Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: BARRO, J. P.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: SANTANA, F. M., DUFFECK, M. R., MACHADO, F. J., LAU, D., SBALCHEIRO, C. C., SCHIPANSKI, C. A., CHAGAS. D. F., VENANCIO, W. S., DALLAGNOL, L. J., GUTERRES, C. W., KUHNEM, P., FEKSA, H. R., DEL PONTE, E, M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1130038
Resumo: Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused mainly by Fusarium graminearum, is best controlled with demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides during flowering. However, the use of premixes of DMI and quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicides to control FHB has increased in Brazil. Data on FHB severity and wheat yields measured in field experiments conducted in Brazil were gathered from both peer- and non-peer-reviewed sources published from 2000 to 2018. After applying selection criteria, 73 field trials from 35 bibliographic sources were identified, among which 50% of the data were obtained from cooperative network trials conducted after 2011. To be included in the analysis, a DMI+QoI premixes or tebuconazole (TEB) were tested in at least 14 trials and three years. Four premixes met the criteria. Estimates of percent control (and respective 95% confidence interval) by a network model fitted to the log of the treatment means ranged from 44.1% (pyraclostrobin + metconazole applied once; 32.4 to 53.7) to 64.3% (pyraclostrobin + metconazole; 58.4 to 69.3); the latter not differing from TEB (59.9%, 53.6 to 65.3). Yield response was statistically similar for pyraclostrobin + metconazole (532.1 kg/ha, 441 to 623) and trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (494.9 kg/ha, 385 to 551), and both differed statistically from a group composed of TEB (448.2 kg/ha, 342 to 554), trifloxystrobin + TEB (468.2 kg/ha, 385 to 551), azoxystrobin + TEB (462.4 kg/ha, 366 to 558) and pyraclostrobin + metconazole applied once (413.7 kg/ha, 308 to 518). The two categories of FHB index (7% cut off) and yield (3,000 kg/ha cut off), both in the non-treated check, did not explain the heterogeneity in the estimates. Two sequential sprays of TEB or one spray of pyraclostrobin + metconazole as management choices are likely more profitable than DIM+QoI premixes sprayed twice during flowering considering only the fungicide effects on yield. Keywords: chemical control; Fusarium graminearum, meta-analysis; profitability; systematic review
id EMBR_0cd600347ab554b957a699ddd619b72a
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1130038
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.Fusarium GraminearumChemical controlMeta-analysisProfitabilitySystematic reviewFusarium head blight (FHB), caused mainly by Fusarium graminearum, is best controlled with demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides during flowering. However, the use of premixes of DMI and quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicides to control FHB has increased in Brazil. Data on FHB severity and wheat yields measured in field experiments conducted in Brazil were gathered from both peer- and non-peer-reviewed sources published from 2000 to 2018. After applying selection criteria, 73 field trials from 35 bibliographic sources were identified, among which 50% of the data were obtained from cooperative network trials conducted after 2011. To be included in the analysis, a DMI+QoI premixes or tebuconazole (TEB) were tested in at least 14 trials and three years. Four premixes met the criteria. Estimates of percent control (and respective 95% confidence interval) by a network model fitted to the log of the treatment means ranged from 44.1% (pyraclostrobin + metconazole applied once; 32.4 to 53.7) to 64.3% (pyraclostrobin + metconazole; 58.4 to 69.3); the latter not differing from TEB (59.9%, 53.6 to 65.3). Yield response was statistically similar for pyraclostrobin + metconazole (532.1 kg/ha, 441 to 