Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1999 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5168 |
Resumo: | The objective of this paper was the comparative study of the most important extractors of soil phosphorus. It presents a literature review of papers that deal with methods of extraction for the evaluation of phosphorus availability in soils. The methods considered were: anion exchange resin, Olsen, Bray 1, Bray 2, Mehlich 1, Troug, Égner, water, 0,01M CaCl2, iron hydroxide impregnated filter paper (Pi) and the determinations of the E and L values. The comparison between results of soil analysis by different methods of phosphorus extraction in soils and phosphorus uptake by plants was initially made considering the coefficient of determination (r2) for several extractants. The following average values and corresponding numbers of articles in which the method was considered were obtained: resin, 70% (34); E value, 68% (16); L value, 65% (8); Olsen, 54% (48); Bray 1, 50% (42); Mehlich 1, 46% (25); Égner, 44% (9); Bray 2, 42% (19); Water, 42% (15); Truog, 38% (13); CaCl2, 36% (13), and Morgan, 32% (13). The comparison of several methods, considering the pairs of results (r2) obtained for the extractants, that were tested together through linear correlation and average contrasts (t student test), indicated that the resin method was statistically superior to the other methods. The resin method presents the following favorable features: (a) highest values for the determinations coefficients for the correlations between P uptake by plants and soil P by the different methods, as reviewed in 72 papers; (b) it can be used in both acid and alkaline soils, which is not the case for the other most commonly used methods; (c) it reveals adequately the effect of liming on the increase of P availability in soils for crops, which is not the case of Mehlich 1, Bray 1 and Olsen; (d) it does not overestimate P availability in soils treated with rock phosphates, as is the case of acid extractans; (e) it is the method with the best theoretical background. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_c22ecf630bbd113e3765138107d36d17 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5168 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting proceduresDisponibilidade de fósforo em solos avaliada por diferentes extratoressoil phosphorus; phosphorus extractantsfósforo no solo; extratores de fósforoThe objective of this paper was the comparative study of the most important extractors of soil phosphorus. It presents a literature review of papers that deal with methods of extraction for the evaluation of phosphorus availability in soils. The methods considered were: anion exchange resin, Olsen, Bray 1, Bray 2, Mehlich 1, Troug, Égner, water, 0,01M CaCl2, iron hydroxide impregnated filter paper (Pi) and the determinations of the E and L values. The comparison between results of soil analysis by different methods of phosphorus extraction in soils and phosphorus uptake by plants was initially made considering the coefficient of determination (r2) for several extractants. The following average values and corresponding numbers of articles in which the method was considered were obtained: resin, 70% (34); E value, 68% (16); L value, 65% (8); Olsen, 54% (48); Bray 1, 50% (42); Mehlich 1, 46% (25); Égner, 44% (9); Bray 2, 42% (19); Water, 42% (15); Truog, 38% (13); CaCl2, 36% (13), and Morgan, 32% (13). The comparison of several methods, considering the pairs of results (r2) obtained for the extractants, that were tested together through linear correlation and average contrasts (t student test), indicated that the resin method was statistically superior to the other methods. The resin method presents the following favorable features: (a) highest values for the determinations coefficients for the correlations between P uptake by plants and soil P by the different methods, as reviewed in 72 papers; (b) it can be used in both acid and alkaline soils, which is not the case for the other most commonly used methods; (c) it reveals adequately the effect of liming on the increase of P availability in soils for crops, which is not the case of Mehlich 1, Bray 1 and Olsen; (d) it does not overestimate P availability in soils treated with rock phosphates, as is the case of acid extractans; (e) it is the method with the best theoretical background.O objetivo deste trabalho foi o estudo comparativo dos extratores mais importantes do fósforo do solo. É apresentada uma revisão da literatura sobre métodos de avaliação da disponibilidade de fósforo em solos. Os métodos considerados foram: resina trocadora de ânions, Olsen, Bray 1, Bray 2, Mehlich 1, Truog, Morgan, Égner, Água, CaCl2 0,01M, papel de filtro com hidróxido férrico, e as técnicas de troca isotópica, expressos como valor E e valor L. Nos trabalhos considerados, as comparações de métodos foram feitas com base em correlações entre o P absorvido pelas plantas e o P extraído do solo pelas diferentes técnicas. Inicialmente, foi feita uma comparação conjunta dos resultados de todos os trabalhos, considerando os coeficientes de determinação (r2). Os valores médios obtidos e o número de artigos em que o método foi testado, indicados entre parênteses, foram os seguintes: resina trocadora de ânions, 70% (34); valor E, 68% (16); valor L, 65% (8); Olsen, 54% (48); Bray 1, 50% (42); Mehlich 1, 46% (25); Égner, 