Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14760 |
Resumo: | Six field trials were carried out in Minas Gerais State, Brazil, during the 1982/1983 planting season, with the objective of determining the efficiency of insecticides against Scrobipalpula absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), recently related as attacking tomato plants in Brazil. The insecticide efficiency was evaluated through the observation of the attacked parts of the plant and the number of live and dead larvae. The most efficient insecticides were: permethrin, cartap, chlortiophos, triazophos and thiocyclam-hydrogenoxalate. Alternating permethrin and cartap was an efficient control measure. 'Gigante Kadá' was more resistant than 'Floradel'. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_ea79c53090ebd6f84f66f85ce379d4e0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/14760 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, BrazilControle da traça-do-tomateiro em Minas GeraisLepidoptera; Gelechiidae; Scrobipalpula absoluta; insecticidesLepídoptera; Gelechiidae; Scrotipalpula absoluta; inseticidasSix field trials were carried out in Minas Gerais State, Brazil, during the 1982/1983 planting season, with the objective of determining the efficiency of insecticides against Scrobipalpula absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), recently related as attacking tomato plants in Brazil. The insecticide efficiency was evaluated through the observation of the attacked parts of the plant and the number of live and dead larvae. The most efficient insecticides were: permethrin, cartap, chlortiophos, triazophos and thiocyclam-hydrogenoxalate. Alternating permethrin and cartap was an efficient control measure. 'Gigante Kadá' was more resistant than 'Floradel'.Foram realizados, em três localidades de Minas Gerais, no ano agrícola de 1982 a 1983, seis experimentos para avaliar eficiência de alguns defensivos agrícolas no combate â traça-do-tomateiro (Scrobipalpula absoluta (Mevrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), recentemente relatada atacando tomateiros (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) no Brasil. A avaliação foi feita observando-se as partes da planta atacadas pelo inseto e o número de larvas vivas e mortas. Foram eficientes os inseticidas: permetrin, cartape, clortiofós, triazofós e tiociclam-hidrogenoxalato. A alternância de cartape e permetrin mostrou ser uma prática eficiente no controle da traça. Ficou evidente a maior susceptibilidade da cultivar Floradel à traça-do-tomateiro em relação à cultivar Gigante Kadá.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraSouza, Júlio Cesar deReis, Paulo Rebelles2014-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14760Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.21, n.4, abr. 1986; 343-354Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.21, n.4, abr. 1986; 343-3541678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14760/8444info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-10-21T18:20:33Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/14760Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-10-21T18:20:33Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, Brazil Controle da traça-do-tomateiro em Minas Gerais |
title |
Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, Brazil Souza, Júlio Cesar de Lepidoptera; Gelechiidae; Scrobipalpula absoluta; insecticides Lepídoptera; Gelechiidae; Scrotipalpula absoluta; inseticidas |
title_short |
Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, Brazil |
title_full |
Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, Brazil |
title_sort |
Chemical control of tomato moth in Minas Gerais, Brazil |
author |
Souza, Júlio Cesar de |
author_facet |
Souza, Júlio Cesar de Reis, Paulo Rebelles |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Reis, Paulo Rebelles |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Júlio Cesar de Reis, Paulo Rebelles |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lepidoptera; Gelechiidae; Scrobipalpula absoluta; insecticides Lepídoptera; Gelechiidae; Scrotipalpula absoluta; inseticidas |
topic |
Lepidoptera; Gelechiidae; Scrobipalpula absoluta; insecticides Lepídoptera; Gelechiidae; Scrotipalpula absoluta; inseticidas |
description |
Six field trials were carried out in Minas Gerais State, Brazil, during the 1982/1983 planting season, with the objective of determining the efficiency of insecticides against Scrobipalpula absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), recently related as attacking tomato plants in Brazil. The insecticide efficiency was evaluated through the observation of the attacked parts of the plant and the number of live and dead larvae. The most efficient insecticides were: permethrin, cartap, chlortiophos, triazophos and thiocyclam-hydrogenoxalate. Alternating permethrin and cartap was an efficient control measure. 'Gigante Kadá' was more resistant than 'Floradel'. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-17 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14760 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14760 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14760/8444 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.21, n.4, abr. 1986; 343-354 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.21, n.4, abr. 1986; 343-354 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416677742870528 |