Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maize

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Portes, Tomás de Aquino
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Carvalho, José Ruy Porto de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15356
Resumo: Two bush and two climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars were sown in monocrop and intercrop with two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars, one short (Piranão and one tall (Ag-259). Until 25-35 days after emergence there was no difference in leaf area index (LAI). between the two crop systems. After this period, LAI values for Ag-259 were smaller in the intercrop than in the monocrop, but Piranão showed no difference. Thirty days after emergence, maize LAI became higher than in monocrop, and three to five times superior to those of beans. The climbing cultivars were less efficient than the bush ones. At tasseling, the maize intercepted nearly 80% of the light. Mean, maximum and minimum temperatures obtained inside the canopy were not different between intercrop and monocrop. Except for the bean cultivar California Small White, all bean yields in intercrop were lower than 50% of the monocrop yields. Maize yields were not significantly reduced.
id EMBRAPA-4_e6bc5fd6fe460594961aaa15ad82d118
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15356
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maizeÁrea foliar, radiação solar, temperatura do ar e rendimentos em consorciação e em monocultivo de diferentes cultivares de milho e feijãoleaf area index; leaf area efficiency; leaf area duration; light interception; intercrop yield; monocrop yieldíndice de área foliar; eficiência da área foliar; duração da área foliar; interceptação (intercepção) da luz; cultivo consorciadoTwo bush and two climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars were sown in monocrop and intercrop with two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars, one short (Piranão and one tall (Ag-259). Until 25-35 days after emergence there was no difference in leaf area index (LAI). between the two crop systems. After this period, LAI values for Ag-259 were smaller in the intercrop than in the monocrop, but Piranão showed no difference. Thirty days after emergence, maize LAI became higher than in monocrop, and three to five times superior to those of beans. The climbing cultivars were less efficient than the bush ones. At tasseling, the maize intercepted nearly 80% of the light. Mean, maximum and minimum temperatures obtained inside the canopy were not different between intercrop and monocrop. Except for the bean cultivar California Small White, all bean yields in intercrop were lower than 50% of the monocrop yields. Maize yields were not significantly reduced.Duas cultivares de feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) de hábito arbustivo (Turrialba-4 e Rio Tibagi) e duas de hábito trepador (Costa Rica-103 e California Small White) foram plantadas em monocultivo e em consorciação com duas cultivares de milho (Zea mays L.): uma, de porte baixo (Piranão), e outra, de porte alto (Ag-259). Até 25 a 35 dias após a emergência, não se observou diferença nos índices de área foliar (IAF) entre os dois sistemas de cultivo. Após esse período, a Ag-259 em consórcio apresentou IAF menor que em monocultivo; mas a Piranão não apresentou diferença. A partir do 30º dia, os índices de área foliar (IAF) das cultivares de milho passaram a ser superiores aos dos feijoeiros. As eficiências da área foliar (EAF) do milho consorciado foram menores que em monocultivo e três a cinco vezes maiores que as dos feijoeiros. As cultivares trepadoras foram menos eficientes que as arbustivas. Ao pendoamento, o milho interceptou cerca de 80% da luz. As temperaturas médias, máximas e mínimas na consorciação e no monocultivo não diferiram entre si. Os rendimentos das cultivares de feijão consorciado foram 50% mais baixo que em monocultivo, com exceção da California Small White. Os rendimentos do milho sofreram pequenas reduções.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraPortes, Tomás de AquinoCarvalho, José Ruy Porto de2014-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15356Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.18, n.7, jul. 1983; 755-762Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.18, n.7, jul. 1983; 755-7621678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15356/9228info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-16T18:59:42Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15356Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-16T18:59:42Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maize
Área foliar, radiação solar, temperatura do ar e rendimentos em consorciação e em monocultivo de diferentes cultivares de milho e feijão
title Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maize
spellingShingle Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maize
Portes, Tomás de Aquino
leaf area index; leaf area efficiency; leaf area duration; light interception; intercrop yield; monocrop yield
índice de área foliar; eficiência da área foliar; duração da área foliar; interceptação (intercepção) da luz; cultivo consorciado
title_short Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maize
title_full Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maize
title_fullStr Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maize
title_full_unstemmed Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maize
title_sort Leaf area, air temperature, and yield in monocropped and intercropped beans and maize
author Portes, Tomás de Aquino
author_facet Portes, Tomás de Aquino
Carvalho, José Ruy Porto de
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, José Ruy Porto de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Portes, Tomás de Aquino
Carvalho, José Ruy Porto de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv leaf area index; leaf area efficiency; leaf area duration; light interception; intercrop yield; monocrop yield
índice de área foliar; eficiência da área foliar; duração da área foliar; interceptação (intercepção) da luz; cultivo consorciado
topic leaf area index; leaf area efficiency; leaf area duration; light interception; intercrop yield; monocrop yield
índice de área foliar; eficiência da área foliar; duração da área foliar; interceptação (intercepção) da luz; cultivo consorciado
description Two bush and two climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars were sown in monocrop and intercrop with two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars, one short (Piranão and one tall (Ag-259). Until 25-35 days after emergence there was no difference in leaf area index (LAI). between the two crop systems. After this period, LAI values for Ag-259 were smaller in the intercrop than in the monocrop, but Piranão showed no difference. Thirty days after emergence, maize LAI became higher than in monocrop, and three to five times superior to those of beans. The climbing cultivars were less efficient than the bush ones. At tasseling, the maize intercepted nearly 80% of the light. Mean, maximum and minimum temperatures obtained inside the canopy were not different between intercrop and monocrop. Except for the bean cultivar California Small White, all bean yields in intercrop were lower than 50% of the monocrop yields. Maize yields were not significantly reduced.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15356
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15356
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15356/9228
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.18, n.7, jul. 1983; 755-762
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.18, n.7, jul. 1983; 755-762
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416709252579328