623) and trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (494.9 kg/ha, 385 to 551), and both differed statistically from a group composed of TEB (448.2 kg/ha, 342 to 554), trifloxystrobin + TEB (468.2 kg/ha, 385 to 551), azoxystrobin + TEB (462.4 kg/ha, 366 to 558) and pyraclostrobin + metconazole applied once (413.7 kg/ha, 308 to 518). The two categories of FHB index (7% cut off) and yield (3,000 kg/ha cut off), both in the non-treated check, did not explain the heterogeneity in the estimates. Two sequential sprays of TEB or one spray of pyraclostrobin + metconazole as management choices are likely more profitable than DIM+QoI premixes sprayed twice during flowering considering only the fungicide effects on yield. Keywords: chemical control; Fusarium graminearum, meta-analysis; profitability; systematic reviewJHONATAN PAULO BARRO, Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil; FLAVIO MARTINS SANTANA, CNPT; MAÍRA RODRIGUES DUFFECK, Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil; FRANKLIN JACKSON MACHADO, Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil; DOUGLAS LAU, CNPT; CHEILA CRISTINA SBALCHEIRO, CNPT; CARLOS ANDRÉ SCHIPANSKI, G12 Agro Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica, 85015-450, Guarapuava, PR, Braz; DÉBORA FONSECA CHAGAS, G12 Agro Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica, 85015-450, Guarapuava, PR, Braz; WILSON STORY VENANCIO, Estação Experimental Agrícola Campos Gerais (EEACG), 84130-000, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil; LEANDRO JOSE DALLAGNOL, Departamento de Fitossanidade, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 96010-970, Pelotas, RS, Brazil; CAROLINE WESP GUTERRES, CCGL Tecnologia, 98005-970, Cruz Alta, RS, Brazil; PAULO KUHNEM, Biotrigo Genética Ltda., 99052-160, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil; HERALDO ROSA FEKSA, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil5Departamento de Fitossanidade, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 96010-970, Pelotas, RS, Brazil6CCGL Tecnologia, 98005-970, Cruz Alta, RS, Brazil7Biotrigo Genética Ltda., 99052-160, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil8; EMERSON MEDEIROS DEL PONTE, Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.BARRO, J. P.SANTANA, F. M.DUFFECK, M. R.MACHADO, F. J.LAU, D.SBALCHEIRO, C. C.SCHIPANSKI, C. A.CHAGAS. D. F.VENANCIO, W. S.DALLAGNOL, L. J.GUTERRES, C. W.KUHNEM, P.FEKSA, H. R.DEL PONTE, E, M.2021-02-17T18:20:07Z2021-02-17T18:20:07Z2021-02-172020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlePlant Disease, v. 1, p. PDIS-09-20-2096-RE, Sept. 2020.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/113003810.1094/PDIS-09-20-2096-REenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2021-02-17T18:20:18Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1130038Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542021-02-17T18:20:18falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542021-02-17T18:20:18Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.
title Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.
spellingShingle Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.
BARRO, J. P.
Fusarium Graminearum
Chemical control
Meta-analysis
Profitability
Systematic review
title_short Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.
title_full Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.
title_sort Are DMI+QoI Fungicide Premixes During flowering Worthwhile for Fusarium head blight Control in Wheat? A Meta-analysis.
author BARRO, J. P.
author_facet BARRO, J. P.
SANTANA, F. M.
DUFFECK, M. R.
MACHADO, F. J.
LAU, D.
SBALCHEIRO, C. C.
SCHIPANSKI, C. A.
CHAGAS. D. F.
VENANCIO, W. S.
DALLAGNOL, L. J.
GUTERRES, C. W.
KUHNEM, P.
FEKSA, H. R.
DEL PONTE, E, M.
author_role author
author2 SANTANA, F. M.
DUFFECK, M. R.
MACHADO, F. J.
LAU, D.
SBALCHEIRO, C. C.
SCHIPANSKI, C. A.
CHAGAS. D. F.
VENANCIO, W. S.
DALLAGNOL, L. J.
GUTERRES, C. W.
KUHNEM, P.
FEKSA, H. R.
