Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SILVA, A. M. M.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: JONES, D. L., CHADWICK, D. R., QI, X., COTTA, S. R., ARAÚJO, V. L. V. P., MATTEOLI, F. P., LACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V., PEREIRA, A. P. A., FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I., CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127350
Resumo: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to provide key ecosystem services, protecting plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we hypothesized that a combination of AMF (Rhizophagus clarus) and PGPR (Bacillus sp.) could enhance 33P uptake in maize plants under soil water stress. A microcosm experiment using mesh exclusion and a radiolabeled phosphorus tracer (33P) was installed using three types of inoculation: i) only AMF, ii) only PGPR, and iii) a consortium of AMF and PGPR, alongside a control treatment without inoculation. For all treatments, a gradient of three water-holding capacities (WHC) was considered i) 30% (severe drought), ii) 50% (moderate drought), and iii) 80% (optimal condition, no water stress). In severe drought conditions, AMF root colonization of dual-inoculated plants was significantly lower compared to individual inoculation of the AMF, whilst 33P uptake by dual-inoculated plants or plants inoculated with bacteria was 2.4-fold greater than the uninoculated treatment. Under moderate drought conditions the use of AMF promoted the highest 33P uptake by plants, increasing it by 2.1-fold, when compared to the uninoculated treatment. Without drought stress, AMF showed the lowest 33P uptake and, overall, plant P acquisition was lower for all inoculation types when compared to the severe and moderate drought treatments. The total shoot P content was modulated by the water-holding capacity and inoculation type, with the lowest values observed under severe drought and the highest values under moderate drought. The highest soil electrical conductivity (EC) values were found under severe drought in AMF-inoculated plants and the lowest EC for no drought in single or dual-inoculated plants. Furthermore, water-holding capacity influenced the total soil bacterial and mycorrhizal abundance over time, with the highest abundances being found under severe and moderate drought. This study demonstrates that the positive influence of microbial inoculation on 33P uptake by plants varied with soil water gradient. Furthermore, under severe stress conditions, AMF invested more in the production of hyphae, vesicles and spore production, indicating a significant carbon drain from the host plant as evidenced by the lack of translation of increased 33P uptake into biomass. Therefore, under severe drought the use of bacteria or dual-inoculation seems to be more effective than individual AMF inoculation in terms of 33P uptake by plants, while under moderate drought, the use of AMF stood out.
id EMBR_4f49ad914d59427557fd31592b6383b6
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1154944
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungiFungos micorrízicos arbuscularesNutrição de fosfatoRastreador de isótoposFalta de águaSimbiose vegetalMicróbios que vivem no soloEstresse hídricoCrescimento vegetalMilhoMicrobiologiaMicrobiologia do SoloWater shortagesMicrobiologyArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to provide key ecosystem services, protecting plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we hypothesized that a combination of AMF (Rhizophagus clarus) and PGPR (Bacillus sp.) could enhance 33P uptake in maize plants under soil water stress. A microcosm experiment using mesh exclusion and a radiolabeled phosphorus tracer (33P) was installed using three types of inoculation: i) only AMF, ii) only PGPR, and iii) a consortium of AMF and PGPR, alongside a control treatment without inoculation. For all treatments, a gradient of three water-holding capacities (WHC) was considered i) 30% (severe drought), ii) 50% (moderate drought), and iii) 80% (optimal condition, no water stress). In severe drought conditions, AMF root colonization of dual-inoculated plants was significantly lower compared to individual inoculation of the AMF, whilst 33P uptake by dual-inoculated plants or plants inoculated with bacteria was 2.4-fold greater than the uninoculated treatment. Under moderate drought conditions the use of AMF promoted the highest 33P uptake by plants, increasing it by 2.1-fold, when compared to the uninoculated treatment. Without drought stress, AMF showed the lowest 33P uptake and, overall, plant P acquisition was lower for all inoculation types when compared to the severe and moderate drought treatments. The total shoot P content was modulated by the water-holding capacity and inoculation type, with the lowest values observed under severe drought and the highest values under moderate drought. The highest soil electrical conductivity (EC) values were found under severe drought in AMF-inoculated plants and the lowest EC for no drought in single or dual-inoculated plants. Furthermore, water-holding capacity influenced the total soil bacterial and mycorrhizal abundance over time, with the highest abundances being found under severe and moderate drought. This study demonstrates that the positive influence of microbial inoculation on 33P uptake by plants varied with soil water gradient. Furthermore, under severe stress conditions, AMF invested more in the production of hyphae, vesicles and spore production, indicating a significant carbon drain from the host plant as evidenced by the lack of translation of increased 33P uptake into biomass. Therefore, under severe drought the use of bacteria or dual-inoculation seems to be more effective than individual AMF inoculation in terms of 33P uptake by plants, while under moderate drought, the use of AMF stood out.ANTONIO M. M. SILVA, ESALQDAVEY L. JONES, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United KingdomDAVE R. CHADWICK, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United KingdomXUE QI, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United KingdomSIMONE R. COTTA, USP/CENAVICTOR L. V. P. ARAÚJO, ESALQFILIPE P. MATTEOLI, Laboratory of Microbial Bioinformatics, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, São Paulo State University, BauruGILENO V. LACERDA JÚNIORARTHUR P. A. PEREIRA, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CEPAULO IVAN FERNANDES JUNIOR, CPATSAELKE J. B. N. CARDOSO, ESALQ.SILVA, A. M. M.JONES, D. L.CHADWICK, D. R.QI, X.COTTA, S. R.ARAÚJO, V. L. V. P.MATTEOLI, F. P.LACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V.PEREIRA, A. P. A.FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I.CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.2023-07-14T12:24:05Z2023-07-14T12:24:05Z2023-07-142023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleMicrobiological Research, v. 271, 127350, 2023.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127350enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2023-07-14T12:24:05Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1154944Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542023-07-14T12:24:05Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
title Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
spellingShingle Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
SILVA, A. M. M.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Fungos micorrízicos arbusculares
Nutrição de fosfato
Rastreador de isótopos
Falta de água
Simbiose vegetal
Micróbios que vivem no solo
Estresse hídrico
Crescimento vegetal
Milho
Microbiologia
Microbiologia do Solo
Water shortages
Microbiology
title_short Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
title_full Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
title_fullStr Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
title_full_unstemmed Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
title_sort Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
author SILVA, A. M. M.
