How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128591 https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190045 |
Resumo: | The objective with this study was to evaluate the impact of different swine nutritional strategies and technologies, as well as the land spread system, on logistical costs of pig manure distribution. For this, pigs were fed a conventional diet (C0) or a diet supplemented with 0.01% phytase (C1); organic minerals (40% substitution; C2); synthetic amino acids at reduced dietary crude protein levels (C3); or a combination of the three strategies (C4). All pig manure was weighed, then its chemical composition was determined. The mineral values and volume of manure produced were extrapolated to corresponding pig farm sizes in Sao Paulo state (300, 650, and 1000 sows) from real pig manure levels to produce simulations. To determine the logistical cost of manure distribution, two distribution systems were considered: vacuum tank tractor and vacuum tank truck (4.30 and 15 m³, respectively). The land spread truck system had the highest cost/hour worked due to the higher fuel consumption. However, this cost might be different over greater distances. Manure production, as well as the nutrient levels of N, P, and K, were lower for swine fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies. Therefore, the different nutritional technologies reduced the transportation and distribution cost of pig manure by reducing the area and, consequently, the distances that need to be traveled for distribution. However, from an agronomic point of view (i.e., to meet a crop fertilization demand per hectare), manure from pigs fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies had a higher application rate on land. |
id |
EMBR_07129b02498e10a7ae67dbbd0b6ce4c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1128591 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?EnzymeOrganic mineralWasteSwineThe objective with this study was to evaluate the impact of different swine nutritional strategies and technologies, as well as the land spread system, on logistical costs of pig manure distribution. For this, pigs were fed a conventional diet (C0) or a diet supplemented with 0.01% phytase (C1); organic minerals (40% substitution; C2); synthetic amino acids at reduced dietary crude protein levels (C3); or a combination of the three strategies (C4). All pig manure was weighed, then its chemical composition was determined. The mineral values and volume of manure produced were extrapolated to corresponding pig farm sizes in Sao Paulo state (300, 650, and 1000 sows) from real pig manure levels to produce simulations. To determine the logistical cost of manure distribution, two distribution systems were considered: vacuum tank tractor and vacuum tank truck (4.30 and 15 m³, respectively). The land spread truck system had the highest cost/hour worked due to the higher fuel consumption. However, this cost might be different over greater distances. Manure production, as well as the nutrient levels of N, P, and K, were lower for swine fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies. Therefore, the different nutritional technologies reduced the transportation and distribution cost of pig manure by reducing the area and, consequently, the distances that need to be traveled for distribution. However, from an agronomic point of view (i.e., to meet a crop fertilization demand per hectare), manure from pigs fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies had a higher application rate on land.Esther Ramalho Afonso, USP; Rafael Araujo Nacimento, USP; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; Augusto Hauber Gameiro, USP.AFONSO, E. R.NASCIMENTO, R. A.PALHARES, J. C. P.GAMEIRO, A. H.2020-12-23T09:01:54Z2020-12-23T09:01:54Z2020-12-222020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 49, e20190045, p. 1-13, 2020.1806-9290http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128591https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190045enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2020-12-23T09:02:00Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1128591Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542020-12-23T09:02Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution? |
title |
How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution? |
spellingShingle |
How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution? AFONSO, E. R. Enzyme Organic mineral Waste Swine |
title_short |
How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution? |
title_full |
How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution? |
title_fullStr |
How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution? |
title_sort |
How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution? |
author |
AFONSO, E. R. |
author_facet |
AFONSO, E. R. NASCIMENTO, R. A. PALHARES, J. C. P. GAMEIRO, A. H. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
NASCIMENTO, R. A. PALHARES, J. C. P. GAMEIRO, A. H. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Esther Ramalho Afonso, USP; Rafael Araujo Nacimento, USP; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; Augusto Hauber Gameiro, USP. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
AFONSO, E. R. NASCIMENTO, R. A. PALHARES, J. C. P. GAMEIRO, A. H. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Enzyme Organic mineral Waste Swine |
topic |
Enzyme Organic mineral Waste Swine |
description |
The objective with this study was to evaluate the impact of different swine nutritional strategies and technologies, as well as the land spread system, on logistical costs of pig manure distribution. For this, pigs were fed a conventional diet (C0) or a diet supplemented with 0.01% phytase (C1); organic minerals (40% substitution; C2); synthetic amino acids at reduced dietary crude protein levels (C3); or a combination of the three strategies (C4). All pig manure was weighed, then its chemical composition was determined. The mineral values and volume of manure produced were extrapolated to corresponding pig farm sizes in Sao Paulo state (300, 650, and 1000 sows) from real pig manure levels to produce simulations. To determine the logistical cost of manure distribution, two distribution systems were considered: vacuum tank tractor and vacuum tank truck (4.30 and 15 m³, respectively). The land spread truck system had the highest cost/hour worked due to the higher fuel consumption. However, this cost might be different over greater distances. Manure production, as well as the nutrient levels of N, P, and K, were lower for swine fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies. Therefore, the different nutritional technologies reduced the transportation and distribution cost of pig manure by reducing the area and, consequently, the distances that need to be traveled for distribution. However, from an agronomic point of view (i.e., to meet a crop fertilization demand per hectare), manure from pigs fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies had a higher application rate on land. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-23T09:01:54Z 2020-12-23T09:01:54Z 2020-12-22 2020 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 49, e20190045, p. 1-13, 2020. 1806-9290 http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128591 https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190045 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 49, e20190045, p. 1-13, 2020. 1806-9290 |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128591 https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190045 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1817695603401949184 |