Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SILVA, G. A. da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: BERNARDI, T. L., SCHAKER, P. D. C., AGUSTINI, B. C., MELLO, L. M. R. de, VALENTE, P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1059337
Resumo: The indiscriminate use of pesticides on grape crops is harmful for consumers´ healthin “in natura” consumption and in the ingestion of wine and grape juice. During winemaking, a rapid and efficient fermentation stage is critical to avoid proliferation of contaminating microorganisms and to guarantee the product´s quality. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has the advantage of detecting these contaminants in the early stages of fermentation. However,this enzymatic reaction may also be susceptible to specific problems, reducing its efficiency. Agricultural practices, such as fungicide treatments, may be a source of PCR inhibiting factors and may also interfere in the normal course of fermentation.The action of the pesticides captan and folpet on PCR and on yeast metabolism was evaluated, once these phthalimide compounds are widely employed in Brazilian vineyards. DNA amplification was only observed at 75 and 37.5 µg/mL of captan concentrations, whereas with folpet, amplification was observed only in the two lowest concentrations tested (42.2 and 21.1µg/mL).Besides the strong inhibition on Taq polymerase activity, phthalimides also inhibited yeast metabolism at all concentrations analyzed.Grape must containing captan and folpet residues could not be transformed into wine due to stuck fermentation caused by the inhibition of yeast metabolism. Noncompliance with the waiting period for phthalimide fungicides may result in financial liabilities to the viticulture sector.The use of yeasts with high fungicide sensitivity should be selected for must fermentation as a strategy for sustainable wine production and to assure that products comply with health and food safety standards. Key words: fungicide;PCR inhibitors; stuck fermentation;Taq polymerase inhibitors; yeast growth
id EMBR_2ba92e3c9fc530b6acbe31b1dfea2069
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1059337
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.FungicidePCR inhibitorsStuck fermentationTaq polymerase inhibitorsThe indiscriminate use of pesticides on grape crops is harmful for consumers´ healthin “in natura” consumption and in the ingestion of wine and grape juice. During winemaking, a rapid and efficient fermentation stage is critical to avoid proliferation of contaminating microorganisms and to guarantee the product´s quality. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has the advantage of detecting these contaminants in the early stages of fermentation. However,this enzymatic reaction may also be susceptible to specific problems, reducing its efficiency. Agricultural practices, such as fungicide treatments, may be a source of PCR inhibiting factors and may also interfere in the normal course of fermentation.The action of the pesticides captan and folpet on PCR and on yeast metabolism was evaluated, once these phthalimide compounds are widely employed in Brazilian vineyards. DNA amplification was only observed at 75 and 37.5 µg/mL of captan concentrations, whereas with folpet, amplification was observed only in the two lowest concentrations tested (42.2 and 21.1µg/mL).Besides the strong inhibition on Taq polymerase activity, phthalimides also inhibited yeast metabolism at all concentrations analyzed.Grape must containing captan and folpet residues could not be transformed into wine due to stuck fermentation caused by the inhibition of yeast metabolism. Noncompliance with the waiting period for phthalimide fungicides may result in financial liabilities to the viticulture sector.The use of yeasts with high fungicide sensitivity should be selected for must fermentation as a strategy for sustainable wine production and to assure that products comply with health and food safety standards. Key words: fungicide;PCR inhibitors; stuck fermentation;Taq polymerase inhibitors; yeast growthGILDO ALMEIDA DA SILVA, CNPUVTaís Letícia Bernardi, ²Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Sertão, Rio Grande do Sul, BrasilPatrícia Dayane Carvalho Schaker, mbrapa Uva e Vinho - Laboratório de Microbiologia, Bento Gonçalves, BrazilBRUNA CARLA AGUSTINI, CNPUVLOIVA MARIA RIBEIRO DE MELLO, CNPUVPatrícia Valente, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.SILVA, G. A. daBERNARDI, T. L.SCHAKER, P. D. C.AGUSTINI, B. C.MELLO, L. M. R. deVALENTE, P.2016-12-27T11:11:11Z2016-12-27T11:11:11Z2016-12-2720162019-05-06T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBrazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, v. 59, e16160241, Jan./Dec. 2016.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1059337enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T03:59:52Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1059337Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T03:59:52falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T03:59:52Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.
title Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.
spellingShingle Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.
SILVA, G. A. da
Fungicide
PCR inhibitors
Stuck fermentation
Taq polymerase inhibitors
title_short Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.
title_full Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.
title_fullStr Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.
title_sort Impact of fungicide residues on polymerase chain reaction and on yeast metabolism.
author SILVA, G. A. da
author_facet SILVA, G. A. da
BERNARDI, T. L.
SCHAKER, P. D. C.
AGUSTINI, B. C.
MELLO, L. M. R. de
VALENTE, P.
author_role author
author2 BERNARDI, T. L.
SCHAKER, P. D. C.
AGUSTINI, B. C.
MELLO, L. M. R. de
VALENTE, P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv GILDO ALMEIDA DA SILVA, CNPUV
Taís Letícia Bernardi, ²Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Sertão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
Patrícia Dayane Carvalho Schaker, mbrapa Uva e Vinho - Laboratório de Microbiologia, Bento Gonçalves, Brazil
BRUNA CARLA AGUSTINI, CNPUV
LOIVA MARIA RIBEIRO DE MELLO, CNPUV
Patrícia Valente, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SILVA, G. A. da
BERNARDI, T. L.
SCHAKER, P. D. C.
AGUSTINI, B. C.
MELLO, L. M. R. de
VALENTE, P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fungicide
PCR inhibitors
Stuck fermentation
Taq polymerase inhibitors
topic Fungicide
PCR inhibitors
Stuck fermentation
Taq polymerase inhibitors
description The indiscriminate use of pesticides on grape crops is harmful for consumers´ healthin “in natura” consumption and in the ingestion of wine and grape juice. During winemaking, a rapid and efficient fermentation stage is critical to avoid proliferation of contaminating microorganisms and to guarantee the product´s quality. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has the advantage of detecting these contaminants in the early stages of fermentation. However,this enzymatic reaction may also be susceptible to specific problems, reducing its efficiency. Agricultural practices, such as fungicide treatments, may be a source of PCR inhibiting factors and may also interfere in the normal course of fermentation.The action of the pesticides captan and folpet on PCR and on yeast metabolism was evaluated, once these phthalimide compounds are widely employed in Brazilian vineyards. DNA amplification was only observed at 75 and 37.5 µg/mL of captan concentrations, whereas with folpet, amplification was observed only in the two lowest concentrations tested (42.2 and 21.1µg/mL).Besides the strong inhibition on Taq polymerase activity, phthalimides also inhibited yeast metabolism at all concentrations analyzed.Grape must containing captan and folpet residues could not be transformed into wine due to stuck fermentation caused by the inhibition of yeast metabolism. Noncompliance with the waiting period for phthalimide fungicides may result in financial liabilities to the viticulture sector.The use of yeasts with high fungicide sensitivity should be selected for must fermentation as a strategy for sustainable wine production and to assure that products comply with health and food safety standards. Key words: fungicide;PCR inhibitors; stuck fermentation;Taq polymerase inhibitors; yeast growth
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-27T11:11:11Z
2016-12-27T11:11:11Z
2016-12-27
2016
2019-05-06T11:11:11Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, v. 59, e16160241, Jan./Dec. 2016.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1059337
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, v. 59, e16160241, Jan./Dec. 2016.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1059337
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503430168903680