Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra
Data de Publicação: 1995
Outros Autores: Araújo, Adelson Paulo, Manzatto, Celso Vainer, Fernandes, Manlio Silvestre
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347
Resumo: The study of root system requires quantitative methods that combine speed and precision. The intersection method, that estimates the length through counting intersections between root segments and a gridline, and the photoelectric method, that measures the area with an electronic area meter, were compared on estimating root length, root surface area, and mean root radius. The methods were gauged against plastic wires with diameters of 0.7, 1.19 and 3.55 mm, showing similar precision and accuracy. For maize (Zea mays L.) plants grown in soil and in nutrient solution, the intersection method underestimated the values of area and length on fine roots (diameter < 2 mm). The discrepancy between methods was higher in nutrient solution grown plants. The same operator spent an average of 4.0 and 15.6 min. per 10 m of roots, on the execution of the photoelectric and the intersection methods, respectively. Using sub-samples with 20% of total roots volume, the photoelectric method produced satisfactory results, but the intersection method generated high values of coefficient of variation. The uses of the photoelectric method on quantification of root parameters and influx of nutrients area discussed.
id EMBRAPA-4_962eecfc888fecc70136ad24300947cb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/4347
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radiusComparação dos métodos fotoelétrico e da interseção na determinação de área, comprimento e raio médio radicularmaize; nitrogen; root; Zea maysmilho; nitrogênio; raiz; Zea maysThe study of root system requires quantitative methods that combine speed and precision. The intersection method, that estimates the length through counting intersections between root segments and a gridline, and the photoelectric method, that measures the area with an electronic area meter, were compared on estimating root length, root surface area, and mean root radius. The methods were gauged against plastic wires with diameters of 0.7, 1.19 and 3.55 mm, showing similar precision and accuracy. For maize (Zea mays L.) plants grown in soil and in nutrient solution, the intersection method underestimated the values of area and length on fine roots (diameter < 2 mm). The discrepancy between methods was higher in nutrient solution grown plants. The same operator spent an average of 4.0 and 15.6 min. per 10 m of roots, on the execution of the photoelectric and the intersection methods, respectively. Using sub-samples with 20% of total roots volume, the photoelectric method produced satisfactory results, but the intersection method generated high values of coefficient of variation. The uses of the photoelectric method on quantification of root parameters and influx of nutrients area discussed.O estudo do sistema radicular exige métodos quantitativos que combinem rapidez e precisão. O método da interseção, que estima o comprimento através de contagens das interseções entre segmentos de raízes e uma quadrícula, e o método fotoelétrico, que quantifica a área com um medidor eletrônico, foram comparados na determinação do comprimento, área superficial e raio médio radicular. Os métodos foram calibrados com fios de plástico com diâmetros de 0,7, 1,19 e 3,55 mm, apresentando precisão e acurácia equivalentes. Em plantas de milho (Zea mays L.), cultivadas em solo e em solução nutritiva, o método da interseção subestimou os valores de área e comprimento nas raízes finas (diâmetro < 2 mm). A discrepância entre os métodos foi maior nas plantas cultivadas em solução nutritiva. O mesmo operador gastou, em média, 4,0 e 15,6 min por 10 m de raízes, na execução dos métodos fotoelétrico e da interseção, respectivamente. Utilizando subamostras com 20% do volume radicular total, o método fotoelétrico produziu resultados satisfatórios, mas o método da interseção gerou elevados coeficientes de variação. Discutem-se os usos do método fotoelétrico na quantificação de parâmetros do sistema radicular e do influxo de nutrientes.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraRossiello, Roberto Oscar PereyraAraújo, Adelson PauloManzatto, Celso VainerFernandes, Manlio Silvestre1995-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.30, n.5, maio 1995; 633-638Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.30, n.5, maio 1995; 633-6381678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347/1633info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2010-06-01T19:55:36Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/4347Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2010-06-01T19:55:36Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius
Comparação dos métodos fotoelétrico e da interseção na determinação de área, comprimento e raio médio radicular
title Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius
spellingShingle Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius
Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra
maize; nitrogen; root; Zea mays
milho; nitrogênio; raiz; Zea mays
title_short Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius
title_full Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius
title_fullStr Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius
title_sort Comparison of the photoelectric and the intersection methods of estimating root area, root lengh and mean root radius
author Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra
author_facet Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra
Araújo, Adelson Paulo
Manzatto, Celso Vainer
Fernandes, Manlio Silvestre
author_role author
author2 Araújo, Adelson Paulo
Manzatto, Celso Vainer
Fernandes, Manlio Silvestre
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rossiello, Roberto Oscar Pereyra
Araújo, Adelson Paulo
Manzatto, Celso Vainer
Fernandes, Manlio Silvestre
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv maize; nitrogen; root; Zea mays
milho; nitrogênio; raiz; Zea mays
topic maize; nitrogen; root; Zea mays
milho; nitrogênio; raiz; Zea mays
description The study of root system requires quantitative methods that combine speed and precision. The intersection method, that estimates the length through counting intersections between root segments and a gridline, and the photoelectric method, that measures the area with an electronic area meter, were compared on estimating root length, root surface area, and mean root radius. The methods were gauged against plastic wires with diameters of 0.7, 1.19 and 3.55 mm, showing similar precision and accuracy. For maize (Zea mays L.) plants grown in soil and in nutrient solution, the intersection method underestimated the values of area and length on fine roots (diameter < 2 mm). The discrepancy between methods was higher in nutrient solution grown plants. The same operator spent an average of 4.0 and 15.6 min. per 10 m of roots, on the execution of the photoelectric and the intersection methods, respectively. Using sub-samples with 20% of total roots volume, the photoelectric method produced satisfactory results, but the intersection method generated high values of coefficient of variation. The uses of the photoelectric method on quantification of root parameters and influx of nutrients area discussed.
publishDate 1995
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1995-05-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4347/1633
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.30, n.5, maio 1995; 633-638
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.30, n.5, maio 1995; 633-638
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416683375820800