Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159888 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01149-z |
Resumo: | Background: Common bean has high production cost, mainly due to the use of inputs like nitrogen fertilizers. An alternative to replace the use of nitrogen fertilizers is the co-inoculation technique. This work aimed to evaluate the economic performance of the co-inoculation of Rhizobium tropici and different doses of Azospirillum brasilense applied at the V2–V3 stage of the common bean. Methods:The economic analysis was carried out based on data from five field experiments in five locations in the state of Goiás in Brazil. Treatments consisted of absolute control (AC), N-fertilizer treatment (NfT), single inoculation of R. tropici (Rt), R. tropici + one dose of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab1l), R. tropici + two doses of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab2l), R. tropici + three doses of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab3l) and R. tropici + four doses of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab4l). The economic analysis was carried out based on prices and market indexes, depending on the grain yield of the different treatments. Results: The best economic performance was obtained by the co-inoculation Rt + Ab3l, which provided the highest average values of gross revenue (2.471 US$ ha−1), net revenue (2.220 US$ ha−1), and benefit–cost ratio (1.4 US$ US$−1). Conclusions: Co-inoculation Rt + Ab3l also showed the lowest production costs (451 US$ ha−1), while the nitrogen treatment with 80 kg ha−1 of N resulted in the highest average production cost (499 US$ ha−1). |
id |
EMBR_3350f240e55e836f6b5ea03aafcb15ac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1159888 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans.FeijãoPhaseolus VulgarisCusto de ProduçãoRhizobium tropiciAzospirillum brasilenseBeansProduction costsBackground: Common bean has high production cost, mainly due to the use of inputs like nitrogen fertilizers. An alternative to replace the use of nitrogen fertilizers is the co-inoculation technique. This work aimed to evaluate the economic performance of the co-inoculation of Rhizobium tropici and different doses of Azospirillum brasilense applied at the V2–V3 stage of the common bean. Methods:The economic analysis was carried out based on data from five field experiments in five locations in the state of Goiás in Brazil. Treatments consisted of absolute control (AC), N-fertilizer treatment (NfT), single inoculation of R. tropici (Rt), R. tropici + one dose of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab1l), R. tropici + two doses of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab2l), R. tropici + three doses of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab3l) and R. tropici + four doses of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab4l). The economic analysis was carried out based on prices and market indexes, depending on the grain yield of the different treatments. Results: The best economic performance was obtained by the co-inoculation Rt + Ab3l, which provided the highest average values of gross revenue (2.471 US$ ha−1), net revenue (2.220 US$ ha−1), and benefit–cost ratio (1.4 US$ US$−1). Conclusions: Co-inoculation Rt + Ab3l also showed the lowest production costs (451 US$ ha−1), while the nitrogen treatment with 80 kg ha−1 of N resulted in the highest average production cost (499 US$ ha−1).MATHEUS MESSIAS, UFG; PRINCEWILL CHUKWUMA ASOBIA, UFG; ENDERSON PETRONIO DE BRITO FERREIRA, CNPAF.MESSIAS, M.ASOBIA, P. C.FERREIRA, E. P. de B.2023-12-18T17:32:31Z2023-12-18T17:32:31Z2023-12-182023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBulletin of the National Research Centre, v. 47, 173, Nov. 2023.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159888https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01149-zenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2023-12-18T17:32:31Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1159888Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542023-12-18T17:32:31falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542023-12-18T17:32:31Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans. |
title |
Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans. |
spellingShingle |
Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans. MESSIAS, M. Feijão Phaseolus Vulgaris Custo de Produção Rhizobium tropici Azospirillum brasilense Beans Production costs |
title_short |
Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans. |
title_full |
Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans. |
title_fullStr |
Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans. |
title_sort |
Economic analysis of rhizobia and azospirilla co-inoculation in common beans. |
author |
MESSIAS, M. |
author_facet |
MESSIAS, M. ASOBIA, P. C. FERREIRA, E. P. de B. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
ASOBIA, P. C. FERREIRA, E. P. de B. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
MATHEUS MESSIAS, UFG; PRINCEWILL CHUKWUMA ASOBIA, UFG; ENDERSON PETRONIO DE BRITO FERREIRA, CNPAF. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MESSIAS, M. ASOBIA, P. C. FERREIRA, E. P. de B. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Feijão Phaseolus Vulgaris Custo de Produção Rhizobium tropici Azospirillum brasilense Beans Production costs |
topic |
Feijão Phaseolus Vulgaris Custo de Produção Rhizobium tropici Azospirillum brasilense Beans Production costs |
description |
Background: Common bean has high production cost, mainly due to the use of inputs like nitrogen fertilizers. An alternative to replace the use of nitrogen fertilizers is the co-inoculation technique. This work aimed to evaluate the economic performance of the co-inoculation of Rhizobium tropici and different doses of Azospirillum brasilense applied at the V2–V3 stage of the common bean. Methods:The economic analysis was carried out based on data from five field experiments in five locations in the state of Goiás in Brazil. Treatments consisted of absolute control (AC), N-fertilizer treatment (NfT), single inoculation of R. tropici (Rt), R. tropici + one dose of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab1l), R. tropici + two doses of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab2l), R. tropici + three doses of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab3l) and R. tropici + four doses of A. brasilense (Rt + Ab4l). The economic analysis was carried out based on prices and market indexes, depending on the grain yield of the different treatments. Results: The best economic performance was obtained by the co-inoculation Rt + Ab3l, which provided the highest average values of gross revenue (2.471 US$ ha−1), net revenue (2.220 US$ ha−1), and benefit–cost ratio (1.4 US$ US$−1). Conclusions: Co-inoculation Rt + Ab3l also showed the lowest production costs (451 US$ ha−1), while the nitrogen treatment with 80 kg ha−1 of N resulted in the highest average production cost (499 US$ ha−1). |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-18T17:32:31Z 2023-12-18T17:32:31Z 2023-12-18 2023 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Bulletin of the National Research Centre, v. 47, 173, Nov. 2023. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159888 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01149-z |
identifier_str_mv |
Bulletin of the National Research Centre, v. 47, 173, Nov. 2023. |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1159888 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01149-z |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503553983709184 |