Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: CAMARA, G.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: SIMÕES, R., RUIVO, H. M., ANDRADE, P. R., SOTERRONI, A. C., RAMOS, F. M., RAMOS, R. G., SCARABELLO, M., ALMEIDA, C., SANCHES, I., MAURANO, L., COUTINHO, A. C., ESQUERDO, J. C. D. M., ANTUNES, J. F. G., VENTURIERI, A., ADAMI, M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1153847
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd20a
Resumo: This study examines how land tenure constrains Brazil's ability to meet its deforestation control and forest restoration goals in its Amazonia biome. Our findings are based on an updated assessment of land tenure and land use in the region. Between 2019 and 2021, 44% of deforestation in Amazonia occurred in private lands, while forest removal in settlements ranged from 31% to 27% of the total. Deforestation in undesignated public lands increased from 11% in 2008 to 18% in 2021. Deforestation is highly concentrated, with 1% of properties accounting for 82.5% of forest cuts in 2021. In Amazonia, there is considerable non-compliance with the legal reserve provisions set by Brazil's Forest Code. Legal reserve deficits in private lands sum up to 18.17?Mha (million hectares), compared with 12.49?Mha of legal reserve surpluses. Even if all forest surpluses are offered in the forest credits market set in the Forest Code, farmers still need to restore 5.67?Mha to comply with the law. Large-scale cattle ranchers have a legal reserve deficit of 10.35?Mha (34% of their area). Most crop farming occurs in medium and large properties (4.63?Mha) with a large proportion of legal reserve deficits (45%). Given the political power and financial resources of large ranchers and crop producers, Brazil faces major challenges in inducing these farmers to meet their legal obligations. Therefore, Brazil needs to combine robust command-and-control strategies with market-based policies to achieve its deforestation and forest restoration goals. The government should tailor forest protection and restoration policies to the needs of different landowners, considering their land use practices, technical capacity, and financial resources.
id EMBR_7c1f35b29729b948d7862675b1d730e8
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1153847
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.Recuperação florestalBrazilian AmazoniaPolítica de uso da terra no BrasilCódigo florestal brasileiroCadastro Ambiental RuralCARBrazil´s Forest CodeBrazil´s NDCLand use policy in BrazilDesmatamentoPosse de TerraImpacto AmbientalLand useLand ownershipLand tenureEnvironmental impactDeforestationForest restorationThis study examines how land tenure constrains Brazil's ability to meet its deforestation control and forest restoration goals in its Amazonia biome. Our findings are based on an updated assessment of land tenure and land use in the region. Between 2019 and 2021, 44% of deforestation in Amazonia occurred in private lands, while forest removal in settlements ranged from 31% to 27% of the total. Deforestation in undesignated public lands increased from 11% in 2008 to 18% in 2021. Deforestation is highly concentrated, with 1% of properties accounting for 82.5% of forest cuts in 2021. In Amazonia, there is considerable non-compliance with the legal reserve provisions set by Brazil's Forest Code. Legal reserve deficits in private lands sum up to 18.17?Mha (million hectares), compared with 12.49?Mha of legal reserve surpluses. Even if all forest surpluses are offered in the forest credits market set in the Forest Code, farmers still need to restore 5.67?Mha to comply with the law. Large-scale cattle ranchers have a legal reserve deficit of 10.35?Mha (34% of their area). Most crop farming occurs in medium and large properties (4.63?Mha) with a large proportion of legal reserve deficits (45%). Given the political power and financial resources of large ranchers and crop producers, Brazil faces major challenges in inducing these farmers to meet their legal obligations. Therefore, Brazil needs to combine robust command-and-control strategies with market-based policies to achieve its deforestation and forest restoration goals. The government should tailor forest protection and restoration policies to the needs of different landowners, considering their land use practices, technical capacity, and financial resources.Na publicação: Alexandre Coutinho, Julio Esquerdo, João Antunes.GILBERTO CAMARA, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; ROLF SIMOES, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; HELOISA M. RUIVO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; PEDRO R. ANDRADE, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; ALINE C. SOTERRONI, UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD; FERNANDO M. RAMOS, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; RAFAEL G. RAMOS, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; MARLUCE SCARABELLO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; CLAUDIO ALMEIDA, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; IEDA SANCHES, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; LUIS MAURANO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; ALEXANDRE CAMARGO COUTINHO, CNPTIA; JULIO CESAR DALLA MORA ESQUERDO, CNPTIA; JOAO FRANCISCO GONCALVES ANTUNES, CNPTIA; ADRIANO VENTURIERI, CPATU; MARCOS ADAMI, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS.CAMARA, G.SIMÕES, R.RUIVO, H. M.ANDRADE, P. R.SOTERRONI, A. C.RAMOS, F. M.RAMOS, R. G.SCARABELLO, M.ALMEIDA, C.SANCHES, I.MAURANO, L.COUTINHO, A. C.ESQUERDO, J. C. D. M.ANTUNES, J. F. G.VENTURIERI, A.ADAMI, M.2023-05-19T17:47:44Z2023-05-19T17:47:44Z2023-05-192023info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleEnvironmental Research Letters, v. 18, n. 6, 065005, 2023.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1153847https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd20aenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2023-05-19T17:47:44Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1153847Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542023-05-19T17:47:44falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542023-05-19T17:47:44Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.
title Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.
spellingShingle Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.
