Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and corn
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22410 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of seed treatment with insecticides on the management of Dichelops melacanthus on the yield of soybean and corn, grown in succession. The study was carried out in a field, in the 2012/2013 (I) and 2013/2014 (II) crop seasons. The evaluated insecticides were: imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, thiodicarb, fipronil, and abamectin. The following were determined: stink bug population density, soybean and corn yield, and corn injury. Population density remained below one stink bug per square meter, in most of the soybean cycle. Population peaks were observed in the first weeks, after corn emergence, and they reached 2.2 (crop season I) and 6.7 (crop season II) stink bugs per square meter. In the soybean crop, the insecticides did not reduce the stink bug population density. In the corn crop, imidacloprid reduced the stink bug density in 23.2% (crop season I) and 38.8% (crop season II), and injury in 61.8% (crop season I) and 26.4% (crop season II). Thiamethoxam reduced the insect population density in 27.8% (crop season II) and injury in 42.7% (crop season I). Seed treatment with insecticides does not provide increase for soybean and corn yields, therefore, their use is not justified in this study's conditions. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_f6faf74bdf3f8137a8a5771f7db85791 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/22410 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and cornTratamento de sementes para manejo do percevejo‑barriga‑verde na cultura de soja e milho em sucessãoDichelops melacanthus; chemical control; population fluctuation; integrated pest managementDichelops melacanthus; controle químico; flutuação populacional; manejo integrado de pragasThe objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of seed treatment with insecticides on the management of Dichelops melacanthus on the yield of soybean and corn, grown in succession. The study was carried out in a field, in the 2012/2013 (I) and 2013/2014 (II) crop seasons. The evaluated insecticides were: imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, thiodicarb, fipronil, and abamectin. The following were determined: stink bug population density, soybean and corn yield, and corn injury. Population density remained below one stink bug per square meter, in most of the soybean cycle. Population peaks were observed in the first weeks, after corn emergence, and they reached 2.2 (crop season I) and 6.7 (crop season II) stink bugs per square meter. In the soybean crop, the insecticides did not reduce the stink bug population density. In the corn crop, imidacloprid reduced the stink bug density in 23.2% (crop season I) and 38.8% (crop season II), and injury in 61.8% (crop season I) and 26.4% (crop season II). Thiamethoxam reduced the insect population density in 27.8% (crop season II) and injury in 42.7% (crop season I). Seed treatment with insecticides does not provide increase for soybean and corn yields, therefore, their use is not justified in this study's conditions.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito do tratamento de sementes com inseticidas sobre o manejo de Dichelops melacanthus e a produtividade da soja e do milho, cultivados em sucessão. O estudo foi realizado em campo, nas safras 2012/2013 (I) e 2013/2014 (II). Avaliaram-se os inseticidas imidacloprido, tiametoxam, tiodicarbe, fipronil e abamectina. Determinaram-se: a densidade populacional do percevejo, a produtividade de soja e milho, e a intensidade da injúria em milho. A densidade do percevejo permaneceu abaixo de um inseto por metro quadrado, na maior parte do ciclo da soja. Os picos populacionais foram observados nas primeiras semanas, após a emergência do milho, e atingiram 2,2 (safra I) e 6,7 (safra II) percevejos por metro quadrado. Na cultura da soja, os inseticidas não reduziram a densidade populacional do percevejo. Na cultura do milho, o imidacloprido reduziu a densidade do percevejo em 23,2% (safra I) e 38,8% (safra II), e a injúria em 61,8% (safra I) e 26,4% (safra II). O tiametoxam reduziu a densidade dos insetos em 27,8% (safra II) e a injúria em 42,7% (safra I). O tratamento de sementes com inseticidas não proporciona aumento de produtividade à soja e ao milho, portanto, não se justifica sua utilização nas condições deste estudo.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraChiesa, Ana Carolina MontenegroSismeiro, Mariana Nunes dos SantosPasini, AmarildoRoggia, Samuel2016-07-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22410Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.4, abr. 2016; 301-308Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.4, abr. 2016; 301-3081678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22410/13265https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/22410/14430Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-07-04T21:50:30Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/22410Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2016-07-04T21:50:30Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and corn Tratamento de sementes para manejo do percevejo‑barriga‑verde na cultura de soja e milho em sucessão |
title |
Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and corn |
spellingShingle |
Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and corn Chiesa, Ana Carolina Montenegro Dichelops melacanthus; chemical control; population fluctuation; integrated pest management Dichelops melacanthus; controle químico; flutuação populacional; manejo integrado de pragas |
title_short |
Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and corn |
title_full |
Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and corn |
title_fullStr |
Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and corn |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and corn |
title_sort |
Seed treatment for management of the green‑belly stink bug in the crop succession of soybean and corn |
author |
Chiesa, Ana Carolina Montenegro |
author_facet |
Chiesa, Ana Carolina Montenegro Sismeiro, Mariana Nunes dos Santos Pasini, Amarildo Roggia, Samuel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sismeiro, Mariana Nunes dos Santos Pasini, Amarildo Roggia, Samuel |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chiesa, Ana Carolina Montenegro Sismeiro, Mariana Nunes dos Santos Pasini, Amarildo Roggia, Samuel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dichelops melacanthus; chemical control; population fluctuation; integrated pest management Dichelops melacanthus; controle químico; flutuação populacional; manejo integrado de pragas |
topic |
Dichelops melacanthus; chemical control; population fluctuation; integrated pest management Dichelops melacanthus; controle químico; flutuação populacional; manejo integrado de pragas |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of seed treatment with insecticides on the management of Dichelops melacanthus on the yield of soybean and corn, grown in succession. The study was carried out in a field, in the 2012/2013 (I) and 2013/2014 (II) crop seasons. The evaluated insecticides were: imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, thiodicarb, fipronil, and abamectin. The following were determined: stink bug population density, soybean and corn yield, and corn injury. Population density remained below one stink bug per square meter, in most of the soybean cycle. Population peaks were observed in the first weeks, after corn emergence, and they reached 2.2 (crop season I) and 6.7 (crop season II) stink bugs per square meter. In the soybean crop, the insecticides did not reduce the stink bug population density. In the corn crop, imidacloprid reduced the stink bug density in 23.2% (crop season I) and 38.8% (crop season II), and injury in 61.8% (crop season I) and 26.4% (crop season II). Thiamethoxam reduced the insect population density in 27.8% (crop season II) and injury in 42.7% (crop season I). Seed treatment with insecticides does not provide increase for soybean and corn yields, therefore, their use is not justified in this study's conditions. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22410 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22410 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/22410/13265 https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/22410/14430 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.51, n.4, abr. 2016; 301-308 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.51, n.4, abr. 2016; 301-308 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416691799031808 |