The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SIST, P.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: SABLAYROLLES, P., BARTHELON, S., SOUSA-OTA, L., KIBLER, J.-F., RUSCHEL, A., SANTOS-MELO, M., EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/989173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f5071508
Resumo: Small-scale farmers in the Brazilian Amazon collectively hold tenure over more than 12 million ha of permanent forest reserves, as required by the Forest Code. The trade-off between forest conservation and other land uses entails opportunity costs for them and for the country, which have not been sufficiently studied. We assessed the potential income generated by multiple use forest management for farmers and compared it to the income potentially derived from six other agricultural land uses. Income from the forest was from (i) logging, carried out by a logging company in partnership with farmers? associations; and (ii) harvesting the seeds of Carapa guianensis (local name andiroba) for the production of oil. We then compared the income generated by multiple-use forest management with the income from different types of agrarian systems. According to our calculations in this study, the mean annual economic benefits from multiple forest use are the same as the least productive agrarian system, but only 25% of the annual income generated by the most productive system. Although the income generated by logging may be considered low when calculated on an annual basis and compared to incomes generated by agriculture, the one-time payment after logging is significant (US$5,800 to US$33,508) and could be used to implement more intensive and productive cropping systems such as planting black pepper. The income from forest management could also be used to establish permanent fields in deforested areas for highly productive annual crops using conservation agriculture techniques. These techniques are alternatives to the traditional land use based on periodic clearing of the forest. Nevertheless, the shift in current practices towards adoption of more sustainable conservation agriculture techniques will also require the technical and legal support of the State to help small farmers apply these alternatives, which aim to integrate forest management in sustainable agricultural production systems.
id EMBR_50cc93a998811325bb04b24354199807
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/989173
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.Manejo florestalUso múltiploManejo florestal comunitárioProduto florestal não-madeireiroMultiple-use forest managementNon-timber forest productsSmall farmingAgricultura FamiliarAmazoniacommunity forestrySmall-scale farmers in the Brazilian Amazon collectively hold tenure over more than 12 million ha of permanent forest reserves, as required by the Forest Code. The trade-off between forest conservation and other land uses entails opportunity costs for them and for the country, which have not been sufficiently studied. We assessed the potential income generated by multiple use forest management for farmers and compared it to the income potentially derived from six other agricultural land uses. Income from the forest was from (i) logging, carried out by a logging company in partnership with farmers? associations; and (ii) harvesting the seeds of Carapa guianensis (local name andiroba) for the production of oil. We then compared the income generated by multiple-use forest management with the income from different types of agrarian systems. According to our calculations in this study, the mean annual economic benefits from multiple forest use are the same as the least productive agrarian system, but only 25% of the annual income generated by the most productive system. Although the income generated by logging may be considered low when calculated on an annual basis and compared to incomes generated by agriculture, the one-time payment after logging is significant (US$5,800 to US$33,508) and could be used to implement more intensive and productive cropping systems such as planting black pepper. The income from forest management could also be used to establish permanent fields in deforested areas for highly productive annual crops using conservation agriculture techniques. These techniques are alternatives to the traditional land use based on periodic clearing of the forest. Nevertheless, the shift in current practices towards adoption of more sustainable conservation agriculture techniques will also require the technical and legal support of the State to help small farmers apply these alternatives, which aim to integrate forest management in sustainable agricultural production systems.Plinio Sist, CIRAD; Philippe Sablayrolles, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Sophie Barthelon, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Liz Sousa-Ota, UNESP; Jean-François Kibler, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); ADEMIR ROBERTO RUSCHEL, CPATU; Marcelo Santos-Melo, Serviço Florestal Brasileiro MMA/SFB; Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, CIRAD.SIST, P.SABLAYROLLES, P.BARTHELON, S.SOUSA-OTA, L.KIBLER, J.-F.RUSCHEL, A.SANTOS-MELO, M.EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D.2014-06-27T11:11:11Z2014-06-27T11:11:11Z2014-06-2720142015-04-07T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleForests, v. 5, n. 7, p. 1508-1531, 2014.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/989173http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f5071508enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T00:58:13Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/989173Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T00:58:13falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T00:58:13Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
spellingShingle The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
SIST, P.
Manejo florestal
Uso múltiplo
Manejo florestal comunitário
Produto florestal não-madeireiro
Multiple-use forest management
Non-timber forest products
Small farming
Agricultura Familiar
Amazonia
community forestry
title_short The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title_full The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title_fullStr The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title_sort The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
author SIST, P.
author_facet SIST, P.
SABLAYROLLES, P.
BARTHELON, S.
SOUSA-OTA, L.
KIBLER, J.-F.
RUSCHEL, A.
SANTOS-MELO, M.
EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D.
author_role author
author2 SABLAYROLLES, P.
BARTHELON, S.
SOUSA-OTA, L.
KIBLER, J.-F.
RUSCHEL, A.
SANTOS-MELO, M.
EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Plinio Sist, CIRAD; Philippe Sablayrolles, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Sophie Barthelon, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Liz Sousa-Ota, UNESP; Jean-François Kibler, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); ADEMIR ROBERTO RUSCHEL, CPATU; Marcelo Santos-Melo, Serviço Florestal Brasileiro MMA/SFB; Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, CIRAD.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SIST, P.
SABLAYROLLES, P.
BARTHELON, S.
SOUSA-OTA, L.
KIBLER, J.-F.
RUSCHEL, A.
SANTOS-MELO, M.
EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Manejo florestal
Uso múltiplo
Manejo florestal comunitário
Produto florestal não-madeireiro
Multiple-use forest management
Non-timber forest products
Small farming
Agricultura Familiar
Amazonia
community forestry
topic Manejo florestal
Uso múltiplo
Manejo florestal comunitário
Produto florestal não-madeireiro
Multiple-use forest management
Non-timber forest products
Small farming
Agricultura Familiar
Amazonia
community forestry
description Small-scale farmers in the Brazilian Amazon collectively hold tenure over more than 12 million ha of permanent forest reserves, as required by the Forest Code. The trade-off between forest conservation and other land uses entails opportunity costs for them and for the country, which have not been sufficiently studied. We assessed the potential income generated by multiple use forest management for farmers and compared it to the income potentially derived from six other agricultural land uses. Income from the forest was from (i) logging, carried out by a logging company in partnership with farmers? associations; and (ii) harvesting the seeds of Carapa guianensis (local name andiroba) for the production of oil. We then compared the income generated by multiple-use forest management with the income from different types of agrarian systems. According to our calculations in this study, the mean annual economic benefits from multiple forest use are the same as the least productive agrarian system, but only 25% of the annual income generated by the most productive system. Although the income generated by logging may be considered low when calculated on an annual basis and compared to incomes generated by agriculture, the one-time payment after logging is significant (US$5,800 to US$33,508) and could be used to implement more intensive and productive cropping systems such as planting black pepper. The income from forest management could also be used to establish permanent fields in deforested areas for highly productive annual crops using conservation agriculture techniques. These techniques are alternatives to the traditional land use based on periodic clearing of the forest. Nevertheless, the shift in current practices towards adoption of more sustainable conservation agriculture techniques will also require the technical and legal support of the State to help small farmers apply these alternatives, which aim to integrate forest management in sustainable agricultural production systems.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-27T11:11:11Z
2014-06-27T11:11:11Z
2014-06-27
2014
2015-04-07T11:11:11Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Forests, v. 5, n. 7, p. 1508-1531, 2014.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/989173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f5071508
identifier_str_mv Forests, v. 5, n. 7, p. 1508-1531, 2014.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/989173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f5071508
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503391601229824