author_facet SILVA, A. M. M.
JONES, D. L.
CHADWICK, D. R.
QI, X.
COTTA, S. R.
ARAÚJO, V. L. V. P.
MATTEOLI, F. P.
LACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V.
PEREIRA, A. P. A.
FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I.
CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.
author_role author
author2 JONES, D. L.
CHADWICK, D. R.
QI, X.
COTTA, S. R.
ARAÚJO, V. L. V. P.
MATTEOLI, F. P.
LACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V.
PEREIRA, A. P. A.
FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I.
CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv ANTONIO M. M. SILVA, ESALQ
DAVEY L. JONES, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United Kingdom
DAVE R. CHADWICK, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
XUE QI, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United Kingdom
SIMONE R. COTTA, USP/CENA
VICTOR L. V. P. ARAÚJO, ESALQ
FILIPE P. MATTEOLI, Laboratory of Microbial Bioinformatics, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, São Paulo State University, Bauru
GILENO V. LACERDA JÚNIOR
ARTHUR P. A. PEREIRA, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE
PAULO IVAN FERNANDES JUNIOR, CPATSA
ELKE J. B. N. CARDOSO, ESALQ.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SILVA, A. M. M.
JONES, D. L.
CHADWICK, D. R.
QI, X.
COTTA, S. R.
ARAÚJO, V. L. V. P.
MATTEOLI, F. P.
LACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V.
PEREIRA, A. P. A.
FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I.
CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Fungos micorrízicos arbusculares
Nutrição de fosfato
Rastreador de isótopos
Falta de água
Simbiose vegetal
Micróbios que vivem no solo
Estresse hídrico
Crescimento vegetal
Milho
Microbiologia
Microbiologia do Solo
Water shortages
Microbiology
topic Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Fungos micorrízicos arbusculares
Nutrição de fosfato
Rastreador de isótopos
Falta de água
Simbiose vegetal
Micróbios que vivem no solo
Estresse hídrico
Crescimento vegetal
Milho
Microbiologia
Microbiologia do Solo
Water shortages
Microbiology
description Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to provide key ecosystem services, protecting plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we hypothesized that a combination of AMF (Rhizophagus clarus) and PGPR (Bacillus sp.) could enhance 33P uptake in maize plants under soil water stress. A microcosm experiment using mesh exclusion and a radiolabeled phosphorus tracer (33P) was installed using three types of inoculation: i) only AMF, ii) only PGPR, and iii) a consortium of AMF and PGPR, alongside a control treatment without inoculation. For all treatments, a gradient of three water-holding capacities (WHC) was considered i) 30% (severe drought), ii) 50% (moderate drought), and iii) 80% (optimal condition, no water stress). In severe drought conditions, AMF root colonization of dual-inoculated plants was significantly lower compared to individual inoculation of the AMF, whilst 33P uptake by dual-inoculated plants or plants inoculated with bacteria was 2.4-fold greater than the uninoculated treatment. Under moderate drought conditions the use of AMF promoted the highest 33P uptake by plants, increasing it by 2.1-fold, when compared to the uninoculated treatment. Without drought stress, AMF showed the lowest 33P uptake and, overall, plant P acquisition was lower for all inoculation types when compared to the severe and moderate drought treatments. The total shoot P content was modulated by the water-holding capacity and inoculation type, with the lowest values observed under severe drought and the highest values under moderate drought. The highest soil electrical conductivity (EC) values were found under severe drought in AMF-inoculated plants and the lowest EC for no drought in single or dual-inoculated plants. Furthermore, water-holding capacity influenced the total soil bacterial and mycorrhizal abundance over time, with the highest abundances being found under severe and moderate drought. This study demonstrates that the positive influence of microbial inoculation on 33P uptake by plants varied with soil water gradient. Furthermore, under severe stress conditions, AMF invested more in the production of hyphae, vesicles and spore production, indicating a significant carbon drain from the host plant as evidenced by the lack of translation of increased 33P uptake into biomass. Therefore, under severe drought the use of bacteria or dual-inoculation seems to be more effective than individual AMF inoculation in terms of 33P uptake by plants, while under moderate drought, the use of AMF stood out.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-14T12:24:05Z
2023-07-14T12:24:05Z
2023-07-14
2023
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Microbiological Research, v. 271, 127350, 2023.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127350
identifier_str_mv Microbiological Research, v. 271, 127350, 2023.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127350
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1822721623271145472