How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: AFONSO, E. R.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: NASCIMENTO, R. A., PALHARES, J. C. P., GAMEIRO, A. H.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128591
https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190045
Resumo: The objective with this study was to evaluate the impact of different swine nutritional strategies and technologies, as well as the land spread system, on logistical costs of pig manure distribution. For this, pigs were fed a conventional diet (C0) or a diet supplemented with 0.01% phytase (C1); organic minerals (40% substitution; C2); synthetic amino acids at reduced dietary crude protein levels (C3); or a combination of the three strategies (C4). All pig manure was weighed, then its chemical composition was determined. The mineral values and volume of manure produced were extrapolated to corresponding pig farm sizes in Sao Paulo state (300, 650, and 1000 sows) from real pig manure levels to produce simulations. To determine the logistical cost of manure distribution, two distribution systems were considered: vacuum tank tractor and vacuum tank truck (4.30 and 15 m³, respectively). The land spread truck system had the highest cost/hour worked due to the higher fuel consumption. However, this cost might be different over greater distances. Manure production, as well as the nutrient levels of N, P, and K, were lower for swine fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies. Therefore, the different nutritional technologies reduced the transportation and distribution cost of pig manure by reducing the area and, consequently, the distances that need to be traveled for distribution. However, from an agronomic point of view (i.e., to meet a crop fertilization demand per hectare), manure from pigs fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies had a higher application rate on land.
id EMBR_07129b02498e10a7ae67dbbd0b6ce4c6
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1128591
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?EnzymeOrganic mineralWasteSwineThe objective with this study was to evaluate the impact of different swine nutritional strategies and technologies, as well as the land spread system, on logistical costs of pig manure distribution. For this, pigs were fed a conventional diet (C0) or a diet supplemented with 0.01% phytase (C1); organic minerals (40% substitution; C2); synthetic amino acids at reduced dietary crude protein levels (C3); or a combination of the three strategies (C4). All pig manure was weighed, then its chemical composition was determined. The mineral values and volume of manure produced were extrapolated to corresponding pig farm sizes in Sao Paulo state (300, 650, and 1000 sows) from real pig manure levels to produce simulations. To determine the logistical cost of manure distribution, two distribution systems were considered: vacuum tank tractor and vacuum tank truck (4.30 and 15 m³, respectively). The land spread truck system had the highest cost/hour worked due to the higher fuel consumption. However, this cost might be different over greater distances. Manure production, as well as the nutrient levels of N, P, and K, were lower for swine fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies. Therefore, the different nutritional technologies reduced the transportation and distribution cost of pig manure by reducing the area and, consequently, the distances that need to be traveled for distribution. However, from an agronomic point of view (i.e., to meet a crop fertilization demand per hectare), manure from pigs fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies had a higher application rate on land.Esther Ramalho Afonso, USP; Rafael Araujo Nacimento, USP; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; Augusto Hauber Gameiro, USP.AFONSO, E. R.NASCIMENTO, R. A.PALHARES, J. C. P.GAMEIRO, A. H.2020-12-23T09:01:54Z2020-12-23T09:01:54Z2020-12-222020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 49, e20190045, p. 1-13, 2020.1806-9290http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128591https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190045enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2020-12-23T09:02:00Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1128591Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542020-12-23T09:02falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542020-12-23T09:02Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
spellingShingle How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
AFONSO, E. R.
Enzyme
Organic mineral
Waste
Swine
title_short How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title_full How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title_fullStr How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title_full_unstemmed How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title_sort How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
author AFONSO, E. R.
author_facet AFONSO, E. R.
NASCIMENTO, R. A.
PALHARES, J. C. P.
GAMEIRO, A. H.
author_role author
author2 NASCIMENTO, R. A.
PALHARES, J. C. P.
GAMEIRO, A. H.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Esther Ramalho Afonso, USP; Rafael Araujo Nacimento, USP; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; Augusto Hauber Gameiro, USP.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv AFONSO, E. R.
NASCIMENTO, R. A.
PALHARES, J. C. P.
GAMEIRO, A. H.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Enzyme
Organic mineral
Waste
Swine
topic Enzyme
Organic mineral
Waste
Swine
description The objective with this study was to evaluate the impact of different swine nutritional strategies and technologies, as well as the land spread system, on logistical costs of pig manure distribution. For this, pigs were fed a conventional diet (C0) or a diet supplemented with 0.01% phytase (C1); organic minerals (40% substitution; C2); synthetic amino acids at reduced dietary crude protein levels (C3); or a combination of the three strategies (C4). All pig manure was weighed, then its chemical composition was determined. The mineral values and volume of manure produced were extrapolated to corresponding pig farm sizes in Sao Paulo state (300, 650, and 1000 sows) from real pig manure levels to produce simulations. To determine the logistical cost of manure distribution, two distribution systems were considered: vacuum tank tractor and vacuum tank truck (4.30 and 15 m³, respectively). The land spread truck system had the highest cost/hour worked due to the higher fuel consumption. However, this cost might be different over greater distances. Manure production, as well as the nutrient levels of N, P, and K, were lower for swine fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies. Therefore, the different nutritional technologies reduced the transportation and distribution cost of pig manure by reducing the area and, consequently, the distances that need to be traveled for distribution. However, from an agronomic point of view (i.e., to meet a crop fertilization demand per hectare), manure from pigs fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies had a higher application rate on land.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-23T09:01:54Z
2020-12-23T09:01:54Z
2020-12-22
2020
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 49, e20190045, p. 1-13, 2020.
1806-9290
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128591
https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190045
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 49, e20190045, p. 1-13, 2020.
1806-9290
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128591
https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190045
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503499848876032