Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1095966 |
Resumo: | The effect of injectable progesterone was evaluated along with estradiol benzoate (EB) on the fate of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary at the beginning of low progesterone-based TAI protocol. All cattle were given 500 µg cloprostenol im (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice, 11 d apart, and allocated into two groups: Estradiol group (E group, n = 11) and Estradiol-Progesterone group (EP group, n = 11). Ten days after the second PGF (Day 0), all cattle were given an intravaginal progesterone device with half progesterone concentration (Cue-Mate with a single pod containing 0.78 g progesterone). Concurrently, all cattle were given 1.5 mg im of estradiol benzoate in 3 mL of canola oil and PGF im on Day 0 of the protocol in a crossover design, in which each cow received both treatments. Cows in the EP group also received 100 mg im progesterone (Sigma) in 2 mL of canola oil. On Day 8, progesterone devices were removed and all cattle were given PGF im. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.0. The DF present on Day 0 ovulated in 76% (16/21) of cows from E group and 28.6% (6/21) of cows from EP group (P = 0.002). After progesterone device removal, the size of ovulatory follicle did not differ between groups (E group, 15.5 ± 0.43 mm vs EP group, 15.8 ± 0.98 mm; P = 0.82). These follicles ovulated in 81.3 ± 3.1 h in E group and 71.0 ± 6.1 h in EP group (P = 0.13). In conclusion, injectable progesterone reduced the proportion of cows that ovulate the dominant follicle present in the ovary at the beginning of estradiol-progesterone-based protocols. However, no difference was detected on time of ovulation after progesterone device removal between groups. |
id |
EMBR_01a5c90eb2f1c90f545f3d5bf74c627a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1095966 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.Folículo dominanteDominant follicleGado de CorteRebanhoOvulaçãoBeef cattleLivestockThe effect of injectable progesterone was evaluated along with estradiol benzoate (EB) on the fate of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary at the beginning of low progesterone-based TAI protocol. All cattle were given 500 µg cloprostenol im (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice, 11 d apart, and allocated into two groups: Estradiol group (E group, n = 11) and Estradiol-Progesterone group (EP group, n = 11). Ten days after the second PGF (Day 0), all cattle were given an intravaginal progesterone device with half progesterone concentration (Cue-Mate with a single pod containing 0.78 g progesterone). Concurrently, all cattle were given 1.5 mg im of estradiol benzoate in 3 mL of canola oil and PGF im on Day 0 of the protocol in a crossover design, in which each cow received both treatments. Cows in the EP group also received 100 mg im progesterone (Sigma) in 2 mL of canola oil. On Day 8, progesterone devices were removed and all cattle were given PGF im. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.0. The DF present on Day 0 ovulated in 76% (16/21) of cows from E group and 28.6% (6/21) of cows from EP group (P = 0.002). After progesterone device removal, the size of ovulatory follicle did not differ between groups (E group, 15.5 ± 0.43 mm vs EP group, 15.8 ± 0.98 mm; P = 0.82). These follicles ovulated in 81.3 ± 3.1 h in E group and 71.0 ± 6.1 h in EP group (P = 0.13). In conclusion, injectable progesterone reduced the proportion of cows that ovulate the dominant follicle present in the ovary at the beginning of estradiol-progesterone-based protocols. However, no difference was detected on time of ovulation after progesterone device removal between groups.LUIZ FRANCISCO MACHADO PFEIFER, CPAF-RO; Reuben John Mapletoft, University of Saskatchewan; Dinesh Dardawal, University of Saskatchewan; Jaswant Singh, University of Saskatchewan.PFEIFER, L. F. M.MAPLETOFT, R. J.DARDAWAL, D.SINGH, J.2018-09-19T00:38:09Z2018-09-19T00:38:09Z2018-09-1820182018-09-19T00:38:09Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBrazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 25, n. 2, p. 1-8, 2018.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/109596610.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.136924enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2018-09-19T00:38:16Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1095966Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542018-09-19T00:38:16falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542018-09-19T00:38:16Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device. |
title |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device. |
spellingShingle |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device. PFEIFER, L. F. M. Folículo dominante Dominant follicle Gado de Corte Rebanho Ovulação Beef cattle Livestock |
title_short |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device. |
title_full |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device. |
title_fullStr |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device. |
title_sort |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device. |
author |
PFEIFER, L. F. M. |
author_facet |
PFEIFER, L. F. M. MAPLETOFT, R. J. DARDAWAL, D. SINGH, J. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
MAPLETOFT, R. J. DARDAWAL, D. SINGH, J. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
LUIZ FRANCISCO MACHADO PFEIFER, CPAF-RO; Reuben John Mapletoft, University of Saskatchewan; Dinesh Dardawal, University of Saskatchewan; Jaswant Singh, University of Saskatchewan. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
PFEIFER, L. F. M. MAPLETOFT, R. J. DARDAWAL, D. SINGH, J. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Folículo dominante Dominant follicle Gado de Corte Rebanho Ovulação Beef cattle Livestock |
topic |
Folículo dominante Dominant follicle Gado de Corte Rebanho Ovulação Beef cattle Livestock |
description |
The effect of injectable progesterone was evaluated along with estradiol benzoate (EB) on the fate of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary at the beginning of low progesterone-based TAI protocol. All cattle were given 500 µg cloprostenol im (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice, 11 d apart, and allocated into two groups: Estradiol group (E group, n = 11) and Estradiol-Progesterone group (EP group, n = 11). Ten days after the second PGF (Day 0), all cattle were given an intravaginal progesterone device with half progesterone concentration (Cue-Mate with a single pod containing 0.78 g progesterone). Concurrently, all cattle were given 1.5 mg im of estradiol benzoate in 3 mL of canola oil and PGF im on Day 0 of the protocol in a crossover design, in which each cow received both treatments. Cows in the EP group also received 100 mg im progesterone (Sigma) in 2 mL of canola oil. On Day 8, progesterone devices were removed and all cattle were given PGF im. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.0. The DF present on Day 0 ovulated in 76% (16/21) of cows from E group and 28.6% (6/21) of cows from EP group (P = 0.002). After progesterone device removal, the size of ovulatory follicle did not differ between groups (E group, 15.5 ± 0.43 mm vs EP group, 15.8 ± 0.98 mm; P = 0.82). These follicles ovulated in 81.3 ± 3.1 h in E group and 71.0 ± 6.1 h in EP group (P = 0.13). In conclusion, injectable progesterone reduced the proportion of cows that ovulate the dominant follicle present in the ovary at the beginning of estradiol-progesterone-based protocols. However, no difference was detected on time of ovulation after progesterone device removal between groups. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-19T00:38:09Z 2018-09-19T00:38:09Z 2018-09-18 2018 2018-09-19T00:38:09Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 25, n. 2, p. 1-8, 2018. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1095966 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.136924 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 25, n. 2, p. 1-8, 2018. 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.136924 |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1095966 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503462608699392 |