Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cosenza, Gilson Westin
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Menezes Sobrinho, J. A. de, Regina, Sergio M., Gontijo, Vicente P.M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848
Resumo: Stored garlic (Allium sativum L.) is damaged by she insects Plodia interpunctella (Huber), Ephestia cautela (Walker), Ephestia alutella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), and Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera, Anthribidae), and the mite Eriophyes tulipae (Keifer 1938) (Acariformes, Eriophyidae). Phosphin and methyl bromide fumigants were tested at four dosage levels and three applications for protection of stored garlic. One sample treated with 4% malathion powder after fumigation and one untreated sample were included as checks. Fumigation plus malathion application showed to be efficient to protect stored garlic from moths and mites. Phosphin was as efficient as methyl bromide for the control of both insects and mites. Damage was less in the malathion treated sample (34.9% damaged bulbils by moths and 45% by mites). Both fumigants were effective in protecting stored garlic. However, methyl bromide at the dosage level of 15 cm3/m3 decreased bulbing of garlic.
id EMBRAPA-4_d83fd33435a09da8921909764ef95ec9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16848
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlicEfeito do expurgo sobre a preservação do alho armazenado(Allium sativum L.); pests; stored products(Allium sativum L.); pragas; produtos armazenadosStored garlic (Allium sativum L.) is damaged by she insects Plodia interpunctella (Huber), Ephestia cautela (Walker), Ephestia alutella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), and Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera, Anthribidae), and the mite Eriophyes tulipae (Keifer 1938) (Acariformes, Eriophyidae). Phosphin and methyl bromide fumigants were tested at four dosage levels and three applications for protection of stored garlic. One sample treated with 4% malathion powder after fumigation and one untreated sample were included as checks. Fumigation plus malathion application showed to be efficient to protect stored garlic from moths and mites. Phosphin was as efficient as methyl bromide for the control of both insects and mites. Damage was less in the malathion treated sample (34.9% damaged bulbils by moths and 45% by mites). Both fumigants were effective in protecting stored garlic. However, methyl bromide at the dosage level of 15 cm3/m3 decreased bulbing of garlic.O alho (Allium sativum L.) armazenado é praguejado pelos insetos Plodia interpunctella (Hubner), Ephestia cautella (Walker), Ephestia elutella (Hubner), (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera, Anthribidae), e pelo ácaro Eriophyes tulipae (Keifer 1938) (Acariformes, Eriophyidae). Testou-se o expurgo com brometo de metila e fosfina em quatro dosagens diferentes e três aplicações. Todas as parcelas expurgadas foram tratadas com malation 4% após o expurgo. Usaram-se duas testemunhas não expurgadas: uma, tratada com malation, pó, 4%, e outra, sem defensivo. O expurgo + malation demonstrou ser uma prática eficaz para proteger o alho armazenado dos ataques das traças e do ácaro. A fosfina e o brometo de meta igualaram-se no controle destas pragas; as dosagens de 5 cm3/m3 para o brometo e de uma pastilha/m3 para a fosfina foram suficientes numa única aplicação, no primeiro caso, e em três aplicações (outubro, dezembro e fevereiro) no segundo caso. Estas dosagens não prejudicaram a brotação, mas quando a dosagem de brometo de metila foi elevada para 15 cm3/m3, observou-se prejuízo na brotação. O malation, isoladamente, se bem que dando um controle superior à testemunha sem tratamento, não foi eficaz no controle das traças e do ácaro. A presença destas pragas nos bulbos não influenciou o número de brotos resultantes nem o seu peso.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCosenza, Gilson WestinMenezes Sobrinho, J. A. deRegina, Sergio M.Gontijo, Vicente P.M.2014-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.16, n.2, fev. 1981; 199-203Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.16, n.2, fev. 1981; 199-2031678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848/11174info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-15T19:39:03Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16848Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-15T19:39:03Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic
Efeito do expurgo sobre a preservação do alho armazenado
title Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic
spellingShingle Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic
Cosenza, Gilson Westin
(Allium sativum L.); pests; stored products
(Allium sativum L.); pragas; produtos armazenados
title_short Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic
title_full Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic
title_fullStr Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic
title_full_unstemmed Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic
title_sort Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic
author Cosenza, Gilson Westin
author_facet Cosenza, Gilson Westin
Menezes Sobrinho, J. A. de
Regina, Sergio M.
Gontijo, Vicente P.M.
author_role author
author2 Menezes Sobrinho, J. A. de
Regina, Sergio M.
Gontijo, Vicente P.M.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cosenza, Gilson Westin
Menezes Sobrinho, J. A. de
Regina, Sergio M.
Gontijo, Vicente P.M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv (Allium sativum L.); pests; stored products
(Allium sativum L.); pragas; produtos armazenados
topic (Allium sativum L.); pests; stored products
(Allium sativum L.); pragas; produtos armazenados
description Stored garlic (Allium sativum L.) is damaged by she insects Plodia interpunctella (Huber), Ephestia cautela (Walker), Ephestia alutella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), and Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera, Anthribidae), and the mite Eriophyes tulipae (Keifer 1938) (Acariformes, Eriophyidae). Phosphin and methyl bromide fumigants were tested at four dosage levels and three applications for protection of stored garlic. One sample treated with 4% malathion powder after fumigation and one untreated sample were included as checks. Fumigation plus malathion application showed to be efficient to protect stored garlic from moths and mites. Phosphin was as efficient as methyl bromide for the control of both insects and mites. Damage was less in the malathion treated sample (34.9% damaged bulbils by moths and 45% by mites). Both fumigants were effective in protecting stored garlic. However, methyl bromide at the dosage level of 15 cm3/m3 decreased bulbing of garlic.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848/11174
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.16, n.2, fev. 1981; 199-203
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.16, n.2, fev. 1981; 199-203
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416709288230912