Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stuepp, Carlos André
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Wendling, Ivar, Koehler, Henrique Soares, Zuffellato-Ribas, Katia Christina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different compositions of renewable substrates and seasons of the year on the quality of Piptocarpha angustifolia clonal plants. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design in a 4x6 factorial arrangement (four seasons x six substrate compositions). The analyzed substrates were: S1, commercial substrate with pine bark and coconut fiber base (CF); S2, carbonized rice husk (CRH); S3, fibrous and grainy CF; S4, 50% CF and 50% CRH; S5, 30% CF and 70% CRH; and S6, 70% CF and 30% CRH. Minicuttings of 8±1 cm were planted in tubes of 110 cm3 and placed in a greenhouse, during the four seasons of the year. The evaluated variables were: survival and number of roots at 70 days; survival and emission of shoots at 100 days; rooting, shoot height, stem diameter, and their ratios; easiness of removal from tubes; aggregation to the substrate; and multiplication rate at 130 days. The highest CRH/CF ratio favored the development of better-quality plants, and S5 was the most adequate substrate. Spring is more favorable to the survival and quality of cuttings, and, together with summer, favors the highest multiplication rates. The S5 substrate has better physical and chemical quality and improves P. angustifolia clonal plants.
id EMBRAPA-4_79ba0ceee3377629025ef77317df58e9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/23705
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the yearQualidade de mudas clonais de Piptocarpha angustifolia em diferentes substratos renováveis e estações do anoagro-industrial residues, clonal forestry, forest plant quality, production of minicuttings, “vassourão-branco”resíduos agroindustriais, silvicultura clonal, qualidade de mudas florestais, miniestaquia, vassourão-brancoThe objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different compositions of renewable substrates and seasons of the year on the quality of Piptocarpha angustifolia clonal plants. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design in a 4x6 factorial arrangement (four seasons x six substrate compositions). The analyzed substrates were: S1, commercial substrate with pine bark and coconut fiber base (CF); S2, carbonized rice husk (CRH); S3, fibrous and grainy CF; S4, 50% CF and 50% CRH; S5, 30% CF and 70% CRH; and S6, 70% CF and 30% CRH. Minicuttings of 8±1 cm were planted in tubes of 110 cm3 and placed in a greenhouse, during the four seasons of the year. The evaluated variables were: survival and number of roots at 70 days; survival and emission of shoots at 100 days; rooting, shoot height, stem diameter, and their ratios; easiness of removal from tubes; aggregation to the substrate; and multiplication rate at 130 days. The highest CRH/CF ratio favored the development of better-quality plants, and S5 was the most adequate substrate. Spring is more favorable to the survival and quality of cuttings, and, together with summer, favors the highest multiplication rates. The S5 substrate has better physical and chemical quality and improves P. angustifolia clonal plants.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito de diferentes composições de substratos renováveis e estações do ano na qualidade de mudas clonais de Piptocarpha angustifolia. O experimento foi conduzido em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, em arranjo fatorial 4x6 (quatro estações do ano x seis composições de substratos). Os substratos avaliados foram: S1, substrato comercial à base de casca de pinus e fibra de coco (FC); S2, casca de arroz carbonizada (CAC); S3, FC fibrosa e granulada; S4, 50% FC e 50% CAC; S5, 30% FC e 70% CAC; e S6, 70% FC e 30% CAC. Miniestacas de 8±1 cm foram plantadas em tubetes de 110 cm3 e acondicionadas em casa de vegetação, nas quatro estações do ano. Avaliaram-se as variáveis: sobrevivência e número de raízes aos 70 dias; sobrevivência e emissão de brotos aos 100 dias; enraizamento, altura da parte aérea, diâmetro do coleto e suas relações; facilidade de retirada dos tubetes; agregação ao substrato; e taxa de multiplicação aos 130 dias. A maior relação CAC/FC favoreceu o crescimento de mudas com melhor qualidade, e S5 foi o substrato mais adequado. A primavera é mais favorável à sobrevivência e à qualidade das mudas e, juntamente com o verão, favorece as maiores taxas de multiplicação. O substrato S5 apresenta melhor qualidade física e química e proporciona melhores mudas clonais de P. angustifolia.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes)Stuepp, Carlos AndréWendling, IvarKoehler, Henrique SoaresZuffellato-Ribas, Katia Christina2016-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.11, nov. 2016; 1821-1829Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.11, nov. 2016; 1821-18291678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705/13625https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/23705/15628Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-12-23T12:32:40Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/23705Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2016-12-23T12:32:40Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year
Qualidade de mudas clonais de Piptocarpha angustifolia em diferentes substratos renováveis e estações do ano
title Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year
spellingShingle Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year
Stuepp, Carlos André
agro-industrial residues, clonal forestry, forest plant quality, production of minicuttings, “vassourão-branco”
resíduos agroindustriais, silvicultura clonal, qualidade de mudas florestais, miniestaquia, vassourão-branco
title_short Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year
title_full Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year
title_fullStr Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year
title_full_unstemmed Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year
title_sort Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year
author Stuepp, Carlos André
author_facet Stuepp, Carlos André
Wendling, Ivar
Koehler, Henrique Soares
Zuffellato-Ribas, Katia Christina
author_role author
author2 Wendling, Ivar
Koehler, Henrique Soares
Zuffellato-Ribas, Katia Christina
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes)

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stuepp, Carlos André
Wendling, Ivar
Koehler, Henrique Soares
Zuffellato-Ribas, Katia Christina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv agro-industrial residues, clonal forestry, forest plant quality, production of minicuttings, “vassourão-branco”
resíduos agroindustriais, silvicultura clonal, qualidade de mudas florestais, miniestaquia, vassourão-branco
topic agro-industrial residues, clonal forestry, forest plant quality, production of minicuttings, “vassourão-branco”
resíduos agroindustriais, silvicultura clonal, qualidade de mudas florestais, miniestaquia, vassourão-branco
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different compositions of renewable substrates and seasons of the year on the quality of Piptocarpha angustifolia clonal plants. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design in a 4x6 factorial arrangement (four seasons x six substrate compositions). The analyzed substrates were: S1, commercial substrate with pine bark and coconut fiber base (CF); S2, carbonized rice husk (CRH); S3, fibrous and grainy CF; S4, 50% CF and 50% CRH; S5, 30% CF and 70% CRH; and S6, 70% CF and 30% CRH. Minicuttings of 8±1 cm were planted in tubes of 110 cm3 and placed in a greenhouse, during the four seasons of the year. The evaluated variables were: survival and number of roots at 70 days; survival and emission of shoots at 100 days; rooting, shoot height, stem diameter, and their ratios; easiness of removal from tubes; aggregation to the substrate; and multiplication rate at 130 days. The highest CRH/CF ratio favored the development of better-quality plants, and S5 was the most adequate substrate. Spring is more favorable to the survival and quality of cuttings, and, together with summer, favors the highest multiplication rates. The S5 substrate has better physical and chemical quality and improves P. angustifolia clonal plants.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705/13625
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/23705/15628
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.11, nov. 2016; 1821-1829
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.11, nov. 2016; 1821-1829
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416695428153344