Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1015185 |
Resumo: | The International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169 and the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) led signatory state-members to recognize traditional communities as subjects of rights, and no longer as objects of tutelage. However, their implementation may bring new challenges in states adopting market-based decision-making to rule social life. In pluri-ethnic societies in which power differentials are structurally embedded, traditional communities and companies exploring their resources and knowledge have been, historically, unequal and opposed parties. In processes of benefit sharing, these unequal social actors are wrongfully considered equally free subjects of rights in negotiating contracts in supposedly free markets. Erasing historical and structural differences, and assuming equality in an unequal world will only reproduce the inequality that CBD has aimed to address. |
id |
EMBR_45a95f925b97f25a76ef4b9cb58b5765 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1015185 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.Comunidade tradicionalConhecimento tradicionalAmazoniaThe International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169 and the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) led signatory state-members to recognize traditional communities as subjects of rights, and no longer as objects of tutelage. However, their implementation may bring new challenges in states adopting market-based decision-making to rule social life. In pluri-ethnic societies in which power differentials are structurally embedded, traditional communities and companies exploring their resources and knowledge have been, historically, unequal and opposed parties. In processes of benefit sharing, these unequal social actors are wrongfully considered equally free subjects of rights in negotiating contracts in supposedly free markets. Erasing historical and structural differences, and assuming equality in an unequal world will only reproduce the inequality that CBD has aimed to address.NOEMI M. PORRO, UFPA; Joaquim Shiraishi Neto, UFMA; ROBERTO PORRO, CPATU.PORRO, N. M.SHIRAISHI NETO, J.PORRO, R.2015-05-12T11:11:11Z2015-05-12T11:11:11Z2015-05-1220152016-01-22T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleThe International Indigenous Policy Journal, v. 6, n. 2, 2015.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1015185enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T02:16:50Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1015185Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T02:16:50Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil. |
title |
Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil. |
spellingShingle |
Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil. PORRO, N. M. Comunidade tradicional Conhecimento tradicional Amazonia |
title_short |
Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil. |
title_full |
Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil. |
title_fullStr |
Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil. |
title_sort |
Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil. |
author |
PORRO, N. M. |
author_facet |
PORRO, N. M. SHIRAISHI NETO, J. PORRO, R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
SHIRAISHI NETO, J. PORRO, R. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
NOEMI M. PORRO, UFPA; Joaquim Shiraishi Neto, UFMA; ROBERTO PORRO, CPATU. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
PORRO, N. M. SHIRAISHI NETO, J. PORRO, R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Comunidade tradicional Conhecimento tradicional Amazonia |
topic |
Comunidade tradicional Conhecimento tradicional Amazonia |
description |
The International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169 and the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) led signatory state-members to recognize traditional communities as subjects of rights, and no longer as objects of tutelage. However, their implementation may bring new challenges in states adopting market-based decision-making to rule social life. In pluri-ethnic societies in which power differentials are structurally embedded, traditional communities and companies exploring their resources and knowledge have been, historically, unequal and opposed parties. In processes of benefit sharing, these unequal social actors are wrongfully considered equally free subjects of rights in negotiating contracts in supposedly free markets. Erasing historical and structural differences, and assuming equality in an unequal world will only reproduce the inequality that CBD has aimed to address. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-05-12T11:11:11Z 2015-05-12T11:11:11Z 2015-05-12 2015 2016-01-22T11:11:11Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
The International Indigenous Policy Journal, v. 6, n. 2, 2015. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1015185 |
identifier_str_mv |
The International Indigenous Policy Journal, v. 6, n. 2, 2015. |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1015185 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1822721116542599168 |