Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/670 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was the comparison of vegetation structure of two Caatinga fragments with primary and secondary levels of ecological succession, located at Embrapa Semiarido, Petrolina, State of Pernambuco, Brazil. For floristic survey it was used the method of plots, where 10 sampling units of 8 m x 40 m randomly distributed were plotted. All living individuals with diameter at ground level (DGL) ≥ 3 cm were inventoried and also measured their total heights. We observed significant differences in the diametric structure, but the distribution of hypsometric frequency showed that the majority of individuals in both areas were small-sized (< 5 m). Through similarity analysis and principal coordinates, we observed the formation of three distinct groups when compared to other surveys in Caatinga sensu stricto. The results showed that the studied areas have floristic richness compatible with Caatinga environments, the fragments are in early stages (Area I) and intermediate succession (Area II) and 30 years of regeneration were not enough for area I to achieve a level of development similar to the ecologically better conserved area. |
id |
EMBRAPA-5_021be6baa810f48c30f2bedf58300c85 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/670 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-5 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservationEstudo comparativo da estrutura fitossociológica de dois fragmentos de Caatinga em níveis diferentes de conservaçãoThorny deciduous vegetationPhytosociologyEcological sucessionVegetação caducifólia espinhosaFitossociologiaSucessão ecológicaThe objective of this work was the comparison of vegetation structure of two Caatinga fragments with primary and secondary levels of ecological succession, located at Embrapa Semiarido, Petrolina, State of Pernambuco, Brazil. For floristic survey it was used the method of plots, where 10 sampling units of 8 m x 40 m randomly distributed were plotted. All living individuals with diameter at ground level (DGL) ≥ 3 cm were inventoried and also measured their total heights. We observed significant differences in the diametric structure, but the distribution of hypsometric frequency showed that the majority of individuals in both areas were small-sized (< 5 m). Through similarity analysis and principal coordinates, we observed the formation of three distinct groups when compared to other surveys in Caatinga sensu stricto. The results showed that the studied areas have floristic richness compatible with Caatinga environments, the fragments are in early stages (Area I) and intermediate succession (Area II) and 30 years of regeneration were not enough for area I to achieve a level of development similar to the ecologically better conserved area.Objetivou-se neste trabalho, o comparativo da estrutura fitossociológica de dois fragmentos de Caatinga com níveis de sucessão ecológica primária e secundária localizados na Embrapa Semiárido, Petrolina, PE. No levantamento florístico utilizouse o método das parcelas, onde foram plotadas 10 unidades amostrais de 8 m x 40 m distribuídas de forma aleatória. Todos os indivíduos vivos com diâmetro ao nível do solo (DNS) ≥ 3 cm foram inventariados, sendo medidas também as suas alturas totais. Observaram-se diferenças significativas na estrutura diamétrica, mas a distribuição da frequência hipsométrica mostrou que a maioria dos indivíduos nas duas áreas apresentou pequeno porte (< 5 m). Através da análise de similaridade e das coordenadas principais observou-se a formação de três grupos distintos quando comparadas a outros levantamentos em Caatinga sensu stricto. Os resultados evidenciaram que as áreas estudadas apresentam riqueza de espécies compatível a ambientes de Caatinga, que os fragmentos se encontram em estádio inicial (Área I) e intermediário de sucessão (Área II) e que 30 anos de regeneração não foram suficientes para a Área I alcançar um nível de desenvolvimento ecológico semelhante à área melhor conservada.Embrapa Florestas2014-12-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/67010.4336/2014.pfb.34.80.670Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 34 n. 80 (2014): out./dez.; 345-355Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 34 No. 80 (2014): out./dez.; 345-3551983-26051809-3647reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/670/384Calixto Júnior, João TavaresDrumond, Marcos Antônioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-04-28T12:49:00Zoai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/670Revistahttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/PUBhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/oaipfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br1983-26051809-3647opendoar:2017-04-28T12:49Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation Estudo comparativo da estrutura fitossociológica de dois fragmentos de Caatinga em níveis diferentes de conservação |
title |
Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation Calixto Júnior, João Tavares Thorny deciduous vegetation Phytosociology Ecological sucession Vegetação caducifólia espinhosa Fitossociologia Sucessão ecológica |
title_short |
Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation |
title_full |
Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation |
title_sort |
Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation |
author |
Calixto Júnior, João Tavares |
author_facet |
Calixto Júnior, João Tavares Drumond, Marcos Antônio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Drumond, Marcos Antônio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Calixto Júnior, João Tavares Drumond, Marcos Antônio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Thorny deciduous vegetation Phytosociology Ecological sucession Vegetação caducifólia espinhosa Fitossociologia Sucessão ecológica |
topic |
Thorny deciduous vegetation Phytosociology Ecological sucession Vegetação caducifólia espinhosa Fitossociologia Sucessão ecológica |
description |
The objective of this work was the comparison of vegetation structure of two Caatinga fragments with primary and secondary levels of ecological succession, located at Embrapa Semiarido, Petrolina, State of Pernambuco, Brazil. For floristic survey it was used the method of plots, where 10 sampling units of 8 m x 40 m randomly distributed were plotted. All living individuals with diameter at ground level (DGL) ≥ 3 cm were inventoried and also measured their total heights. We observed significant differences in the diametric structure, but the distribution of hypsometric frequency showed that the majority of individuals in both areas were small-sized (< 5 m). Through similarity analysis and principal coordinates, we observed the formation of three distinct groups when compared to other surveys in Caatinga sensu stricto. The results showed that the studied areas have floristic richness compatible with Caatinga environments, the fragments are in early stages (Area I) and intermediate succession (Area II) and 30 years of regeneration were not enough for area I to achieve a level of development similar to the ecologically better conserved area. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/670 10.4336/2014.pfb.34.80.670 |
url |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/670 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4336/2014.pfb.34.80.670 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/670/384 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 34 n. 80 (2014): out./dez.; 345-355 Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 34 No. 80 (2014): out./dez.; 345-355 1983-2605 1809-3647 reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1783370934346842112 |