DEL PONTE, E, M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv JHONATAN PAULO BARRO, Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil; FLAVIO MARTINS SANTANA, CNPT; MAÍRA RODRIGUES DUFFECK, Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil; FRANKLIN JACKSON MACHADO, Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil; DOUGLAS LAU, CNPT; CHEILA CRISTINA SBALCHEIRO, CNPT; CARLOS ANDRÉ SCHIPANSKI, G12 Agro Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica, 85015-450, Guarapuava, PR, Braz; DÉBORA FONSECA CHAGAS, G12 Agro Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica, 85015-450, Guarapuava, PR, Braz; WILSON STORY VENANCIO, Estação Experimental Agrícola Campos Gerais (EEACG), 84130-000, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil; LEANDRO JOSE DALLAGNOL, Departamento de Fitossanidade, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 96010-970, Pelotas, RS, Brazil; CAROLINE WESP GUTERRES, CCGL Tecnologia, 98005-970, Cruz Alta, RS, Brazil; PAULO KUHNEM, Biotrigo Genética Ltda., 99052-160, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil; HERALDO ROSA FEKSA, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil5Departamento de Fitossanidade, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 96010-970, Pelotas, RS, Brazil6CCGL Tecnologia, 98005-970, Cruz Alta, RS, Brazil7Biotrigo Genética Ltda., 99052-160, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil8; EMERSON MEDEIROS DEL PONTE, Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv BARRO, J. P.
SANTANA, F. M.
DUFFECK, M. R.
MACHADO, F. J.
LAU, D.
SBALCHEIRO, C. C.
SCHIPANSKI, C. A.
CHAGAS. D. F.
VENANCIO, W. S.
DALLAGNOL, L. J.
GUTERRES, C. W.
KUHNEM, P.
FEKSA, H. R.
DEL PONTE, E, M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fusarium Graminearum
Chemical control
Meta-analysis
Profitability
Systematic review
topic Fusarium Graminearum
Chemical control
Meta-analysis
Profitability
Systematic review
description Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused mainly by Fusarium graminearum, is best controlled with demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides during flowering. However, the use of premixes of DMI and quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicides to control FHB has increased in Brazil. Data on FHB severity and wheat yields measured in field experiments conducted in Brazil were gathered from both peer- and non-peer-reviewed sources published from 2000 to 2018. After applying selection criteria, 73 field trials from 35 bibliographic sources were identified, among which 50% of the data were obtained from cooperative network trials conducted after 2011. To be included in the analysis, a DMI+QoI premixes or tebuconazole (TEB) were tested in at least 14 trials and three years. Four premixes met the criteria. Estimates of percent control (and respective 95% confidence interval) by a network model fitted to the log of the treatment means ranged from 44.1% (pyraclostrobin + metconazole applied once; 32.4 to 53.7) to 64.3% (pyraclostrobin + metconazole; 58.4 to 69.3); the latter not differing from TEB (59.9%, 53.6 to 65.3). Yield response was statistically similar for pyraclostrobin + metconazole (532.1 kg/ha, 441 to 623) and trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (494.9 kg/ha, 385 to 551), and both differed statistically from a group composed of TEB (448.2 kg/ha, 342 to 554), trifloxystrobin + TEB (468.2 kg/ha, 385 to 551), azoxystrobin + TEB (462.4 kg/ha, 366 to 558) and pyraclostrobin + metconazole applied once (413.7 kg/ha, 308 to 518). The two categories of FHB index (7% cut off) and yield (3,000 kg/ha cut off), both in the non-treated check, did not explain the heterogeneity in the estimates. Two sequential sprays of TEB or one spray of pyraclostrobin + metconazole as management choices are likely more profitable than DIM+QoI premixes sprayed twice during flowering considering only the fungicide effects on yield. Keywords: chemical control; Fusarium graminearum, meta-analysis; profitability; systematic review
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2021-02-17T18:20:07Z
2021-02-17T18:20:07Z
2021-02-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Plant Disease, v. 1, p. PDIS-09-20-2096-RE, Sept. 2020.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1130038
10.1094/PDIS-09-20-2096-RE
identifier_str_mv Plant Disease, v. 1, p. PDIS-09-20-2096-RE, Sept. 2020.
10.1094/PDIS-09-20-2096-RE
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1130038
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503502764965888