Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PORRO, N. M.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: SHIRAISHI NETO, J., PORRO, R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1015185
Resumo: The International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169 and the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) led signatory state-members to recognize traditional communities as subjects of rights, and no longer as objects of tutelage. However, their implementation may bring new challenges in states adopting market-based decision-making to rule social life. In pluri-ethnic societies in which power differentials are structurally embedded, traditional communities and companies exploring their resources and knowledge have been, historically, unequal and opposed parties. In processes of benefit sharing, these unequal social actors are wrongfully considered equally free subjects of rights in negotiating contracts in supposedly free markets. Erasing historical and structural differences, and assuming equality in an unequal world will only reproduce the inequality that CBD has aimed to address.
id EMBR_45a95f925b97f25a76ef4b9cb58b5765
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1015185
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.Comunidade tradicionalConhecimento tradicionalAmazoniaThe International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169 and the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) led signatory state-members to recognize traditional communities as subjects of rights, and no longer as objects of tutelage. However, their implementation may bring new challenges in states adopting market-based decision-making to rule social life. In pluri-ethnic societies in which power differentials are structurally embedded, traditional communities and companies exploring their resources and knowledge have been, historically, unequal and opposed parties. In processes of benefit sharing, these unequal social actors are wrongfully considered equally free subjects of rights in negotiating contracts in supposedly free markets. Erasing historical and structural differences, and assuming equality in an unequal world will only reproduce the inequality that CBD has aimed to address.NOEMI M. PORRO, UFPA; Joaquim Shiraishi Neto, UFMA; ROBERTO PORRO, CPATU.PORRO, N. M.SHIRAISHI NETO, J.PORRO, R.2015-05-12T11:11:11Z2015-05-12T11:11:11Z2015-05-1220152016-01-22T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleThe International Indigenous Policy Journal, v. 6, n. 2, 2015.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1015185enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T02:16:50Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1015185Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T02:16:50Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.
title Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.
spellingShingle Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.
PORRO, N. M.
Comunidade tradicional
Conhecimento tradicional
Amazonia
title_short Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.
title_full Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.
title_fullStr Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.
title_full_unstemmed Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.
title_sort Traditional communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil.
author PORRO, N. M.
author_facet PORRO, N. M.
SHIRAISHI NETO, J.
PORRO, R.
author_role author
author2 SHIRAISHI NETO, J.
PORRO, R.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv NOEMI M. PORRO, UFPA; Joaquim Shiraishi Neto, UFMA; ROBERTO PORRO, CPATU.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PORRO, N. M.
SHIRAISHI NETO, J.
PORRO, R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Comunidade tradicional
Conhecimento tradicional
Amazonia
topic Comunidade tradicional
Conhecimento tradicional
Amazonia
description The International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169 and the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) led signatory state-members to recognize traditional communities as subjects of rights, and no longer as objects of tutelage. However, their implementation may bring new challenges in states adopting market-based decision-making to rule social life. In pluri-ethnic societies in which power differentials are structurally embedded, traditional communities and companies exploring their resources and knowledge have been, historically, unequal and opposed parties. In processes of benefit sharing, these unequal social actors are wrongfully considered equally free subjects of rights in negotiating contracts in supposedly free markets. Erasing historical and structural differences, and assuming equality in an unequal world will only reproduce the inequality that CBD has aimed to address.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-12T11:11:11Z
2015-05-12T11:11:11Z
2015-05-12
2015
2016-01-22T11:11:11Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv The International Indigenous Policy Journal, v. 6, n. 2, 2015.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1015185
identifier_str_mv The International Indigenous Policy Journal, v. 6, n. 2, 2015.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1015185
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1822721116542599168

Registros relacionados