Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1110190 http://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.089317 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper was to compare methods and sampling procedures applied to eucalyptus grown under different spatial arrangements in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system (ICLF). The study was carried out in Sinop county, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Arrangements combining fixed and variable area methods to simple random and systematic sampling were tested. Precision, accuracy, efficiency, and diameter-distribution measurements were used for selection of the best sampling arrangement. The sampling intensity, sample unit optimal size and the relative efficiency have been changed depending on the spatial arrangement for 10% sampling error and 95% probability level. The fixed area method based on systematic sampling, as well as smaller sample units with eight to nine plants (48 m2 to 54 m2) were the most accurate; however, larger plots (192 m2 to 216 m2) were more efficient. All sample units size provided good estimates on the number of trees by diameter classes. |
id |
EMBR_9388bb9621c6833eca8e25239c02d5a4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1110190 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.Agroforestry systemsForest inventoryEucalyptusThe aim of this paper was to compare methods and sampling procedures applied to eucalyptus grown under different spatial arrangements in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system (ICLF). The study was carried out in Sinop county, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Arrangements combining fixed and variable area methods to simple random and systematic sampling were tested. Precision, accuracy, efficiency, and diameter-distribution measurements were used for selection of the best sampling arrangement. The sampling intensity, sample unit optimal size and the relative efficiency have been changed depending on the spatial arrangement for 10% sampling error and 95% probability level. The fixed area method based on systematic sampling, as well as smaller sample units with eight to nine plants (48 m2 to 54 m2) were the most accurate; however, larger plots (192 m2 to 216 m2) were more efficient. All sample units size provided good estimates on the number of trees by diameter classes.HELIO TONINI, CPPSUL; CHARLOTE WINK, UFMT, Sinop, MT; ANDREY GREGORY DA MOTA FERREIRA E SILVA, UFMT, Sinop, MT.TONINI, H.WINK, C.SILVA, A. G. da M. F. e2019-07-02T00:41:03Z2019-07-02T00:41:03Z2019-07-0120192019-12-04T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleFloresta e Ambiente, v. 26, n. 3, e20170893, 2019.2179-8087http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1110190http://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.089317enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2019-07-02T00:41:09Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1110190Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542019-07-02T00:41:09Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system. |
title |
Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system. |
spellingShingle |
Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system. TONINI, H. Agroforestry systems Forest inventory Eucalyptus |
title_short |
Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system. |
title_full |
Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system. |
title_fullStr |
Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system. |
title_sort |
Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system. |
author |
TONINI, H. |
author_facet |
TONINI, H. WINK, C. SILVA, A. G. da M. F. e |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
WINK, C. SILVA, A. G. da M. F. e |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
HELIO TONINI, CPPSUL; CHARLOTE WINK, UFMT, Sinop, MT; ANDREY GREGORY DA MOTA FERREIRA E SILVA, UFMT, Sinop, MT. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
TONINI, H. WINK, C. SILVA, A. G. da M. F. e |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Agroforestry systems Forest inventory Eucalyptus |
topic |
Agroforestry systems Forest inventory Eucalyptus |
description |
The aim of this paper was to compare methods and sampling procedures applied to eucalyptus grown under different spatial arrangements in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system (ICLF). The study was carried out in Sinop county, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Arrangements combining fixed and variable area methods to simple random and systematic sampling were tested. Precision, accuracy, efficiency, and diameter-distribution measurements were used for selection of the best sampling arrangement. The sampling intensity, sample unit optimal size and the relative efficiency have been changed depending on the spatial arrangement for 10% sampling error and 95% probability level. The fixed area method based on systematic sampling, as well as smaller sample units with eight to nine plants (48 m2 to 54 m2) were the most accurate; however, larger plots (192 m2 to 216 m2) were more efficient. All sample units size provided good estimates on the number of trees by diameter classes. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-02T00:41:03Z 2019-07-02T00:41:03Z 2019-07-01 2019 2019-12-04T11:11:11Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente, v. 26, n. 3, e20170893, 2019. 2179-8087 http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1110190 http://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.089317 |
identifier_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente, v. 26, n. 3, e20170893, 2019. 2179-8087 |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1110190 http://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.089317 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1822721402775535616 |