Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different compositions of renewable substrates and seasons of the year on the quality of Piptocarpha angustifolia clonal plants. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design in a 4x6 factorial arrangement (four seasons x six substrate compositions). The analyzed substrates were: S1, commercial substrate with pine bark and coconut fiber base (CF); S2, carbonized rice husk (CRH); S3, fibrous and grainy CF; S4, 50% CF and 50% CRH; S5, 30% CF and 70% CRH; and S6, 70% CF and 30% CRH. Minicuttings of 8±1 cm were planted in tubes of 110 cm3 and placed in a greenhouse, during the four seasons of the year. The evaluated variables were: survival and number of roots at 70 days; survival and emission of shoots at 100 days; rooting, shoot height, stem diameter, and their ratios; easiness of removal from tubes; aggregation to the substrate; and multiplication rate at 130 days. The highest CRH/CF ratio favored the development of better-quality plants, and S5 was the most adequate substrate. Spring is more favorable to the survival and quality of cuttings, and, together with summer, favors the highest multiplication rates. The S5 substrate has better physical and chemical quality and improves P. angustifolia clonal plants. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_79ba0ceee3377629025ef77317df58e9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/23705 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the yearQualidade de mudas clonais de Piptocarpha angustifolia em diferentes substratos renováveis e estações do anoagro-industrial residues, clonal forestry, forest plant quality, production of minicuttings, “vassourão-branco”resíduos agroindustriais, silvicultura clonal, qualidade de mudas florestais, miniestaquia, vassourão-brancoThe objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different compositions of renewable substrates and seasons of the year on the quality of Piptocarpha angustifolia clonal plants. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design in a 4x6 factorial arrangement (four seasons x six substrate compositions). The analyzed substrates were: S1, commercial substrate with pine bark and coconut fiber base (CF); S2, carbonized rice husk (CRH); S3, fibrous and grainy CF; S4, 50% CF and 50% CRH; S5, 30% CF and 70% CRH; and S6, 70% CF and 30% CRH. Minicuttings of 8±1 cm were planted in tubes of 110 cm3 and placed in a greenhouse, during the four seasons of the year. The evaluated variables were: survival and number of roots at 70 days; survival and emission of shoots at 100 days; rooting, shoot height, stem diameter, and their ratios; easiness of removal from tubes; aggregation to the substrate; and multiplication rate at 130 days. The highest CRH/CF ratio favored the development of better-quality plants, and S5 was the most adequate substrate. Spring is more favorable to the survival and quality of cuttings, and, together with summer, favors the highest multiplication rates. The S5 substrate has better physical and chemical quality and improves P. angustifolia clonal plants.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito de diferentes composições de substratos renováveis e estações do ano na qualidade de mudas clonais de Piptocarpha angustifolia. O experimento foi conduzido em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, em arranjo fatorial 4x6 (quatro estações do ano x seis composições de substratos). Os substratos avaliados foram: S1, substrato comercial à base de casca de pinus e fibra de coco (FC); S2, casca de arroz carbonizada (CAC); S3, FC fibrosa e granulada; S4, 50% FC e 50% CAC; S5, 30% FC e 70% CAC; e S6, 70% FC e 30% CAC. Miniestacas de 8±1 cm foram plantadas em tubetes de 110 cm3 e acondicionadas em casa de vegetação, nas quatro estações do ano. Avaliaram-se as variáveis: sobrevivência e número de raízes aos 70 dias; sobrevivência e emissão de brotos aos 100 dias; enraizamento, altura da parte aérea, diâmetro do coleto e suas relações; facilidade de retirada dos tubetes; agregação ao substrato; e taxa de multiplicação aos 130 dias. A maior relação CAC/FC favoreceu o crescimento de mudas com melhor qualidade, e S5 foi o substrato mais adequado. A primavera é mais favorável à sobrevivência e à qualidade das mudas e, juntamente com o verão, favorece as maiores taxas de multiplicação. O substrato S5 apresenta melhor qualidade física e química e proporciona melhores mudas clonais de P. angustifolia.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes)Stuepp, Carlos AndréWendling, IvarKoehler, Henrique SoaresZuffellato-Ribas, Katia Christina2016-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.11, nov. 2016; 1821-1829Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.11, nov. 2016; 1821-18291678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705/13625https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/23705/15628Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-12-23T12:32:40Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/23705Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2016-12-23T12:32:40Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year Qualidade de mudas clonais de Piptocarpha angustifolia em diferentes substratos renováveis e estações do ano |
title |
Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year |
spellingShingle |
Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year Stuepp, Carlos André agro-industrial residues, clonal forestry, forest plant quality, production of minicuttings, “vassourão-branco” resíduos agroindustriais, silvicultura clonal, qualidade de mudas florestais, miniestaquia, vassourão-branco |
title_short |
Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year |
title_full |
Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year |
title_fullStr |
Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year |
title_sort |
Quality of clonal plants of Piptocarpha angustifolia in different renewable substrates and seasons of the year |
author |
Stuepp, Carlos André |
author_facet |
Stuepp, Carlos André Wendling, Ivar Koehler, Henrique Soares Zuffellato-Ribas, Katia Christina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Wendling, Ivar Koehler, Henrique Soares Zuffellato-Ribas, Katia Christina |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Stuepp, Carlos André Wendling, Ivar Koehler, Henrique Soares Zuffellato-Ribas, Katia Christina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
agro-industrial residues, clonal forestry, forest plant quality, production of minicuttings, “vassourão-branco” resíduos agroindustriais, silvicultura clonal, qualidade de mudas florestais, miniestaquia, vassourão-branco |
topic |
agro-industrial residues, clonal forestry, forest plant quality, production of minicuttings, “vassourão-branco” resíduos agroindustriais, silvicultura clonal, qualidade de mudas florestais, miniestaquia, vassourão-branco |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different compositions of renewable substrates and seasons of the year on the quality of Piptocarpha angustifolia clonal plants. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design in a 4x6 factorial arrangement (four seasons x six substrate compositions). The analyzed substrates were: S1, commercial substrate with pine bark and coconut fiber base (CF); S2, carbonized rice husk (CRH); S3, fibrous and grainy CF; S4, 50% CF and 50% CRH; S5, 30% CF and 70% CRH; and S6, 70% CF and 30% CRH. Minicuttings of 8±1 cm were planted in tubes of 110 cm3 and placed in a greenhouse, during the four seasons of the year. The evaluated variables were: survival and number of roots at 70 days; survival and emission of shoots at 100 days; rooting, shoot height, stem diameter, and their ratios; easiness of removal from tubes; aggregation to the substrate; and multiplication rate at 130 days. The highest CRH/CF ratio favored the development of better-quality plants, and S5 was the most adequate substrate. Spring is more favorable to the survival and quality of cuttings, and, together with summer, favors the highest multiplication rates. The S5 substrate has better physical and chemical quality and improves P. angustifolia clonal plants. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-23 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/23705/13625 https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/23705/15628 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.11, nov. 2016; 1821-1829 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.11, nov. 2016; 1821-1829 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416695428153344 |