Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: NASCIMENTO, A. F. do
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: OLIVEIRA, C. M. de, PEDREIRA, B. C. e, PEREIRA, D. H., RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1129729
https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12287
Resumo: In the Brazilian Amazon, nitrogen input strategies are required to maintain forage-livestock systems productivity. However, greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions mitigation from tropical soils is also a global demand. This research aims to assess productivity and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Oxisol cultivated with Marandu palisade grass (Brachiaria brizantha [Hochst. Ex A.Rich.] Stapf) submitted to nitrogen (N) input strategies (N fertilization and biological N fixation) in the Brazilian Amazon. The treatments were the following: control (unfertilized); U40 (fertilized with 40 kg N/ha as urea); U80 (fertilized with 80 kg N/ha as urea); AS40 (fertilized with 40 kg N/ha as ammonium sulfate); AS80 (fertilized with 80 kg N/ha as ammonium sulfate); and IAB (inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense ). From January to March 2016, soil N2O emission, forage accumulation (FA) and relative emission (RE) were assessed during two 28-day cycles. The FA was greater in the U80 and AS80 than in control and IAB. The highest peaks of soil N2O flux occurred from 4 to 7 days after N fertilization, primarily in the highest N rates treatments. Overall, 40 kg N/ha resulted in higher N2O flux than control and IAB, which were lower than 80 kg N/ha regardless of the N source. The lowest fluxes occurred in the control and IAB (below 20 ug N-N2O m-2 hr-1). All of the emission factors (EF) calculated for both fertilizers and rates were lower than 0.35%, which is below the 1% established by the IPCC. Our results indicate the need for discussion of the EF in the pasture intensification to contribute to avoid deforestation and mitigating emissions. The inputs of 40 kg N/ha per application with urea or ammonium sulfate, due to the low EF and RE, are recommended as a pasture N input strategy in the Brazilian Amazon.
id EMBR_67eb25bd5e93dee74b1eaa7632c7a30c
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1129729
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.MitigaçãoMudança ClimáticaFertilizantePecuáriaClimate changeLivestockFertilizersIn the Brazilian Amazon, nitrogen input strategies are required to maintain forage-livestock systems productivity. However, greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions mitigation from tropical soils is also a global demand. This research aims to assess productivity and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Oxisol cultivated with Marandu palisade grass (Brachiaria brizantha [Hochst. Ex A.Rich.] Stapf) submitted to nitrogen (N) input strategies (N fertilization and biological N fixation) in the Brazilian Amazon. The treatments were the following: control (unfertilized); U40 (fertilized with 40 kg N/ha as urea); U80 (fertilized with 80 kg N/ha as urea); AS40 (fertilized with 40 kg N/ha as ammonium sulfate); AS80 (fertilized with 80 kg N/ha as ammonium sulfate); and IAB (inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense ). From January to March 2016, soil N2O emission, forage accumulation (FA) and relative emission (RE) were assessed during two 28-day cycles. The FA was greater in the U80 and AS80 than in control and IAB. The highest peaks of soil N2O flux occurred from 4 to 7 days after N fertilization, primarily in the highest N rates treatments. Overall, 40 kg N/ha resulted in higher N2O flux than control and IAB, which were lower than 80 kg N/ha regardless of the N source. The lowest fluxes occurred in the control and IAB (below 20 ug N-N2O m-2 hr-1). All of the emission factors (EF) calculated for both fertilizers and rates were lower than 0.35%, which is below the 1% established by the IPCC. Our results indicate the need for discussion of the EF in the pasture intensification to contribute to avoid deforestation and mitigating emissions. The inputs of 40 kg N/ha per application with urea or ammonium sulfate, due to the low EF and RE, are recommended as a pasture N input strategy in the Brazilian Amazon.ALEXANDRE FERREIRA DO NASCIMENTO, CPAMT; CARINE MOREIRA DE OLIVEIRA, UFMT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; DALTON HENRIQUE PEREIRA, UFMT; RENATO DE ARAGAO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, CNPS.NASCIMENTO, A. F. doOLIVEIRA, C. M. dePEDREIRA, B. C. ePEREIRA, D. H.RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.2022-01-29T02:06:21Z2022-01-29T02:06:21Z2021-02-012021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleGrassland Science, v. 67, n. 1, p. 63-72, Jan. 2021http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1129729https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12287enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2022-01-29T02:06:32Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1129729Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542022-01-29T02:06:32falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542022-01-29T02:06:32Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.
title Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.
spellingShingle Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.
NASCIMENTO, A. F. do
Mitigação
Mudança Climática
Fertilizante
Pecuária
Climate change
Livestock
Fertilizers
title_short Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.
title_full Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.
title_fullStr Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.
title_full_unstemmed Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.
title_sort Nitrous oxide emissions and forage accumulation in the Brazilian Amazon forage-livestock systems submitted to N input strategies.
author NASCIMENTO, A. F. do
author_facet NASCIMENTO, A. F. do
OLIVEIRA, C. M. de
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
PEREIRA, D. H.
RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.
author_role author
author2 OLIVEIRA, C. M. de
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
PEREIRA, D. H.
RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv ALEXANDRE FERREIRA DO NASCIMENTO, CPAMT; CARINE MOREIRA DE OLIVEIRA, UFMT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; DALTON HENRIQUE PEREIRA, UFMT; RENATO DE ARAGAO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, CNPS.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv NASCIMENTO, A. F. do
OLIVEIRA, C. M. de
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
PEREIRA, D. H.
RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mitigação
Mudança Climática
Fertilizante
Pecuária
Climate change
Livestock
Fertilizers
topic Mitigação
Mudança Climática
Fertilizante
Pecuária
Climate change
Livestock
Fertilizers
description In the Brazilian Amazon, nitrogen input strategies are required to maintain forage-livestock systems productivity. However, greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions mitigation from tropical soils is also a global demand. This research aims to assess productivity and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Oxisol cultivated with Marandu palisade grass (Brachiaria brizantha [Hochst. Ex A.Rich.] Stapf) submitted to nitrogen (N) input strategies (N fertilization and biological N fixation) in the Brazilian Amazon. The treatments were the following: control (unfertilized); U40 (fertilized with 40 kg N/ha as urea); U80 (fertilized with 80 kg N/ha as urea); AS40 (fertilized with 40 kg N/ha as ammonium sulfate); AS80 (fertilized with 80 kg N/ha as ammonium sulfate); and IAB (inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense ). From January to March 2016, soil N2O emission, forage accumulation (FA) and relative emission (RE) were assessed during two 28-day cycles. The FA was greater in the U80 and AS80 than in control and IAB. The highest peaks of soil N2O flux occurred from 4 to 7 days after N fertilization, primarily in the highest N rates treatments. Overall, 40 kg N/ha resulted in higher N2O flux than control and IAB, which were lower than 80 kg N/ha regardless of the N source. The lowest fluxes occurred in the control and IAB (below 20 ug N-N2O m-2 hr-1). All of the emission factors (EF) calculated for both fertilizers and rates were lower than 0.35%, which is below the 1% established by the IPCC. Our results indicate the need for discussion of the EF in the pasture intensification to contribute to avoid deforestation and mitigating emissions. The inputs of 40 kg N/ha per application with urea or ammonium sulfate, due to the low EF and RE, are recommended as a pasture N input strategy in the Brazilian Amazon.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-01
2021
2022-01-29T02:06:21Z
2022-01-29T02:06:21Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Grassland Science, v. 67, n. 1, p. 63-72, Jan. 2021
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1129729
https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12287
identifier_str_mv Grassland Science, v. 67, n. 1, p. 63-72, Jan. 2021
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1129729
https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12287
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503516927033344