Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traits
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/920 |
Resumo: | The proposal of this study was to estimate the genetic divergence among Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies through quantitative traits. Trail was established in lattice design 10 x 10, triple, with 100 treatments (96 progenies from clonal seed orchard of P. caribaea var. hondurensis and four controls). The genetic divergence was estimated using the generalized Mahalanobis distance (D2) and Torcher’s optimization method. Diameter at 1.30 above the ground, total plant height, cylindrical volume, total resin production and resin per panel area were evaluated. The largest genetic distance observed between the progenies was 100% (D2 = 65.51) and the lowest was 0,09% (D2 = 0.15). Clustering by Torcher’s optimization method separated the progeny in four groups, with a concentration of 96.9% of the progenies in a single group. Volume was the largest contributor to the genetic divergence among groups. To include these progeny in breeding programs for resin and wood production controlled crossings should be prioritized among the most productive individuals that presented greater genetic divergence. |
id |
EMBRAPA-5_ce18e78a2feffaffcf68f7b286ba4a8b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/920 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-5 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traitsDivergência genética entre progênies de polinização aberta de Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis a partir de caracteres quantitativosMelhoramento genéticoDistância generalizada de MahalanobisOtimização de TocherGenetic breedingGeneralized Mahalanobis distanceTocher optimizationThe proposal of this study was to estimate the genetic divergence among Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies through quantitative traits. Trail was established in lattice design 10 x 10, triple, with 100 treatments (96 progenies from clonal seed orchard of P. caribaea var. hondurensis and four controls). The genetic divergence was estimated using the generalized Mahalanobis distance (D2) and Torcher’s optimization method. Diameter at 1.30 above the ground, total plant height, cylindrical volume, total resin production and resin per panel area were evaluated. The largest genetic distance observed between the progenies was 100% (D2 = 65.51) and the lowest was 0,09% (D2 = 0.15). Clustering by Torcher’s optimization method separated the progeny in four groups, with a concentration of 96.9% of the progenies in a single group. Volume was the largest contributor to the genetic divergence among groups. To include these progeny in breeding programs for resin and wood production controlled crossings should be prioritized among the most productive individuals that presented greater genetic divergence.Este trabalho foi realizado com o objetivo de estimar a divergência genética entre progênies de Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis, por meio de caracteres quantitativos. O experimento foi instalado em delineamento látice 10 x 10, triplo, com 100 tratamentos (96 progênies oriundas de polinização aberta de um pomar clonal da espécie e quatro testemunhas). Foram avaliados os caracteres: diâmetro a 1,30 m do solo, altura total de planta, volume cilíndrico, produção de resina total e resina por área de painel. Utilizou-se a distância generalizada de Mahalanobis (D2) e o método de otimização de Tocher. A maior distância genética observada entre as progênies foi de 100% (D2 = 65,51) e a menor foi de 0,09% (D2 = 0,15). O caractere volume foi o que mais contribuiu para a divergência genética entre os grupos avaliados. O agrupamento a partir do método de otimização de Tocher possibilitou a separação das progênies em quatro grupos, com concentração de 96,9% das progênies em um único grupo. Para que estas progênies possam ser incluídas em programas de melhoramento genético para produção de resina e madeira, cruzamentos controlados deverão ser priorizados entre indivíduos mais produtivos, que apresentaram maior divergência genética.Embrapa Florestas2023-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/92010.4336/2016.pfb.36.86.920Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 36 n. 86 (2016): abr./jun.; 127-133Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 36 No. 86 (2016): abr./jun.; 127-1331983-26051809-3647reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/920/502https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/920/1279Copyright (c) 2016 Wanderley dos Santos, Elton Gean Araújo, Danilla Cristina Lemos Souza, Janaína Rodrigues da Silva, Camila Regina Silva Baleroni Recco, Mário Luiz Teixeira de Moraes, Ananda Virginia de Aguiarhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Wanderley dosAraújo, Elton GeanSouza, Danilla Cristina LemosSilva, Janaína Rodrigues daRecco, Camila Regina Silva BaleroniMoraes, Mário Luiz Teixeira deAguiar, Ananda Virginia de2023-03-16T12:50:18Zoai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/920Revistahttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/PUBhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/oaipfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br1983-26051809-3647opendoar:2023-03-16T12:50:18Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traits Divergência genética entre progênies de polinização aberta de Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis a partir de caracteres quantitativos |
title |
Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traits |
spellingShingle |
Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traits Santos, Wanderley dos Melhoramento genético Distância generalizada de Mahalanobis Otimização de Tocher Genetic breeding Generalized Mahalanobis distance Tocher optimization |
title_short |
Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traits |
title_full |
Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traits |
title_fullStr |
Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traits |
title_full_unstemmed |
Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traits |
title_sort |
Genetic divergence genetic between Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies based on quantitative traits |
author |
Santos, Wanderley dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Wanderley dos Araújo, Elton Gean Souza, Danilla Cristina Lemos Silva, Janaína Rodrigues da Recco, Camila Regina Silva Baleroni Moraes, Mário Luiz Teixeira de Aguiar, Ananda Virginia de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Araújo, Elton Gean Souza, Danilla Cristina Lemos Silva, Janaína Rodrigues da Recco, Camila Regina Silva Baleroni Moraes, Mário Luiz Teixeira de Aguiar, Ananda Virginia de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Wanderley dos Araújo, Elton Gean Souza, Danilla Cristina Lemos Silva, Janaína Rodrigues da Recco, Camila Regina Silva Baleroni Moraes, Mário Luiz Teixeira de Aguiar, Ananda Virginia de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Melhoramento genético Distância generalizada de Mahalanobis Otimização de Tocher Genetic breeding Generalized Mahalanobis distance Tocher optimization |
topic |
Melhoramento genético Distância generalizada de Mahalanobis Otimização de Tocher Genetic breeding Generalized Mahalanobis distance Tocher optimization |
description |
The proposal of this study was to estimate the genetic divergence among Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis progenies through quantitative traits. Trail was established in lattice design 10 x 10, triple, with 100 treatments (96 progenies from clonal seed orchard of P. caribaea var. hondurensis and four controls). The genetic divergence was estimated using the generalized Mahalanobis distance (D2) and Torcher’s optimization method. Diameter at 1.30 above the ground, total plant height, cylindrical volume, total resin production and resin per panel area were evaluated. The largest genetic distance observed between the progenies was 100% (D2 = 65.51) and the lowest was 0,09% (D2 = 0.15). Clustering by Torcher’s optimization method separated the progeny in four groups, with a concentration of 96.9% of the progenies in a single group. Volume was the largest contributor to the genetic divergence among groups. To include these progeny in breeding programs for resin and wood production controlled crossings should be prioritized among the most productive individuals that presented greater genetic divergence. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/920 10.4336/2016.pfb.36.86.920 |
url |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/920 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4336/2016.pfb.36.86.920 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/920/502 https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/920/1279 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 36 n. 86 (2016): abr./jun.; 127-133 Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 36 No. 86 (2016): abr./jun.; 127-133 1983-2605 1809-3647 reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1783370931724353536 |