Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/512 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate different densities of rootedproductivity and survival as well as the effects on production and survival of cuttings produced. We performed two separate experiments, one for each genetic material (C1 and C2) and were assessed three densities for clone C1 (88, 75 and 57 ministumps m-2) and two for clone C2 (104 and 78 ministumps m-2). Shoots we collected from the ministumps and they were used in making cuttings 6-10 cm long. Sampling was initiated in January 2011, ending in March 2011. The cuttings were planted in substrate composed of 50% vermiculite and 50% of rice hulls and subsequently they were conducted in following steps: greenhouse, shade house and field hardening. For both clones, the density with smaller number of mini-stumps m-2 resulted in lower mortality rate of mini-stumps and higher production of mini-cuttings. The survival of mini-cuttings in the first selection (when exiting from the shade) and the second selection of seedlings (50 days after planting) was not affected by the spacing given the mini-stumps. |
id |
EMBRAPA-5_80e69f8b5d84062630dae50fdff755b4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/512 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-5 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptusDensidade de minicepas em minijardim clonal na produção de mudas de eucaliptoMini-cutting techniqueVegetative propagationClonal forestryMiniestaquiaPropagação vegetativaSilvicultura clonalThe objective of this work was to evaluate different densities of rootedproductivity and survival as well as the effects on production and survival of cuttings produced. We performed two separate experiments, one for each genetic material (C1 and C2) and were assessed three densities for clone C1 (88, 75 and 57 ministumps m-2) and two for clone C2 (104 and 78 ministumps m-2). Shoots we collected from the ministumps and they were used in making cuttings 6-10 cm long. Sampling was initiated in January 2011, ending in March 2011. The cuttings were planted in substrate composed of 50% vermiculite and 50% of rice hulls and subsequently they were conducted in following steps: greenhouse, shade house and field hardening. For both clones, the density with smaller number of mini-stumps m-2 resulted in lower mortality rate of mini-stumps and higher production of mini-cuttings. The survival of mini-cuttings in the first selection (when exiting from the shade) and the second selection of seedlings (50 days after planting) was not affected by the spacing given the mini-stumps.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar diferentes densidades de minicepas quanto à produtividade e sobrevivência bem como os efeitos na produção e sobrevivência das miniestacas produzidas. Foram realizados dois experimentos distintos, um para cada material genético (C1 e C2) e foram avaliadas três densidades para o clone C1 (88, 75 e 57 minicepas m-2) e duas para o clone C2 (104 e 78 minicepas m-2). Foram coletadas brotações das minicepas, utilizadas na confecção de miniestacas de 6 a 10 cm de comprimento. As coletas foram iniciadas em janeiro de 2011, encerrando-se em março de 2011. As miniestacas foram plantadas em substrato composto por 50% de vermiculita e 50% de casca de arroz carbonizada sendo posteriormente conduzidas às seguintes etapas: casa de vegetação, casa de sombra e área de rustificação. Para os dois clones, a densidade com menor número de minicepas m-2 resultou em menor taxa de mortalidade das minicepas e maior produção de miniestacas por minicepa. A sobrevivência das miniestacas na primeira seleção (após a saída da casa de sombra) e das mudas na segunda seleção (50 dias após o plantio) não foi afetada pelo espaçamento utilizado para as minicepas.Embrapa Florestas2014-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/51210.4336/2014.pfb.34.77.512Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 34 n. 77 (2014): jan./mar.; 49-56Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 34 No. 77 (2014): jan./mar.; 49-561983-26051809-3647reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/512/356Souza, Cibele ChavesXavier, AloisioLeite, Fernando PalhaSantana, Reynaldo CamposPaiva, Haroldo Nogueira deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-04-28T12:47:45Zoai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/512Revistahttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/PUBhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/oaipfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br1983-26051809-3647opendoar:2017-04-28T12:47:45Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptus Densidade de minicepas em minijardim clonal na produção de mudas de eucalipto |
title |
Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptus |
spellingShingle |
Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptus Souza, Cibele Chaves Mini-cutting technique Vegetative propagation Clonal forestry Miniestaquia Propagação vegetativa Silvicultura clonal |
title_short |
Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptus |
title_full |
Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptus |
title_fullStr |
Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptus |
title_sort |
Density mini-stumps on mini-clonal hedge in the production of clonal seedlings eucalyptus |
author |
Souza, Cibele Chaves |
author_facet |
Souza, Cibele Chaves Xavier, Aloisio Leite, Fernando Palha Santana, Reynaldo Campos Paiva, Haroldo Nogueira de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Xavier, Aloisio Leite, Fernando Palha Santana, Reynaldo Campos Paiva, Haroldo Nogueira de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Cibele Chaves Xavier, Aloisio Leite, Fernando Palha Santana, Reynaldo Campos Paiva, Haroldo Nogueira de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mini-cutting technique Vegetative propagation Clonal forestry Miniestaquia Propagação vegetativa Silvicultura clonal |
topic |
Mini-cutting technique Vegetative propagation Clonal forestry Miniestaquia Propagação vegetativa Silvicultura clonal |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate different densities of rootedproductivity and survival as well as the effects on production and survival of cuttings produced. We performed two separate experiments, one for each genetic material (C1 and C2) and were assessed three densities for clone C1 (88, 75 and 57 ministumps m-2) and two for clone C2 (104 and 78 ministumps m-2). Shoots we collected from the ministumps and they were used in making cuttings 6-10 cm long. Sampling was initiated in January 2011, ending in March 2011. The cuttings were planted in substrate composed of 50% vermiculite and 50% of rice hulls and subsequently they were conducted in following steps: greenhouse, shade house and field hardening. For both clones, the density with smaller number of mini-stumps m-2 resulted in lower mortality rate of mini-stumps and higher production of mini-cuttings. The survival of mini-cuttings in the first selection (when exiting from the shade) and the second selection of seedlings (50 days after planting) was not affected by the spacing given the mini-stumps. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/512 10.4336/2014.pfb.34.77.512 |
url |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/512 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4336/2014.pfb.34.77.512 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/512/356 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 34 n. 77 (2014): jan./mar.; 49-56 Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 34 No. 77 (2014): jan./mar.; 49-56 1983-2605 1809-3647 reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1783370934222061568 |