Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848 |
Resumo: | Stored garlic (Allium sativum L.) is damaged by she insects Plodia interpunctella (Huber), Ephestia cautela (Walker), Ephestia alutella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), and Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera, Anthribidae), and the mite Eriophyes tulipae (Keifer 1938) (Acariformes, Eriophyidae). Phosphin and methyl bromide fumigants were tested at four dosage levels and three applications for protection of stored garlic. One sample treated with 4% malathion powder after fumigation and one untreated sample were included as checks. Fumigation plus malathion application showed to be efficient to protect stored garlic from moths and mites. Phosphin was as efficient as methyl bromide for the control of both insects and mites. Damage was less in the malathion treated sample (34.9% damaged bulbils by moths and 45% by mites). Both fumigants were effective in protecting stored garlic. However, methyl bromide at the dosage level of 15 cm3/m3 decreased bulbing of garlic. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_d83fd33435a09da8921909764ef95ec9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16848 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlicEfeito do expurgo sobre a preservação do alho armazenado(Allium sativum L.); pests; stored products(Allium sativum L.); pragas; produtos armazenadosStored garlic (Allium sativum L.) is damaged by she insects Plodia interpunctella (Huber), Ephestia cautela (Walker), Ephestia alutella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), and Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera, Anthribidae), and the mite Eriophyes tulipae (Keifer 1938) (Acariformes, Eriophyidae). Phosphin and methyl bromide fumigants were tested at four dosage levels and three applications for protection of stored garlic. One sample treated with 4% malathion powder after fumigation and one untreated sample were included as checks. Fumigation plus malathion application showed to be efficient to protect stored garlic from moths and mites. Phosphin was as efficient as methyl bromide for the control of both insects and mites. Damage was less in the malathion treated sample (34.9% damaged bulbils by moths and 45% by mites). Both fumigants were effective in protecting stored garlic. However, methyl bromide at the dosage level of 15 cm3/m3 decreased bulbing of garlic.O alho (Allium sativum L.) armazenado é praguejado pelos insetos Plodia interpunctella (Hubner), Ephestia cautella (Walker), Ephestia elutella (Hubner), (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera, Anthribidae), e pelo ácaro Eriophyes tulipae (Keifer 1938) (Acariformes, Eriophyidae). Testou-se o expurgo com brometo de metila e fosfina em quatro dosagens diferentes e três aplicações. Todas as parcelas expurgadas foram tratadas com malation 4% após o expurgo. Usaram-se duas testemunhas não expurgadas: uma, tratada com malation, pó, 4%, e outra, sem defensivo. O expurgo + malation demonstrou ser uma prática eficaz para proteger o alho armazenado dos ataques das traças e do ácaro. A fosfina e o brometo de meta igualaram-se no controle destas pragas; as dosagens de 5 cm3/m3 para o brometo e de uma pastilha/m3 para a fosfina foram suficientes numa única aplicação, no primeiro caso, e em três aplicações (outubro, dezembro e fevereiro) no segundo caso. Estas dosagens não prejudicaram a brotação, mas quando a dosagem de brometo de metila foi elevada para 15 cm3/m3, observou-se prejuízo na brotação. O malation, isoladamente, se bem que dando um controle superior à testemunha sem tratamento, não foi eficaz no controle das traças e do ácaro. A presença destas pragas nos bulbos não influenciou o número de brotos resultantes nem o seu peso.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCosenza, Gilson WestinMenezes Sobrinho, J. A. deRegina, Sergio M.Gontijo, Vicente P.M.2014-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.16, n.2, fev. 1981; 199-203Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.16, n.2, fev. 1981; 199-2031678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848/11174info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-15T19:39:03Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16848Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-15T19:39:03Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic Efeito do expurgo sobre a preservação do alho armazenado |
title |
Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic |
spellingShingle |
Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic Cosenza, Gilson Westin (Allium sativum L.); pests; stored products (Allium sativum L.); pragas; produtos armazenados |
title_short |
Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic |
title_full |
Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic |
title_fullStr |
Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic |
title_sort |
Effect of fumigation on the protection of stored garlic |
author |
Cosenza, Gilson Westin |
author_facet |
Cosenza, Gilson Westin Menezes Sobrinho, J. A. de Regina, Sergio M. Gontijo, Vicente P.M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Menezes Sobrinho, J. A. de Regina, Sergio M. Gontijo, Vicente P.M. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cosenza, Gilson Westin Menezes Sobrinho, J. A. de Regina, Sergio M. Gontijo, Vicente P.M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
(Allium sativum L.); pests; stored products (Allium sativum L.); pragas; produtos armazenados |
topic |
(Allium sativum L.); pests; stored products (Allium sativum L.); pragas; produtos armazenados |
description |
Stored garlic (Allium sativum L.) is damaged by she insects Plodia interpunctella (Huber), Ephestia cautela (Walker), Ephestia alutella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), and Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera, Anthribidae), and the mite Eriophyes tulipae (Keifer 1938) (Acariformes, Eriophyidae). Phosphin and methyl bromide fumigants were tested at four dosage levels and three applications for protection of stored garlic. One sample treated with 4% malathion powder after fumigation and one untreated sample were included as checks. Fumigation plus malathion application showed to be efficient to protect stored garlic from moths and mites. Phosphin was as efficient as methyl bromide for the control of both insects and mites. Damage was less in the malathion treated sample (34.9% damaged bulbils by moths and 45% by mites). Both fumigants were effective in protecting stored garlic. However, methyl bromide at the dosage level of 15 cm3/m3 decreased bulbing of garlic. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-15 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16848/11174 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.16, n.2, fev. 1981; 199-203 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.16, n.2, fev. 1981; 199-203 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416709288230912 |