Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127350 |
Resumo: | Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to provide key ecosystem services, protecting plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we hypothesized that a combination of AMF (Rhizophagus clarus) and PGPR (Bacillus sp.) could enhance 33P uptake in maize plants under soil water stress. A microcosm experiment using mesh exclusion and a radiolabeled phosphorus tracer (33P) was installed using three types of inoculation: i) only AMF, ii) only PGPR, and iii) a consortium of AMF and PGPR, alongside a control treatment without inoculation. For all treatments, a gradient of three water-holding capacities (WHC) was considered i) 30% (severe drought), ii) 50% (moderate drought), and iii) 80% (optimal condition, no water stress). In severe drought conditions, AMF root colonization of dual-inoculated plants was significantly lower compared to individual inoculation of the AMF, whilst 33P uptake by dual-inoculated plants or plants inoculated with bacteria was 2.4-fold greater than the uninoculated treatment. Under moderate drought conditions the use of AMF promoted the highest 33P uptake by plants, increasing it by 2.1-fold, when compared to the uninoculated treatment. Without drought stress, AMF showed the lowest 33P uptake and, overall, plant P acquisition was lower for all inoculation types when compared to the severe and moderate drought treatments. The total shoot P content was modulated by the water-holding capacity and inoculation type, with the lowest values observed under severe drought and the highest values under moderate drought. The highest soil electrical conductivity (EC) values were found under severe drought in AMF-inoculated plants and the lowest EC for no drought in single or dual-inoculated plants. Furthermore, water-holding capacity influenced the total soil bacterial and mycorrhizal abundance over time, with the highest abundances being found under severe and moderate drought. This study demonstrates that the positive influence of microbial inoculation on 33P uptake by plants varied with soil water gradient. Furthermore, under severe stress conditions, AMF invested more in the production of hyphae, vesicles and spore production, indicating a significant carbon drain from the host plant as evidenced by the lack of translation of increased 33P uptake into biomass. Therefore, under severe drought the use of bacteria or dual-inoculation seems to be more effective than individual AMF inoculation in terms of 33P uptake by plants, while under moderate drought, the use of AMF stood out. |
id |
EMBR_4f49ad914d59427557fd31592b6383b6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1154944 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress?Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungiFungos micorrízicos arbuscularesNutrição de fosfatoRastreador de isótoposFalta de águaSimbiose vegetalMicróbios que vivem no soloEstresse hídricoCrescimento vegetalMilhoMicrobiologiaMicrobiologia do SoloWater shortagesMicrobiologyArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to provide key ecosystem services, protecting plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we hypothesized that a combination of AMF (Rhizophagus clarus) and PGPR (Bacillus sp.) could enhance 33P uptake in maize plants under soil water stress. A microcosm experiment using mesh exclusion and a radiolabeled phosphorus tracer (33P) was installed using three types of inoculation: i) only AMF, ii) only PGPR, and iii) a consortium of AMF and PGPR, alongside a control treatment without inoculation. For all treatments, a gradient of three water-holding capacities (WHC) was considered i) 30% (severe drought), ii) 50% (moderate drought), and iii) 80% (optimal condition, no water stress). In severe drought conditions, AMF root colonization of dual-inoculated plants was significantly lower compared to individual inoculation of the AMF, whilst 33P uptake by dual-inoculated plants or plants inoculated with bacteria was 2.4-fold greater than the uninoculated treatment. Under moderate drought conditions the use of AMF promoted the highest 33P uptake by plants, increasing it by 2.1-fold, when compared to the uninoculated treatment. Without drought stress, AMF showed the lowest 33P uptake and, overall, plant P acquisition was lower for all inoculation types when compared to the severe and moderate drought treatments. The total shoot P content was modulated by the water-holding capacity and inoculation type, with the lowest values observed under severe drought and the highest values under moderate drought. The highest soil electrical conductivity (EC) values were found under severe drought in AMF-inoculated plants and the lowest EC for no drought in single or dual-inoculated plants. Furthermore, water-holding capacity influenced the total soil bacterial and mycorrhizal abundance over time, with the highest abundances being found under severe and moderate drought. This study demonstrates that the positive influence of microbial inoculation on 33P uptake by plants varied with soil water gradient. Furthermore, under severe stress conditions, AMF invested more in the production of hyphae, vesicles and spore production, indicating a significant carbon drain from the host plant as evidenced by the lack of translation of increased 33P uptake into biomass. Therefore, under severe drought the use of bacteria or dual-inoculation seems to be more effective than individual AMF inoculation in terms of 33P uptake by plants, while under moderate drought, the use of AMF stood out.ANTONIO M. M. SILVA, ESALQDAVEY L. JONES, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United KingdomDAVE R. CHADWICK, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United KingdomXUE QI, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United KingdomSIMONE R. COTTA, USP/CENAVICTOR L. V. P. ARAÚJO, ESALQFILIPE P. MATTEOLI, Laboratory of Microbial Bioinformatics, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, São Paulo State University, BauruGILENO V. LACERDA JÚNIORARTHUR P. A. PEREIRA, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CEPAULO IVAN FERNANDES JUNIOR, CPATSAELKE J. B. N. CARDOSO, ESALQ.SILVA, A. M. M.JONES, D. L.CHADWICK, D. R.QI, X.COTTA, S. R.ARAÚJO, V. L. V. P.MATTEOLI, F. P.LACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V.PEREIRA, A. P. A.FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I.CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.2023-07-14T12:24:05Z2023-07-14T12:24:05Z2023-07-142023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleMicrobiological Research, v. 271, 127350, 2023.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127350enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2023-07-14T12:24:05Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1154944Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542023-07-14T12:24:05Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress? |
