Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999 |
Resumo: | This work was developed with the objective of evaluating the efficacy and the pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer. In field conditions, two rates of glyphosate (360 and 720 g ha-1) were applied either alone or combined with two concentrations of urea (2.5 and 5.0 g L-1) or ammonium sulfate (7.5 and 15.0 g L-1). In laboratory, the pH of the glyphosate solutions was measured after using different concentrations of the product and nitrogen fertilizers and after using a CO2-pressurized sprayer. For all field condition evaluations, the lowest glyphosate rate had higher biological efficacy after the addition of ammonium sulfate (15 g L-1) to the spray solution. Urea (5 g L-1) promoted benefits only at the 28th-day evaluation. In laboratory, the increase of glyphosate concentration promoted gradual acidification of the spray solution, which stabilized at pH 4.5. Ammonium sulfate caused minor acidification of the herbicide solution, whereas urea did not change the pH. The use of CO2-pressurized sprayer had small effect on the solution's pH. Highest glyphosate efficacy identified after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers has little relation with changes on the solution's pH. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_cb5b71e6403a29bab5eefa35bd51abe4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/1999 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayerEficácia e pH de caldas de glifosato após a adição de fertilizantes nitrogenados e utilização de pulverizador pressurizado por CO2absorption; acidifi cation; herbicide spray; desiccation; ammonium sulfate; ureaabsorção; acidificação; calda herbicida; dessecação; sulfato de amônio; uréiaThis work was developed with the objective of evaluating the efficacy and the pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer. In field conditions, two rates of glyphosate (360 and 720 g ha-1) were applied either alone or combined with two concentrations of urea (2.5 and 5.0 g L-1) or ammonium sulfate (7.5 and 15.0 g L-1). In laboratory, the pH of the glyphosate solutions was measured after using different concentrations of the product and nitrogen fertilizers and after using a CO2-pressurized sprayer. For all field condition evaluations, the lowest glyphosate rate had higher biological efficacy after the addition of ammonium sulfate (15 g L-1) to the spray solution. Urea (5 g L-1) promoted benefits only at the 28th-day evaluation. In laboratory, the increase of glyphosate concentration promoted gradual acidification of the spray solution, which stabilized at pH 4.5. Ammonium sulfate caused minor acidification of the herbicide solution, whereas urea did not change the pH. The use of CO2-pressurized sprayer had small effect on the solution's pH. Highest glyphosate efficacy identified after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers has little relation with changes on the solution's pH.Este trabalho foi desenvolvido com o objetivo de avaliar a eficácia e o pH de caldas de glifosato após a adição de fertilizantes nitrogenados e utilização de pulverizador pressurizado por CO2. Em campo, foram aplicadas duas doses de glifosato (360 e 720 g ha-1), isoladas ou combinadas a duas concentrações de ureia (2,5 e 5,0 g L-1) ou sulfato de amônio (7,5 e 15,0 g L-1). Em laboratório, mensurou-se o pH de caldas de glifosato após o uso de diferentes concentrações do produto e dos fertilizantes nitrogenados e após a utilização do pulverizador pressurizado por CO2. Em todas as avaliações do experimento em campo, a menor dose de glifosato teve maior eficácia biológica após a adição de sulfato de amônio (15 g L-1) à calda. A ureia (5 g L-1) proporcionou efeitos benéficos somente na avaliação aos 28 dias após a aplicação. Em laboratório, o aumento da concentração de glifosato promoveu gradativa acidificação da calda de pulverização, com estabilização do pH da solução em 4,5. O sulfato de amônio causou pequena acidificação da calda herbicida, enquanto a ureia não alterou o pH. O uso do pulverizador pressurizado por CO2 pouco alterou o pH da calda de glifosato. A maior eficácia do glifosato após a adição de fertilizantes nitrogenados à calda está pouco relacionada com alterações no pH da solução.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCNPqCarvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto deDamin, VirginiaDias, Ana Carolina RibeiroYamasaki, Gaspar MiuraChristoffoleti, Pedro Jacob2010-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.44, n.6, jun. 2009; 569-575Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.44, n.6, jun. 2009; 569-5751678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999/5741https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/1999/1386info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-06-17T11:50:16Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/1999Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2012-06-17T11:50:16Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer Eficácia e pH de caldas de glifosato após a adição de fertilizantes nitrogenados e utilização de pulverizador pressurizado por CO2 |
title |
Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de absorption; acidifi cation; herbicide spray; desiccation; ammonium sulfate; urea absorção; acidificação; calda herbicida; dessecação; sulfato de amônio; uréia |
title_short |
Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer |
title_full |
Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer |
title_sort |
Efficacy and pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer |
author |
Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de Damin, Virginia Dias, Ana Carolina Ribeiro Yamasaki, Gaspar Miura Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Damin, Virginia Dias, Ana Carolina Ribeiro Yamasaki, Gaspar Miura Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
CNPq |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de Damin, Virginia Dias, Ana Carolina Ribeiro Yamasaki, Gaspar Miura Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
absorption; acidifi cation; herbicide spray; desiccation; ammonium sulfate; urea absorção; acidificação; calda herbicida; dessecação; sulfato de amônio; uréia |
topic |
absorption; acidifi cation; herbicide spray; desiccation; ammonium sulfate; urea absorção; acidificação; calda herbicida; dessecação; sulfato de amônio; uréia |
description |
This work was developed with the objective of evaluating the efficacy and the pH of glyphosate spray solutions after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers and the use of CO2-pressurized sprayer. In field conditions, two rates of glyphosate (360 and 720 g ha-1) were applied either alone or combined with two concentrations of urea (2.5 and 5.0 g L-1) or ammonium sulfate (7.5 and 15.0 g L-1). In laboratory, the pH of the glyphosate solutions was measured after using different concentrations of the product and nitrogen fertilizers and after using a CO2-pressurized sprayer. For all field condition evaluations, the lowest glyphosate rate had higher biological efficacy after the addition of ammonium sulfate (15 g L-1) to the spray solution. Urea (5 g L-1) promoted benefits only at the 28th-day evaluation. In laboratory, the increase of glyphosate concentration promoted gradual acidification of the spray solution, which stabilized at pH 4.5. Ammonium sulfate caused minor acidification of the herbicide solution, whereas urea did not change the pH. The use of CO2-pressurized sprayer had small effect on the solution's pH. Highest glyphosate efficacy identified after the addition of nitrogen fertilizers has little relation with changes on the solution's pH. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-11-18 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/1999/5741 https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/1999/1386 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.44, n.6, jun. 2009; 569-575 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.44, n.6, jun. 2009; 569-575 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416681017573376 |