44% (9); Bray 2, 42% (19); Água, 42% (15); Truog, 38% (13); CaCl2, 36% (13), e Morgan, 32% (13). O confronto dos diversos métodos em duplas, considerando-se os pares de resultados (r2) obtidos pelos extratores que foram testados conjuntamente, através de correlações lineares e contraste de médias (teste t), levou à conclusão de que o método da resina foi estatisticamente superior aos demais. O método da resina tem os seguintes aspectos favoráveis: (a) apresenta valores de coeficientes de determinação, para a correlação entre P absorvido por plantas e P no solo, consistentemente superiores aos dos demais métodos na maior parte dos 72 trabalhos revisados; (b) pode ser usado tanto em solos ácidos como alcalinos, o que não é o caso para outros extratores importantes; (c) revela, adequadamente, o efeito da calagem em aumentar a disponibilidade de P para as plantas, o que não acontece com os métodos Mehlich 1, Bray 1 e Olsen; (d) não superestima, como os extratores ácidos, a disponibilidade de P em solos tratados com fosfatos naturais; (e) é o que apresenta o melhor embasamento teórico para a determinação do chamado "fator quantidade" de P em solos, que é o mais importante índice da disponibilidade do nutriente.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraSilva, Fábio Cesar daRaij, Bernardo Van1999-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5168Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.34, n.2, fev. 1999; 267-288Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.34, n.2, fev. 1999; 267-2881678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5168/2360info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2010-07-13T18:01:34Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5168Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2010-07-13T18:01:34Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures Disponibilidade de fósforo em solos avaliada por diferentes extratores |
title |
Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures |
spellingShingle |
Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures Silva, Fábio Cesar da soil phosphorus; phosphorus extractants fósforo no solo; extratores de fósforo |
title_short |
Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures |
title_full |
Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures |
title_fullStr |
Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures |
title_sort |
Phosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures |
author |
Silva, Fábio Cesar da |
author_facet |
Silva, Fábio Cesar da Raij, Bernardo Van |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Raij, Bernardo Van |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Fábio Cesar da Raij, Bernardo Van |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
soil phosphorus; phosphorus extractants fósforo no solo; extratores de fósforo |
topic |
soil phosphorus; phosphorus extractants fósforo no solo; extratores de fósforo |
description |
The objective of this paper was the comparative study of the most important extractors of soil phosphorus. It presents a literature review of papers that deal with methods of extraction for the evaluation of phosphorus availability in soils. The methods considered were: anion exchange resin, Olsen, Bray 1, Bray 2, Mehlich 1, Troug, Égner, water, 0,01M CaCl2, iron hydroxide impregnated filter paper (Pi) and the determinations of the E and L values. The comparison between results of soil analysis by different methods of phosphorus extraction in soils and phosphorus uptake by plants was initially made considering the coefficient of determination (r2) for several extractants. The following average values and corresponding numbers of articles in which the method was considered were obtained: resin, 70% (34); E value, 68% (16); L value, 65% (8); Olsen, 54% (48); Bray 1, 50% (42); Mehlich 1, 46% (25); Égner, 44% (9); Bray 2, 42% (19); Water, 42% (15); Truog, 38% (13); CaCl2, 36% (13), and Morgan, 32% (13). The comparison of several methods, considering the pairs of results (r2) obtained for the extractants, that were tested together through linear correlation and average contrasts (t student test), indicated that the resin method was statistically superior to the other methods. The resin method presents the following favorable features: (a) highest values for the determinations coefficients for the correlations between P uptake by plants and soil P by the different methods, as reviewed in 72 papers; (b) it can be used in both acid and alkaline soils, which is not the case for the other most commonly used methods; (c) it reveals adequately the effect of liming on the increase of P availability in soils for crops, which is not the case of Mehlich 1, Bray 1 and Olsen; (d) it does not overestimate P availability in soils treated with rock phosphates, as is the case of acid extractans; (e) it is the method with the best theoretical background. |
publishDate |
1999 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1999-02-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5168 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5168 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5168/2360 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.34, n.2, fev. 1999; 267-288 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.34, n.2, fev. 1999; 267-288 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416650175807488 |