title |
Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress? |
spellingShingle |
Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress? SILVA, A. M. M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Fungos micorrízicos arbusculares Nutrição de fosfato Rastreador de isótopos Falta de água Simbiose vegetal Micróbios que vivem no solo Estresse hídrico Crescimento vegetal Milho Microbiologia Microbiologia do Solo Water shortages Microbiology |
title_short |
Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress? |
title_full |
Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress? |
title_fullStr |
Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress? |
title_sort |
Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria facilitate P33 uptake in maize plants under water stress? |
author |
SILVA, A. M. M. |
author_facet |
SILVA, A. M. M. JONES, D. L. CHADWICK, D. R. QI, X. COTTA, S. R. ARAÚJO, V. L. V. P. MATTEOLI, F. P. LACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V. PEREIRA, A. P. A. FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I. CARDOSO, E. J. B. N. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
JONES, D. L. CHADWICK, D. R. QI, X. COTTA, S. R. ARAÚJO, V. L. V. P. MATTEOLI, F. P. LACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V. PEREIRA, A. P. A. FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I. CARDOSO, E. J. B. N. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
ANTONIO M. M. SILVA, ESALQ DAVEY L. JONES, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United Kingdom DAVE R. CHADWICK, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom XUE QI, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, United Kingdom SIMONE R. COTTA, USP/CENA VICTOR L. V. P. ARAÚJO, ESALQ FILIPE P. MATTEOLI, Laboratory of Microbial Bioinformatics, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, São Paulo State University, Bauru GILENO V. LACERDA JÚNIOR ARTHUR P. A. PEREIRA, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE PAULO IVAN FERNANDES JUNIOR, CPATSA ELKE J. B. N. CARDOSO, ESALQ. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, A. M. M. JONES, D. L. CHADWICK, D. R. QI, X. COTTA, S. R. ARAÚJO, V. L. V. P. MATTEOLI, F. P. LACERDA-JÚNIOR, G. V. PEREIRA, A. P. A. FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I. CARDOSO, E. J. B. N. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Fungos micorrízicos arbusculares Nutrição de fosfato Rastreador de isótopos Falta de água Simbiose vegetal Micróbios que vivem no solo Estresse hídrico Crescimento vegetal Milho Microbiologia Microbiologia do Solo Water shortages Microbiology |
topic |
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Fungos micorrízicos arbusculares Nutrição de fosfato Rastreador de isótopos Falta de água Simbiose vegetal Micróbios que vivem no solo Estresse hídrico Crescimento vegetal Milho Microbiologia Microbiologia do Solo Water shortages Microbiology |
description |
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to provide key ecosystem services, protecting plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we hypothesized that a combination of AMF (Rhizophagus clarus) and PGPR (Bacillus sp.) could enhance 33P uptake in maize plants under soil water stress. A microcosm experiment using mesh exclusion and a radiolabeled phosphorus tracer (33P) was installed using three types of inoculation: i) only AMF, ii) only PGPR, and iii) a consortium of AMF and PGPR, alongside a control treatment without inoculation. For all treatments, a gradient of three water-holding capacities (WHC) was considered i) 30% (severe drought), ii) 50% (moderate drought), and iii) 80% (optimal condition, no water stress). In severe drought conditions, AMF root colonization of dual-inoculated plants was significantly lower compared to individual inoculation of the AMF, whilst 33P uptake by dual-inoculated plants or plants inoculated with bacteria was 2.4-fold greater than the uninoculated treatment. Under moderate drought conditions the use of AMF promoted the highest 33P uptake by plants, increasing it by 2.1-fold, when compared to the uninoculated treatment. Without drought stress, AMF showed the lowest 33P uptake and, overall, plant P acquisition was lower for all inoculation types when compared to the severe and moderate drought treatments. The total shoot P content was modulated by the water-holding capacity and inoculation type, with the lowest values observed under severe drought and the highest values under moderate drought. The highest soil electrical conductivity (EC) values were found under severe drought in AMF-inoculated plants and the lowest EC for no drought in single or dual-inoculated plants. Furthermore, water-holding capacity influenced the total soil bacterial and mycorrhizal abundance over time, with the highest abundances being found under severe and moderate drought. This study demonstrates that the positive influence of microbial inoculation on 33P uptake by plants varied with soil water gradient. Furthermore, under severe stress conditions, AMF invested more in the production of hyphae, vesicles and spore production, indicating a significant carbon drain from the host plant as evidenced by the lack of translation of increased 33P uptake into biomass. Therefore, under severe drought the use of bacteria or dual-inoculation seems to be more effective than individual AMF inoculation in terms of 33P uptake by plants, while under moderate drought, the use of AMF stood out. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-14T12:24:05Z 2023-07-14T12:24:05Z 2023-07-14 2023 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Microbiological Research, v. 271, 127350, 2023. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127350 |
identifier_str_mv |
Microbiological Research, v. 271, 127350, 2023. |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1154944 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127350 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1822721623271145472 |