess. Agreement between DRIS and CND diagnoses was higher for nutrients considered of greater relative deficiency (90.3%) than for those considered of greater relative excess (81.9%). When the classes of nutritional state were evaluated, the frequency of plantations with concordant diagnosis varied from 85.9% for phosphorus to 98.6% for manganese. DRIS and CND methods tend to be consonants about nutritional status diagnoses; classes grouping of potential response to fertilization may result in grouping in one class of nutritional state nutrients with high and low probability of response.
id EMBRAPA-4_768d2a7709589e383ad5c3d5db1d490a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/7298
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Soybean nutritional status evaluationAvaliação do estado nutricional da sojaGlycine max; foliar diagnosis; nutritional deficiencyGlycine max; diagnose foliar; deficiência nutricionalThe objetive of of this work was to compare the diagnostics of the nutritional state of a group of 111 commercial soybean plantations, obtained by Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) and Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis (CND) methods applying the response potencial to fertilization concept. It was observed that zinc, phosphorus and iron were the nutrients diagnosed by both methods as the more restrictive for lack, and magnesium and manganese the more restrictive for excess. Agreement between DRIS and CND diagnoses was higher for nutrients considered of greater relative deficiency (90.3%) than for those considered of greater relative excess (81.9%). When the classes of nutritional state were evaluated, the frequency of plantations with concordant diagnosis varied from 85.9% for phosphorus to 98.6% for manganese. DRIS and CND methods tend to be consonants about nutritional status diagnoses; classes grouping of potential response to fertilization may result in grouping in one class of nutritional state nutrients with high and low probability of response.–O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar os diagnósticos do estado nutricional de um conjunto de 111 lavouras comerciais de soja, pelos métodos: Sistema Integrado de Diagnose e Recomendação (DRIS) e Diagnose da Composição Nutricional (CND), com uso do conceito de potencial de resposta à adubação. Nas lavouras analisadas, observou-se que Zn, P e Fe foram os nutrientes diagnosticados por ambos os métodos como os mais limitantes pela ausência, e Mg e Mn os mais limitantes por excesso. A freqüência de lavouras com diagnósticos concordantes, quanto ao potencial de resposta à adubação, foi maior para os nutrientes considerados de maior deficiência relativa (90,3%), em relação aos considerados de maior excesso relativo (81,9%). Quando se avaliaram os diagnósticos concordantes quanto ao estado nutricional, a freqüência variou de 85,9% para o P a 98,6% para o Mn. Os métodos DRIS e CND tendem a ser concordantes quanto ao diagnóstico nutricional; o agrupamento de classes de potencial de resposta à adubação pode resultar no agrupamento, em uma única classe de estado nutricional, os nutrientes com alta e baixa probabilidade de resposta à adubação.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraUrano, Eliane Oshiro MocelinKurihara, Carlos HissaoMaeda, ShizuoVitorino, Antonio Carlos TadeuGonçalves, Manoel CarlosMarchetti, Marlene Estevão2006-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7298Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.41, n.9, set. 2006; 1421-1428Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.41, n.9, set. 2006; 1421-14281678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7298/4343info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-09-30T20:02:28Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/7298Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-09-30T20:02:28Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soybean nutritional status evaluation
Avaliação do estado nutricional da soja
title Soybean nutritional status evaluation
spellingShingle Soybean nutritional status evaluation
Urano, Eliane Oshiro Mocelin
Glycine max; foliar diagnosis; nutritional deficiency
Glycine max; diagnose foliar; deficiência nutricional
title_short Soybean nutritional status evaluation
title_full Soybean nutritional status evaluation
title_fullStr Soybean nutritional status evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Soybean nutritional status evaluation
title_sort Soybean nutritional status evaluation
author Urano, Eliane Oshiro Mocelin
author_facet Urano, Eliane Oshiro Mocelin
Kurihara, Carlos Hissao
Maeda, Shizuo
Vitorino, Antonio Carlos Tadeu
Gonçalves, Manoel Carlos
Marchetti, Marlene Estevão
author_role author
author2 Kurihara, Carlos Hissao
Maeda, Shizuo
Vitorino, Antonio Carlos Tadeu
Gonçalves, Manoel Carlos
Marchetti, Marlene Estevão
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Urano, Eliane Oshiro Mocelin
Kurihara, Carlos Hissao
Maeda, Shizuo
Vitorino, Antonio Carlos Tadeu
Gonçalves, Manoel Carlos
Marchetti, Marlene Estevão
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glycine max; foliar diagnosis; nutritional deficiency
Glycine max; diagnose foliar; deficiência nutricional
topic Glycine max; foliar diagnosis; nutritional deficiency
Glycine max; diagnose foliar; deficiência nutricional
description The objetive of of this work was to compare the diagnostics of the nutritional state of a group of 111 commercial soybean plantations, obtained by Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) and Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis (CND) methods applying the response potencial to fertilization concept. It was observed that zinc, phosphorus and iron were the nutrients diagnosed by both methods as the more restrictive for lack, and magnesium and manganese the more restrictive for excess. Agreement between DRIS and CND diagnoses was higher for nutrients considered of greater relative deficiency (90.3%) than for those considered of greater relative excess (81.9%). When the classes of nutritional state were evaluated, the frequency of plantations with concordant diagnosis varied from 85.9% for phosphorus to 98.6% for manganese. DRIS and CND methods tend to be consonants about nutritional status diagnoses; classes grouping of potential response to fertilization may result in grouping in one class of nutritional state nutrients with high and low probability of response.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-09-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7298
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7298
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/7298/4343
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.41, n.9, set. 2006; 1421-1428
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.41, n.9, set. 2006; 1421-1428
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416696032133120