Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volume

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Berra, Elias Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Fontana, Denise Cybis, Kuplich, Tatiana Mora
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1134
Resumo: After Landsat 5 activities were discontinued, sensors on board ResourceSat-1 satellite have been pointed as an option for Landsat series. The aim of this study is to estimate timber volume from a slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) stand using images from both LISS-III/ResourceSat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 sensors, cross comparing their performances. Reflectance values from the four spectral bands considered equivalent for both sensors were compared regarding sensitivity to changes in timber volume. Trends were similar, with direct relationship in the near-infrared bands and inverse relationships in the visible and mid-infrared bands. Significant differences were only found in the equivalent band of green. Multiple linear regressions were used to select spectral bands that would better explain variations in timber volume. The best fit equations for each sensor were inverted to generate maps of timber volume, estimates which were compared at pixel and stand level. None of the scales showed significant differences between estimates generated from the two sensors. We concluded that LISS-III and TM have generally very similar performance for monitoring timber volume, and LISS-III could therefore be potentially used as a complement or substitute to Landsat series.
id EMBRAPA-5_43444d03eab1450e092c3ae6e719aab2
oai_identifier_str oai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/1134
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-5
network_name_str Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volumeComparação das imagens de satélite LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 e TM/Landsat 5 para estimar volume de madeira de talhões florestaisPinus elliottiiReflectânciaInventário florestalPinus elliottiiReflectanceForest inventoryAfter Landsat 5 activities were discontinued, sensors on board ResourceSat-1 satellite have been pointed as an option for Landsat series. The aim of this study is to estimate timber volume from a slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) stand using images from both LISS-III/ResourceSat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 sensors, cross comparing their performances. Reflectance values from the four spectral bands considered equivalent for both sensors were compared regarding sensitivity to changes in timber volume. Trends were similar, with direct relationship in the near-infrared bands and inverse relationships in the visible and mid-infrared bands. Significant differences were only found in the equivalent band of green. Multiple linear regressions were used to select spectral bands that would better explain variations in timber volume. The best fit equations for each sensor were inverted to generate maps of timber volume, estimates which were compared at pixel and stand level. None of the scales showed significant differences between estimates generated from the two sensors. We concluded that LISS-III and TM have generally very similar performance for monitoring timber volume, and LISS-III could therefore be potentially used as a complement or substitute to Landsat series.Após a interrupção das atividades do Landsat 5, sensores a bordo do satélite ResourceSat-1 têm sido apontados como uma opção à série Landsat. O objetivo deste estudo é estimar volume de madeira de pinus (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) por meio de imagens dos sensores LISS-III/ResourceSat-1 e TM/Landsat 5, comparando suas performances. Valores de reflectância das quatro bandas espectrais equivalentes em ambos os sensores foram comparados quanto à sensibilidade a mudanças no volume de madeira. As tendências foram similares com relações diretas nas bandas do infravermelho próximo e relações inversas nas bandas do visível e infravermelho médio. Diferenças significativas foram encontradas somente nas bandas equivalentes do verde. Regressões lineares múltiplas foram aplicadas para selecionar as bandas espectrais que melhor explicariam as variações em volume de madeira. As equações com melhores ajustes para cada sensor foram invertidas para gerar mapas de volume de madeira, cujas estimativas foram comparadas à escala de pixel e de talhão. Nenhuma das escalas mostrou diferenças significativas entre as estimativas geradas pelos dois sensores. Concluiu-se que os sensores LISS-III e TM apresentam, em geral, desempenho muito similar para monitoramento de volume de madeira, e que o LISS-III poderia, consequentemente, ser usado em complemento ou em substituição à série Landsat.Embrapa Florestas2016-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/113410.4336/2016.pfb.36.88.1134Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 36 n. 88 (2016): out./dez.; 363-373Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 36 No. 88 (2016): out./dez.; 363-3731983-26051809-3647reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1134/528Copyright (c) 2016 Elias Fernando Berra, Denise Cybis Fontana, Tatiana Mora Kuplichhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBerra, Elias FernandoFontana, Denise CybisKuplich, Tatiana Mora2017-04-28T14:13:33Zoai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/1134Revistahttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/PUBhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/oaipfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br1983-26051809-3647opendoar:2017-04-28T14:13:33Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volume
Comparação das imagens de satélite LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 e TM/Landsat 5 para estimar volume de madeira de talhões florestais
title Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volume
spellingShingle Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volume
Berra, Elias Fernando
Pinus elliottii
Reflectância
Inventário florestal
Pinus elliottii
Reflectance
Forest inventory
title_short Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volume
title_full Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volume
title_fullStr Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volume
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volume
title_sort Comparison of satellite imagery from LISS-III/Resourcesat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 to estimate stand-level timber volume
author Berra, Elias Fernando
author_facet Berra, Elias Fernando
Fontana, Denise Cybis
Kuplich, Tatiana Mora
author_role author
author2 Fontana, Denise Cybis
Kuplich, Tatiana Mora
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Berra, Elias Fernando
Fontana, Denise Cybis
Kuplich, Tatiana Mora
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pinus elliottii
Reflectância
Inventário florestal
Pinus elliottii
Reflectance
Forest inventory
topic Pinus elliottii
Reflectância
Inventário florestal
Pinus elliottii
Reflectance
Forest inventory
description After Landsat 5 activities were discontinued, sensors on board ResourceSat-1 satellite have been pointed as an option for Landsat series. The aim of this study is to estimate timber volume from a slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) stand using images from both LISS-III/ResourceSat-1 and TM/Landsat 5 sensors, cross comparing their performances. Reflectance values from the four spectral bands considered equivalent for both sensors were compared regarding sensitivity to changes in timber volume. Trends were similar, with direct relationship in the near-infrared bands and inverse relationships in the visible and mid-infrared bands. Significant differences were only found in the equivalent band of green. Multiple linear regressions were used to select spectral bands that would better explain variations in timber volume. The best fit equations for each sensor were inverted to generate maps of timber volume, estimates which were compared at pixel and stand level. None of the scales showed significant differences between estimates generated from the two sensors. We concluded that LISS-III and TM have generally very similar performance for monitoring timber volume, and LISS-III could therefore be potentially used as a complement or substitute to Landsat series.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1134
10.4336/2016.pfb.36.88.1134
url https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1134
identifier_str_mv 10.4336/2016.pfb.36.88.1134
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1134/528
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Elias Fernando Berra, Denise Cybis Fontana, Tatiana Mora Kuplich
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Elias Fernando Berra, Denise Cybis Fontana, Tatiana Mora Kuplich
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Embrapa Florestas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Embrapa Florestas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 36 n. 88 (2016): out./dez.; 363-373
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 36 No. 88 (2016): out./dez.; 363-373
1983-2605
1809-3647
reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br
_version_ 1783370935830577152