Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: TONINI, H.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: WINK, C., SILVA, A. G. da M. F. e
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1110190
http://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.089317
Resumo: The aim of this paper was to compare methods and sampling procedures applied to eucalyptus grown under different spatial arrangements in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system (ICLF). The study was carried out in Sinop county, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Arrangements combining fixed and variable area methods to simple random and systematic sampling were tested. Precision, accuracy, efficiency, and diameter-distribution measurements were used for selection of the best sampling arrangement. The sampling intensity, sample unit optimal size and the relative efficiency have been changed depending on the spatial arrangement for 10% sampling error and 95% probability level. The fixed area method based on systematic sampling, as well as smaller sample units with eight to nine plants (48 m2 to 54 m2) were the most accurate; however, larger plots (192 m2 to 216 m2) were more efficient. All sample units size provided good estimates on the number of trees by diameter classes.
id EMBR_9388bb9621c6833eca8e25239c02d5a4
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1110190
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.Agroforestry systemsForest inventoryEucalyptusThe aim of this paper was to compare methods and sampling procedures applied to eucalyptus grown under different spatial arrangements in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system (ICLF). The study was carried out in Sinop county, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Arrangements combining fixed and variable area methods to simple random and systematic sampling were tested. Precision, accuracy, efficiency, and diameter-distribution measurements were used for selection of the best sampling arrangement. The sampling intensity, sample unit optimal size and the relative efficiency have been changed depending on the spatial arrangement for 10% sampling error and 95% probability level. The fixed area method based on systematic sampling, as well as smaller sample units with eight to nine plants (48 m2 to 54 m2) were the most accurate; however, larger plots (192 m2 to 216 m2) were more efficient. All sample units size provided good estimates on the number of trees by diameter classes.HELIO TONINI, CPPSUL; CHARLOTE WINK, UFMT, Sinop, MT; ANDREY GREGORY DA MOTA FERREIRA E SILVA, UFMT, Sinop, MT.TONINI, H.WINK, C.SILVA, A. G. da M. F. e2019-07-02T00:41:03Z2019-07-02T00:41:03Z2019-07-0120192019-12-04T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleFloresta e Ambiente, v. 26, n. 3, e20170893, 2019.2179-8087http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1110190http://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.089317enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2019-07-02T00:41:09Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1110190Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542019-07-02T00:41:09falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542019-07-02T00:41:09Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.
title Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.
spellingShingle Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.
TONINI, H.
Agroforestry systems
Forest inventory
Eucalyptus
title_short Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.
title_full Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.
title_fullStr Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.
title_full_unstemmed Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.
title_sort Sampling alternatives for Eucalyptus trees in integrated crop-livestock-forest system.
author TONINI, H.
author_facet TONINI, H.
WINK, C.
SILVA, A. G. da M. F. e
author_role author
author2 WINK, C.
SILVA, A. G. da M. F. e
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv HELIO TONINI, CPPSUL; CHARLOTE WINK, UFMT, Sinop, MT; ANDREY GREGORY DA MOTA FERREIRA E SILVA, UFMT, Sinop, MT.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv TONINI, H.
WINK, C.
SILVA, A. G. da M. F. e
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agroforestry systems
Forest inventory
Eucalyptus
topic Agroforestry systems
Forest inventory
Eucalyptus
description The aim of this paper was to compare methods and sampling procedures applied to eucalyptus grown under different spatial arrangements in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system (ICLF). The study was carried out in Sinop county, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Arrangements combining fixed and variable area methods to simple random and systematic sampling were tested. Precision, accuracy, efficiency, and diameter-distribution measurements were used for selection of the best sampling arrangement. The sampling intensity, sample unit optimal size and the relative efficiency have been changed depending on the spatial arrangement for 10% sampling error and 95% probability level. The fixed area method based on systematic sampling, as well as smaller sample units with eight to nine plants (48 m2 to 54 m2) were the most accurate; however, larger plots (192 m2 to 216 m2) were more efficient. All sample units size provided good estimates on the number of trees by diameter classes.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-02T00:41:03Z
2019-07-02T00:41:03Z
2019-07-01
2019
2019-12-04T11:11:11Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente, v. 26, n. 3, e20170893, 2019.
2179-8087
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1110190
http://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.089317
identifier_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente, v. 26, n. 3, e20170893, 2019.
2179-8087
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1110190
http://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.089317
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503476554760192