Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillage
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1996 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4521 |
Resumo: | From 1984 to 1988, at the Cooperativa Agrária Mista Entre Rios Ltda., in Guarapuava, Paraná State, Brazil, the effect of crop rotation systems on wheat was assessed. Economic analysis for that period is presented in this paper. Four crop rotation systems for wheat were studied: 1) monoculture; 2) one winter without wheat; 3) two winters without wheat; 4) three winters without wheat. Both winter (oats, barley, common vetch, flax, wheat, and lupin) and summer (corn and soybean) crops were seeded under no-tillage. A randomized complete block design with four replications and plots with 60 m2 was used. Annual gross returns allow the conclusion that the economic analysis may contribute for understanding crop performance in different rotation systems. The results showed that, for the region studied, the system 2, 4 or 1 should be recomended for annual rotation. For winter cropping, the recomendation is the system 1 or 4. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_e5e602c41688f6813de18557d9b7cbbd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/4521 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillageRotação de culturas em Guarapuava. XV. Análise econômica de quatro sistemas de rotação de culturas para trigo em plantio diretooats; barley; common vetch; flax; corn; soybean; lupin; gross returnaveia; cevada; ervilhaca; linho; milho; soja; tremoço; margem brutaFrom 1984 to 1988, at the Cooperativa Agrária Mista Entre Rios Ltda., in Guarapuava, Paraná State, Brazil, the effect of crop rotation systems on wheat was assessed. Economic analysis for that period is presented in this paper. Four crop rotation systems for wheat were studied: 1) monoculture; 2) one winter without wheat; 3) two winters without wheat; 4) three winters without wheat. Both winter (oats, barley, common vetch, flax, wheat, and lupin) and summer (corn and soybean) crops were seeded under no-tillage. A randomized complete block design with four replications and plots with 60 m2 was used. Annual gross returns allow the conclusion that the economic analysis may contribute for understanding crop performance in different rotation systems. The results showed that, for the region studied, the system 2, 4 or 1 should be recomended for annual rotation. For winter cropping, the recomendation is the system 1 or 4. Durante os anos de 1984 a 1988, foram avaliados, na Cooperativa Agrária Mista Entre Rios Ltda., Guarapuava, PR, os efeitos das culturas que compõem os quatro sistemas de rotação para trigo. Neste trabalho, apresenta-se a análise econômica daquele período. Os tratamentos constaram de quatro sistemas de rotação de culturas para trigo: 1) monocultura; 2) um inverno sem trigo; 3) dois invernos sem trigo; e 4) três invernos sem trigo. Tanto as culturas de inverno (aveia, cevada, ervilhaca, linho, trigo e tremoço) quanto as de verão (milho e soja) foram estabelecidas em plantio direto. Utilizou-se no experimento o delineamento de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições e parcelas com área útil de 60 m2. As margens brutas anuais permitem concluir que a análise econômica pode contribuir para a compreensão do desempenho de culturas nos diferentes sistemas de rotação. Os resultados mostram que, na região indicada, devem ser recomendados para rotação anual os sistemas 2 ou 4 ou 1. No inverno, a recomendação recai no sistema 1 ou no 4.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirados Santos, Henrique PereiraReis, Erlei MeloAndia, Luiz Henrique1996-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4521Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.31, n.8, ago. 1996; 569-574Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.31, n.8, ago. 1996; 569-5741678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4521/1807info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-09-21T14:26:59Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/4521Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2015-09-21T14:26:59Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillage Rotação de culturas em Guarapuava. XV. Análise econômica de quatro sistemas de rotação de culturas para trigo em plantio direto |
title |
Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillage |
spellingShingle |
Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillage dos Santos, Henrique Pereira oats; barley; common vetch; flax; corn; soybean; lupin; gross return aveia; cevada; ervilhaca; linho; milho; soja; tremoço; margem bruta |
title_short |
Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillage |
title_full |
Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillage |
title_fullStr |
Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillage |
title_sort |
Crop rotation in Guarapuava. XV. Economic analysis of four rotation systems for wheat under no-tillage |
author |
dos Santos, Henrique Pereira |
author_facet |
dos Santos, Henrique Pereira Reis, Erlei Melo Andia, Luiz Henrique |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Reis, Erlei Melo Andia, Luiz Henrique |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
dos Santos, Henrique Pereira Reis, Erlei Melo Andia, Luiz Henrique |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
oats; barley; common vetch; flax; corn; soybean; lupin; gross return aveia; cevada; ervilhaca; linho; milho; soja; tremoço; margem bruta |
topic |
oats; barley; common vetch; flax; corn; soybean; lupin; gross return aveia; cevada; ervilhaca; linho; milho; soja; tremoço; margem bruta |
description |
From 1984 to 1988, at the Cooperativa Agrária Mista Entre Rios Ltda., in Guarapuava, Paraná State, Brazil, the effect of crop rotation systems on wheat was assessed. Economic analysis for that period is presented in this paper. Four crop rotation systems for wheat were studied: 1) monoculture; 2) one winter without wheat; 3) two winters without wheat; 4) three winters without wheat. Both winter (oats, barley, common vetch, flax, wheat, and lupin) and summer (corn and soybean) crops were seeded under no-tillage. A randomized complete block design with four replications and plots with 60 m2 was used. Annual gross returns allow the conclusion that the economic analysis may contribute for understanding crop performance in different rotation systems. The results showed that, for the region studied, the system 2, 4 or 1 should be recomended for annual rotation. For winter cropping, the recomendation is the system 1 or 4. |
publishDate |
1996 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1996-08-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4521 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4521 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4521/1807 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.31, n.8, ago. 1996; 569-574 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.31, n.8, ago. 1996; 569-574 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416688400596992 |