CAMARA, G.
Recuperação florestal
Brazilian Amazonia
Política de uso da terra no Brasil
Código florestal brasileiro
Cadastro Ambiental Rural
CAR
Brazil´s Forest Code
Brazil´s NDC
Land use policy in Brazil
Desmatamento
Posse de Terra
Impacto Ambiental
Land use
Land ownership
Land tenure
Environmental impact
Deforestation
Forest restoration
title_short Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.
title_full Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.
title_fullStr Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.
title_sort Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.
author CAMARA, G.
author_facet CAMARA, G.
SIMÕES, R.
RUIVO, H. M.
ANDRADE, P. R.
SOTERRONI, A. C.
RAMOS, F. M.
RAMOS, R. G.
SCARABELLO, M.
ALMEIDA, C.
SANCHES, I.
MAURANO, L.
COUTINHO, A. C.
ESQUERDO, J. C. D. M.
ANTUNES, J. F. G.
VENTURIERI, A.
ADAMI, M.
author_role author
author2 SIMÕES, R.
RUIVO, H. M.
ANDRADE, P. R.
SOTERRONI, A. C.
RAMOS, F. M.
RAMOS, R. G.
SCARABELLO, M.
ALMEIDA, C.
SANCHES, I.
MAURANO, L.
COUTINHO, A. C.
ESQUERDO, J. C. D. M.
ANTUNES, J. F. G.
VENTURIERI, A.
ADAMI, M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv GILBERTO CAMARA, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; ROLF SIMOES, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; HELOISA M. RUIVO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; PEDRO R. ANDRADE, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; ALINE C. SOTERRONI, UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD; FERNANDO M. RAMOS, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; RAFAEL G. RAMOS, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; MARLUCE SCARABELLO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; CLAUDIO ALMEIDA, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; IEDA SANCHES, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; LUIS MAURANO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; ALEXANDRE CAMARGO COUTINHO, CNPTIA; JULIO CESAR DALLA MORA ESQUERDO, CNPTIA; JOAO FRANCISCO GONCALVES ANTUNES, CNPTIA; ADRIANO VENTURIERI, CPATU; MARCOS ADAMI, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv CAMARA, G.
SIMÕES, R.
RUIVO, H. M.
ANDRADE, P. R.
SOTERRONI, A. C.
RAMOS, F. M.
RAMOS, R. G.
SCARABELLO, M.
ALMEIDA, C.
SANCHES, I.
MAURANO, L.
COUTINHO, A. C.
ESQUERDO, J. C. D. M.
ANTUNES, J. F. G.
VENTURIERI, A.
ADAMI, M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Recuperação florestal
Brazilian Amazonia
Política de uso da terra no Brasil
Código florestal brasileiro
Cadastro Ambiental Rural
CAR
Brazil´s Forest Code
Brazil´s NDC
Land use policy in Brazil
Desmatamento
Posse de Terra
Impacto Ambiental
Land use
Land ownership
Land tenure
Environmental impact
Deforestation
Forest restoration
topic Recuperação florestal
Brazilian Amazonia
Política de uso da terra no Brasil
Código florestal brasileiro
Cadastro Ambiental Rural
CAR
Brazil´s Forest Code
Brazil´s NDC
Land use policy in Brazil
Desmatamento
Posse de Terra
Impacto Ambiental
Land use
Land ownership
Land tenure
Environmental impact
Deforestation
Forest restoration
description This study examines how land tenure constrains Brazil's ability to meet its deforestation control and forest restoration goals in its Amazonia biome. Our findings are based on an updated assessment of land tenure and land use in the region. Between 2019 and 2021, 44% of deforestation in Amazonia occurred in private lands, while forest removal in settlements ranged from 31% to 27% of the total. Deforestation in undesignated public lands increased from 11% in 2008 to 18% in 2021. Deforestation is highly concentrated, with 1% of properties accounting for 82.5% of forest cuts in 2021. In Amazonia, there is considerable non-compliance with the legal reserve provisions set by Brazil's Forest Code. Legal reserve deficits in private lands sum up to 18.17?Mha (million hectares), compared with 12.49?Mha of legal reserve surpluses. Even if all forest surpluses are offered in the forest credits market set in the Forest Code, farmers still need to restore 5.67?Mha to comply with the law. Large-scale cattle ranchers have a legal reserve deficit of 10.35?Mha (34% of their area). Most crop farming occurs in medium and large properties (4.63?Mha) with a large proportion of legal reserve deficits (45%). Given the political power and financial resources of large ranchers and crop producers, Brazil faces major challenges in inducing these farmers to meet their legal obligations. Therefore, Brazil needs to combine robust command-and-control strategies with market-based policies to achieve its deforestation and forest restoration goals. The government should tailor forest protection and restoration policies to the needs of different landowners, considering their land use practices, technical capacity, and financial resources.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-19T17:47:44Z
2023-05-19T17:47:44Z
2023-05-19
2023
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Environmental Research Letters, v. 18, n. 6, 065005, 2023.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1153847
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd20a
identifier_str_mv Environmental Research Letters, v. 18, n. 6, 065005, 2023.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1153847
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd20a
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503545103319040