Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MÉO FILHO, P.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: BERNDT, A., MARCONDES, C. R., PEDROSO, A. de F., SAKAMOTO, L. S., BOAS, D. F. V., RODRIGUES, P. H. M., RIVERO, M. J., BUENO, I. C. S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1121538
Resumo: The present study aimed to investigate whether different lines of a composite breed (5/8 Charolais × 3/8 Zebu), formed at different times, and genetically improved, would result in differences in animal performance, enteric methane emissions, and carcass traits. Forty?six Canchim steers (15 months, 280 ± 33 kg liveweight) from three different lines were used: old, new, and their cross. These three breed lines were considered the treatments (arranged in four randomized blocks based on initial liveweight) and were evaluated under grazing and feedlot conditions in relation to the performance and emission of enteric methane. During the grazing period, the new line was found to be superior to the old only in relation to the average daily liveweight gain (0.692 vs. 0.547 kg/day), and with no differences in relation to the cross line (0.692 vs. 0.620). In the feedlot finishing phase, only the average daily liveweight gain was significantly higher in the new line compared to the cross and old line (1.44 vs. 1.32 and 1.23 kg/day). The new and cross lines demonstrated higher dry matter intake when compared to the old line (10.25 and 10.42 vs. 9.11 kg/day), with the crossline Animals 2020, 10, 303 2 of 15 animals demonstrating the best feed conversion. The new line showed higher enteric methane emissions compared to the old line (178 vs. 156 g/day). The line had an effect on the carcass dressing of the animals, with greater fat thickness in carcasses from the new and cross lines than the old line (4.4 and 3.8 vs. 3.2 mm). Canchim cattle selected for improved productive performance characteristics does not guarantee animals with lower methane emissions under grazing conditions; while in feedlots, can lead to increased daily feed consumption, and hence, to higher emissions of methane.
id EMBR_34eab015f2f5b032f93815cf0a8399b2
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1121538
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.Beef cattleGeneticsGreenhouse gasesGrowth performanceNutritionThe present study aimed to investigate whether different lines of a composite breed (5/8 Charolais × 3/8 Zebu), formed at different times, and genetically improved, would result in differences in animal performance, enteric methane emissions, and carcass traits. Forty?six Canchim steers (15 months, 280 ± 33 kg liveweight) from three different lines were used: old, new, and their cross. These three breed lines were considered the treatments (arranged in four randomized blocks based on initial liveweight) and were evaluated under grazing and feedlot conditions in relation to the performance and emission of enteric methane. During the grazing period, the new line was found to be superior to the old only in relation to the average daily liveweight gain (0.692 vs. 0.547 kg/day), and with no differences in relation to the cross line (0.692 vs. 0.620). In the feedlot finishing phase, only the average daily liveweight gain was significantly higher in the new line compared to the cross and old line (1.44 vs. 1.32 and 1.23 kg/day). The new and cross lines demonstrated higher dry matter intake when compared to the old line (10.25 and 10.42 vs. 9.11 kg/day), with the crossline Animals 2020, 10, 303 2 of 15 animals demonstrating the best feed conversion. The new line showed higher enteric methane emissions compared to the old line (178 vs. 156 g/day). The line had an effect on the carcass dressing of the animals, with greater fat thickness in carcasses from the new and cross lines than the old line (4.4 and 3.8 vs. 3.2 mm). Canchim cattle selected for improved productive performance characteristics does not guarantee animals with lower methane emissions under grazing conditions; while in feedlots, can lead to increased daily feed consumption, and hence, to higher emissions of methane.Paulo Méo?Filho, USP; ALEXANDRE BERNDT, CPPSE; CINTIA RIGHETTI MARCONDES, CPPSE; ANDRE DE FARIA PEDROSO, CPPSE; Leandro S. Sakamoto, USP; Daniella Flavia Vilas Boas, UNEMAT; Paulo H. M. Rodrigues, USP; M. Jordana Rivero, Rothamsted Research; Ives C. S. Bueno, USP.MÉO FILHO, P.BERNDT, A.MARCONDES, C. R.PEDROSO, A. de F.SAKAMOTO, L. S.BOAS, D. F. V.RODRIGUES, P. H. M.RIVERO, M. J.BUENO, I. C. S.2020-04-04T00:50:14Z2020-04-04T00:50:14Z2020-04-0320202020-04-20T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article15 p.Animals, v. 10, n. 303, 2020.2076-2615http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/112153810.3390/ani10020303enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2020-04-04T00:50:22Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1121538Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542020-04-04T00:50:22falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542020-04-04T00:50:22Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.
title Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.
spellingShingle Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.
