Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Damin, Virginia, Dias, Ana Carolina Ribeiro, Yamasaki, Gaspar Miura, Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999
Resumo: This work was developed with the objective of evaluating the efficacy and the pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer. In field conditions, two rates of glyphosate (360 and 720 g ha-1) were applied either alone or combined with two concentrations of urea (2.5 and 5.0 g L-1) or ammonium sulfate (7.5 and 15.0 g L-1). In laboratory, the pH of the glyphosate solutions was measured after using different concentrations of the product and nitrogen fertilizers and after using a CO2-pressurized sprayer. For all field condition evaluations, the lowest glyphosate rate had higher biological efficacy after the addition of ammonium sulfate (15 g L-1) to the spray solution. Urea (5 g L-1) promoted benefits only at the 28th-day evaluation. In laboratory, the increase of glyphosate concentration promoted gradual acidification of the spray solution, which stabilized at pH 4.5. Ammonium sulfate caused minor acidification of the herbicide solution, whereas urea did not change the pH. The use of CO2-pressurized sprayer had small effect on the solution's pH. Highest glyphosate efficacy identified after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers has little relation with changes on the solution's pH.
id EMBRAPA-4_cb5b71e6403a29bab5eefa35bd51abe4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/1999
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayerEficácia e pH de caldas de glifosato após a adição de fertilizantes nitrogenados e utilização de pulverizador pressurizado por CO2absorption; acidifi cation; herbicide spray; desiccation; ammonium sulfate; ureaabsorção; acidificação; calda herbicida; dessecação; sulfato de amônio; uréiaThis work was developed with the objective of evaluating the efficacy and the pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer. In field conditions, two rates of glyphosate (360 and 720 g ha-1) were applied either alone or combined with two concentrations of urea (2.5 and 5.0 g L-1) or ammonium sulfate (7.5 and 15.0 g L-1). In laboratory, the pH of the glyphosate solutions was measured after using different concentrations of the product and nitrogen fertilizers and after using a CO2-pressurized sprayer. For all field condition evaluations, the lowest glyphosate rate had higher biological efficacy after the addition of ammonium sulfate (15 g L-1) to the spray solution. Urea (5 g L-1) promoted benefits only at the 28th-day evaluation. In laboratory, the increase of glyphosate concentration promoted gradual acidification of the spray solution, which stabilized at pH 4.5. Ammonium sulfate caused minor acidification of the herbicide solution, whereas urea did not change the pH. The use of CO2-pressurized sprayer had small effect on the solution's pH. Highest glyphosate efficacy identified after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers has little relation with changes on the solution's pH.Este trabalho foi desenvolvido com o objetivo de avaliar a eficácia e o pH de caldas de glifosato após a adição de fertilizantes nitrogenados e utilização de pulverizador pressurizado por CO2. Em campo, foram aplicadas duas doses de glifosato (360 e 720 g ha-1), isoladas ou combinadas a duas concentrações de ureia (2,5 e 5,0 g L-1) ou sulfato de amônio (7,5 e 15,0 g L-1). Em laboratório, mensurou-se o pH de caldas de glifosato após o uso de diferentes concentrações do produto e dos fertilizantes nitrogenados e após a utilização do pulverizador pressurizado por CO2. Em todas as avaliações do experimento em campo, a menor dose de glifosato teve maior eficácia biológica após a adição de sulfato de amônio (15 g L-1) à calda. A ureia (5 g L-1) proporcionou efeitos benéficos somente na avaliação aos 28 dias após a aplicação. Em laboratório, o aumento da concentração de glifosato promoveu gradativa acidificação da calda de pulverização, com estabilização do pH da solução em 4,5. O sulfato de amônio causou pequena acidificação da calda herbicida, enquanto a ureia não alterou o pH. O uso do pulverizador pressurizado por CO2 pouco alterou o pH da calda de glifosato. A maior eficácia do glifosato após a adição de fertilizantes nitrogenados à calda está pouco relacionada com alterações no pH da solução.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCNPqCarvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto deDamin, VirginiaDias, Ana Carolina RibeiroYamasaki, Gaspar MiuraChristoffoleti, Pedro Jacob2010-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.44, n.6, jun. 2009; 569-575Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.44, n.6, jun. 2009; 569-5751678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999/5741https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/1999/1386info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-06-17T11:50:16Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/1999Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2012-06-17T11:50:16Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer
Eficácia e pH de caldas de glifosato após a adição de fertilizantes nitrogenados e utilização de pulverizador pressurizado por CO2
title Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer
spellingShingle Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer
Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
absorption; acidifi cation; herbicide spray; desiccation; ammonium sulfate; urea
absorção; acidificação; calda herbicida; dessecação; sulfato de amônio; uréia
title_short Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer
title_full Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer
title_fullStr Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer
title_sort Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer
author Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
author_facet Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
Damin, Virginia
Dias, Ana Carolina Ribeiro
Yamasaki, Gaspar Miura
Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
author_role author
author2 Damin, Virginia
Dias, Ana Carolina Ribeiro
Yamasaki, Gaspar Miura
Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
CNPq
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
Damin, Virginia
Dias, Ana Carolina Ribeiro
Yamasaki, Gaspar Miura
Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv absorption; acidifi cation; herbicide spray; desiccation; ammonium sulfate; urea
absorção; acidificação; calda herbicida; dessecação; sulfato de amônio; uréia
topic absorption; acidifi cation; herbicide spray; desiccation; ammonium sulfate; urea
absorção; acidificação; calda herbicida; dessecação; sulfato de amônio; uréia
description This work was developed with the objective of evaluating the efficacy and the pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer. In field conditions, two rates of glyphosate (360 and 720 g ha-1) were applied either alone or combined with two concentrations of urea (2.5 and 5.0 g L-1) or ammonium sulfate (7.5 and 15.0 g L-1). In laboratory, the pH of the glyphosate solutions was measured after using different concentrations of the product and nitrogen fertilizers and after using a CO2-pressurized sprayer. For all field condition evaluations, the lowest glyphosate rate had higher biological efficacy after the addition of ammonium sulfate (15 g L-1) to the spray solution. Urea (5 g L-1) promoted benefits only at the 28th-day evaluation. In laboratory, the increase of glyphosate concentration promoted gradual acidification of the spray solution, which stabilized at pH 4.5. Ammonium sulfate caused minor acidification of the herbicide solution, whereas urea did not change the pH. The use of CO2-pressurized sprayer had small effect on the solution's pH. Highest glyphosate efficacy identified after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers has little relation with changes on the solution's pH.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-11-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999/5741
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/1999/1386
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.44, n.6, jun. 2009; 569-575
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.44, n.6, jun. 2009; 569-575
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416681017573376