Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnats
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1786 |
Resumo: | The evaluation of adhesive trap is a time-consuming task, vulnerable to count errors. Our proposition originated from the need to perform periodical evaluations of fungus-gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae). We selected, at random, 100 traps samples from a single site. Manual counting was performed and the traps were subsequently submitted to digitalization and automatic counting. We perform comparisons of both counting methods using R. The proposed automatic based approach is more expeditious in analyzing bigger samples or in including larger areas. |
id |
EMBRAPA-5_5ea71b6bd37b8408d6a21e527a591f7c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/1786 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-5 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnatsValidação de contagem automática de insetos em armadilhas adesivas amarelas para fungus-gnatsSciaridaeInsect samplingAutomationSciaridaeAmostragem de insetosAutomatizaçãoThe evaluation of adhesive trap is a time-consuming task, vulnerable to count errors. Our proposition originated from the need to perform periodical evaluations of fungus-gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae). We selected, at random, 100 traps samples from a single site. Manual counting was performed and the traps were subsequently submitted to digitalization and automatic counting. We perform comparisons of both counting methods using R. The proposed automatic based approach is more expeditious in analyzing bigger samples or in including larger areas.A avaliação de insetos pragas por armadilhas adesivas é uma tarefa demorada, sujeita a erros de contagem. Nossa proposição originou-se da necessidade de realizar avaliações periódicas de infestações de mosquitos (Diptera: Sciaridae). Foram selecionadas 100 armadilhas, em um único local. A contagem manual foi realizada e as armadilhas foram posteriormente submetidas à digitalização e contagem automática. O programa R foi utilizado para comparação entre os métodos de contagem considerados. A abordagem automática sugerida, quando comparada à tradicional, permite esforços de amostragem mais rápidos, maiores coleções de registros de dados ou ainda maiores áreas amostradas em menos tempo.Embrapa Florestas2019-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/178610.4336/2019.pfb.39e201801786Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 39 (2019)Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 39 (2019)1983-26051809-3647reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1786/903https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchuhli, Guilherme Schnell eda Cruz, Pedro CazettaFranciscon, LuzianeOliveira, Edilson Batista de2019-12-31T20:35:27Zoai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/1786Revistahttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/PUBhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/oaipfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br1983-26051809-3647opendoar:2019-12-31T20:35:27Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnats Validação de contagem automática de insetos em armadilhas adesivas amarelas para fungus-gnats |
title |
Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnats |
spellingShingle |
Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnats Schuhli, Guilherme Schnell e Sciaridae Insect sampling Automation Sciaridae Amostragem de insetos Automatização |
title_short |
Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnats |
title_full |
Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnats |
title_fullStr |
Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnats |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnats |
title_sort |
Validation of an automatic evaluation of sticky traps for fungus-gnats |
author |
Schuhli, Guilherme Schnell e |
author_facet |
Schuhli, Guilherme Schnell e da Cruz, Pedro Cazetta Franciscon, Luziane Oliveira, Edilson Batista de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
da Cruz, Pedro Cazetta Franciscon, Luziane Oliveira, Edilson Batista de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schuhli, Guilherme Schnell e da Cruz, Pedro Cazetta Franciscon, Luziane Oliveira, Edilson Batista de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sciaridae Insect sampling Automation Sciaridae Amostragem de insetos Automatização |
topic |
Sciaridae Insect sampling Automation Sciaridae Amostragem de insetos Automatização |
description |
The evaluation of adhesive trap is a time-consuming task, vulnerable to count errors. Our proposition originated from the need to perform periodical evaluations of fungus-gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae). We selected, at random, 100 traps samples from a single site. Manual counting was performed and the traps were subsequently submitted to digitalization and automatic counting. We perform comparisons of both counting methods using R. The proposed automatic based approach is more expeditious in analyzing bigger samples or in including larger areas. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1786 10.4336/2019.pfb.39e201801786 |
url |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1786 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4336/2019.pfb.39e201801786 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1786/903 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 39 (2019) Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 39 (2019) 1983-2605 1809-3647 reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1783370936883347456 |