MÉO FILHO, P.
Beef cattle
Genetics
Greenhouse gases
Growth performance
Nutrition
title_short Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.
title_full Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.
title_fullStr Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.
title_full_unstemmed Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.
title_sort Methane emissions, performance and carcass characteristics of different lines of beef steers reared on pasture and finished in feedlot.
author MÉO FILHO, P.
author_facet MÉO FILHO, P.
BERNDT, A.
MARCONDES, C. R.
PEDROSO, A. de F.
SAKAMOTO, L. S.
BOAS, D. F. V.
RODRIGUES, P. H. M.
RIVERO, M. J.
BUENO, I. C. S.
author_role author
author2 BERNDT, A.
MARCONDES, C. R.
PEDROSO, A. de F.
SAKAMOTO, L. S.
BOAS, D. F. V.
RODRIGUES, P. H. M.
RIVERO, M. J.
BUENO, I. C. S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Paulo Méo?Filho, USP; ALEXANDRE BERNDT, CPPSE; CINTIA RIGHETTI MARCONDES, CPPSE; ANDRE DE FARIA PEDROSO, CPPSE; Leandro S. Sakamoto, USP; Daniella Flavia Vilas Boas, UNEMAT; Paulo H. M. Rodrigues, USP; M. Jordana Rivero, Rothamsted Research; Ives C. S. Bueno, USP.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MÉO FILHO, P.
BERNDT, A.
MARCONDES, C. R.
PEDROSO, A. de F.
SAKAMOTO, L. S.
BOAS, D. F. V.
RODRIGUES, P. H. M.
RIVERO, M. J.
BUENO, I. C. S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beef cattle
Genetics
Greenhouse gases
Growth performance
Nutrition
topic Beef cattle
Genetics
Greenhouse gases
Growth performance
Nutrition
description The present study aimed to investigate whether different lines of a composite breed (5/8 Charolais × 3/8 Zebu), formed at different times, and genetically improved, would result in differences in animal performance, enteric methane emissions, and carcass traits. Forty?six Canchim steers (15 months, 280 ± 33 kg liveweight) from three different lines were used: old, new, and their cross. These three breed lines were considered the treatments (arranged in four randomized blocks based on initial liveweight) and were evaluated under grazing and feedlot conditions in relation to the performance and emission of enteric methane. During the grazing period, the new line was found to be superior to the old only in relation to the average daily liveweight gain (0.692 vs. 0.547 kg/day), and with no differences in relation to the cross line (0.692 vs. 0.620). In the feedlot finishing phase, only the average daily liveweight gain was significantly higher in the new line compared to the cross and old line (1.44 vs. 1.32 and 1.23 kg/day). The new and cross lines demonstrated higher dry matter intake when compared to the old line (10.25 and 10.42 vs. 9.11 kg/day), with the crossline Animals 2020, 10, 303 2 of 15 animals demonstrating the best feed conversion. The new line showed higher enteric methane emissions compared to the old line (178 vs. 156 g/day). The line had an effect on the carcass dressing of the animals, with greater fat thickness in carcasses from the new and cross lines than the old line (4.4 and 3.8 vs. 3.2 mm). Canchim cattle selected for improved productive performance characteristics does not guarantee animals with lower methane emissions under grazing conditions; while in feedlots, can lead to increased daily feed consumption, and hence, to higher emissions of methane.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-04T00:50:14Z
2020-04-04T00:50:14Z
2020-04-03
2020
2020-04-20T11:11:11Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Animals, v. 10, n. 303, 2020.
2076-2615
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1121538
10.3390/ani10020303
identifier_str_mv Animals, v. 10, n. 303, 2020.
2076-2615
10.3390/ani10020303
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1121538
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 15 p.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503491581902848