Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1995 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347 |
Resumo: | The study of root system requires quantitative methods that combine speed and precision. The intersection method, that estimates the length through counting intersections between root segments and a gridline, and the photoelectric method, that measures the area with an electronic area meter, were compared on estimating root length, root surface area, and mean root radius. The methods were gauged against plastic wires with diameters of 0.7, 1.19 and 3.55 mm, showing similar precision and accuracy. For maize (Zea mays L.) plants grown in soil and in nutrient solution, the intersection method underestimated the values of area and length on fine roots (diameter < 2 mm). The discrepancy between methods was higher in nutrient solution grown plants. The same operator spent an average of 4.0 and 15.6 min. per 10 m of roots, on the execution of the photoelectric and the intersection methods, respectively. Using sub-samples with 20% of total roots volume, the photoelectric method produced satisfactory results, but the intersection method generated high values of coefficient of variation. The uses of the photoelectric method on quantification of root parameters and influx of nutrients area discussed. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_962eecfc888fecc70136ad24300947cb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/4347 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radiusComparação dos métodos fotoelétrico e da interseção na determinação de área, comprimento e raio médio radicularmaize; nitrogen; root; Zea maysmilho; nitrogênio; raiz; Zea maysThe study of root system requires quantitative methods that combine speed and precision. The intersection method, that estimates the length through counting intersections between root segments and a gridline, and the photoelectric method, that measures the area with an electronic area meter, were compared on estimating root length, root surface area, and mean root radius. The methods were gauged against plastic wires with diameters of 0.7, 1.19 and 3.55 mm, showing similar precision and accuracy. For maize (Zea mays L.) plants grown in soil and in nutrient solution, the intersection method underestimated the values of area and length on fine roots (diameter < 2 mm). The discrepancy between methods was higher in nutrient solution grown plants. The same operator spent an average of 4.0 and 15.6 min. per 10 m of roots, on the execution of the photoelectric and the intersection methods, respectively. Using sub-samples with 20% of total roots volume, the photoelectric method produced satisfactory results, but the intersection method generated high values of coefficient of variation. The uses of the photoelectric method on quantification of root parameters and influx of nutrients area discussed.O estudo do sistema radicular exige métodos quantitativos que combinem rapidez e precisão. O método da interseção, que estima o comprimento através de contagens das interseções entre segmentos de raízes e uma quadrícula, e o método fotoelétrico, que quantifica a área com um medidor eletrônico, foram comparados na determinação do comprimento, área superficial e raio médio radicular. Os métodos foram calibrados com fios de plástico com diâmetros de 0,7, 1,19 e 3,55 mm, apresentando precisão e acurácia equivalentes. Em plantas de milho (Zea mays L.), cultivadas em solo e em solução nutritiva, o método da interseção subestimou os valores de área e comprimento nas raízes finas (diâmetro < 2 mm). A discrepância entre os métodos foi maior nas plantas cultivadas em solução nutritiva. O mesmo operador gastou, em média, 4,0 e 15,6 min por 10 m de raízes, na execução dos métodos fotoelétrico e da interseção, respectivamente. Utilizando subamostras com 20% do volume radicular total, o método fotoelétrico produziu resultados satisfatórios, mas o método da interseção gerou elevados coeficientes de variação. Discutem-se os usos do método fotoelétrico na quantificação de parâmetros do sistema radicular e do influxo de nutrientes.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraRossiello, Roberto Oscar PereyraAraújo, Adelson PauloManzatto, Celso VainerFernandes, Manlio Silvestre1995-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.30, n.5, maio 1995; 633-638Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.30, n.5, maio 1995; 633-6381678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347/1633info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2010-06-01T19:55:36Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/4347Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2010-06-01T19:55:36Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius Comparação dos métodos fotoelétrico e da interseção na determinação de área, comprimento e raio médio radicular |
title |
Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra maize; nitrogen; root; Zea mays milho; nitrogênio; raiz; Zea mays |
title_short |
Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius |
title_full |
Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius |
title_sort |
Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius |
author |
Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra |
author_facet |
Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra Araújo, Adelson Paulo Manzatto, Celso Vainer Fernandes, Manlio Silvestre |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Araújo, Adelson Paulo Manzatto, Celso Vainer Fernandes, Manlio Silvestre |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra Araújo, Adelson Paulo Manzatto, Celso Vainer Fernandes, Manlio Silvestre |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
maize; nitrogen; root; Zea mays milho; nitrogênio; raiz; Zea mays |
topic |
maize; nitrogen; root; Zea mays milho; nitrogênio; raiz; Zea mays |
description |
The study of root system requires quantitative methods that combine speed and precision. The intersection method, that estimates the length through counting intersections between root segments and a gridline, and the photoelectric method, that measures the area with an electronic area meter, were compared on estimating root length, root surface area, and mean root radius. The methods were gauged against plastic wires with diameters of 0.7, 1.19 and 3.55 mm, showing similar precision and accuracy. For maize (Zea mays L.) plants grown in soil and in nutrient solution, the intersection method underestimated the values of area and length on fine roots (diameter < 2 mm). The discrepancy between methods was higher in nutrient solution grown plants. The same operator spent an average of 4.0 and 15.6 min. per 10 m of roots, on the execution of the photoelectric and the intersection methods, respectively. Using sub-samples with 20% of total roots volume, the photoelectric method produced satisfactory results, but the intersection method generated high values of coefficient of variation. The uses of the photoelectric method on quantification of root parameters and influx of nutrients area discussed. |
publishDate |
1995 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1995-05-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347/1633 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.30, n.5, maio 1995; 633-638 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.30, n.5, maio 1995; 633-638 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416683375820800 |