Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150823 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1071156 |
Resumo: | Genomic selection has been promising in situations where phenotypic assessments are expensive, laborious, and/or inefficient. This work evaluated the efficiency of genomic prediction methods combined with genetic models in clone and parent selection with the goal of increasing fresh root yield, dry root yield, as well as dry matter content in cassava roots. The bias and predictive ability of the combinations of prediction methods Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP), Bayes B, Bayes Cr, and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces with additive and additive-dominant genetic models were estimated. Fresh and dry root yield exhibited predominantly dominant heritability, while dry matter content exhibited predominantly additive heritability. The combination of prediction methods and genetic models did not show significant differences in the predictive ability for dry matter content. On the other hand, the prediction methods with additive-dominant genetic models had significantly higher predictive ability than the additive genetic models for fresh and dry root yield, allowing higher genetic gains in clone selection. However, higher predictive ability for genotypic values did not result in differences in breeding value predictions between additive and additive-dominant genetic models. G-BLUP with the classical additive-dominant genetic model had the best predictive ability and bias estimates for fresh and dry root yield. For dry matter content, the highest predictive ability was obtained by G-BLUP with the additive genetic model. Dry matter content exhibited the highest heritability, predictive ability, and bias estimates compared with other traits. The prediction methods showed similar selection gains with approximately 67% of the phenotypic selection gain. By shortening the breeding cycle time by 40%, genomic selection may overcome phenotypic selection by 10%, 13%, and 18% for fresh root yield, dry root yield, and dry matter content, respectively, with a selection proportion of 15%. The most suitable genetic model for each trait allows for genomic selection optimization in cassava with high selection gains, thereby accelerating the release of new varieties. |
id |
EMBR_998e784637ffc5abe3e090b4e24eeb09 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1150823 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.GenomicsNatural selectionBreeding valuePlant breedingCassavaClonesGenomic selection has been promising in situations where phenotypic assessments are expensive, laborious, and/or inefficient. This work evaluated the efficiency of genomic prediction methods combined with genetic models in clone and parent selection with the goal of increasing fresh root yield, dry root yield, as well as dry matter content in cassava roots. The bias and predictive ability of the combinations of prediction methods Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP), Bayes B, Bayes Cr, and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces with additive and additive-dominant genetic models were estimated. Fresh and dry root yield exhibited predominantly dominant heritability, while dry matter content exhibited predominantly additive heritability. The combination of prediction methods and genetic models did not show significant differences in the predictive ability for dry matter content. On the other hand, the prediction methods with additive-dominant genetic models had significantly higher predictive ability than the additive genetic models for fresh and dry root yield, allowing higher genetic gains in clone selection. However, higher predictive ability for genotypic values did not result in differences in breeding value predictions between additive and additive-dominant genetic models. G-BLUP with the classical additive-dominant genetic model had the best predictive ability and bias estimates for fresh and dry root yield. For dry matter content, the highest predictive ability was obtained by G-BLUP with the additive genetic model. Dry matter content exhibited the highest heritability, predictive ability, and bias estimates compared with other traits. The prediction methods showed similar selection gains with approximately 67% of the phenotypic selection gain. By shortening the breeding cycle time by 40%, genomic selection may overcome phenotypic selection by 10%, 13%, and 18% for fresh root yield, dry root yield, and dry matter content, respectively, with a selection proportion of 15%. The most suitable genetic model for each trait allows for genomic selection optimization in cassava with high selection gains, thereby accelerating the release of new varieties.LUCIANO ROGÉRIO BRAATZ DE ANDRADE, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; MASSAINE BANDEIRA E SOUSA, EMBRAPA MANDIOCA E FRUTICULTURA; MARNIN WOLFE, AUBURN UNIVERSITY; JEAN-LUC JANNINK, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPCa; CAMILA FERREIRA AZEVEDO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; EDER JORGE DE OLIVEIRA, CNPMF.ANDRADE, L. R. B. deSOUSA, M. B. eWOLFE, M.JANNINK, J. L.RESENDE, M. D. V. deAZEVEDO, C. F.OLIVEIRA, E. J. de2023-01-10T12:01:18Z2023-01-10T12:01:18Z2023-01-102022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleFrontiers in Plant Science, v. 13, article 1071156, 2022.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150823https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1071156enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2023-01-10T12:01:18Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1150823Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542023-01-10T12:01:18falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542023-01-10T12:01:18Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones. |
title |
Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones. |
spellingShingle |
Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones. ANDRADE, L. R. B. de Genomics Natural selection Breeding value Plant breeding Cassava Clones |
title_short |
Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones. |
title_full |
Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones. |
title_fullStr |
Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones. |
title_sort |
Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones. |
author |
ANDRADE, L. R. B. de |
author_facet |
ANDRADE, L. R. B. de SOUSA, M. B. e WOLFE, M. JANNINK, J. L. RESENDE, M. D. V. de AZEVEDO, C. F. OLIVEIRA, E. J. de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
SOUSA, M. B. e WOLFE, M. JANNINK, J. L. RESENDE, M. D. V. de AZEVEDO, C. F. OLIVEIRA, E. J. de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
LUCIANO ROGÉRIO BRAATZ DE ANDRADE, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; MASSAINE BANDEIRA E SOUSA, EMBRAPA MANDIOCA E FRUTICULTURA; MARNIN WOLFE, AUBURN UNIVERSITY; JEAN-LUC JANNINK, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPCa; CAMILA FERREIRA AZEVEDO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; EDER JORGE DE OLIVEIRA, CNPMF. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
ANDRADE, L. R. B. de SOUSA, M. B. e WOLFE, M. JANNINK, J. L. RESENDE, M. D. V. de AZEVEDO, C. F. OLIVEIRA, E. J. de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Genomics Natural selection Breeding value Plant breeding Cassava Clones |
topic |
Genomics Natural selection Breeding value Plant breeding Cassava Clones |
description |
Genomic selection has been promising in situations where phenotypic assessments are expensive, laborious, and/or inefficient. This work evaluated the efficiency of genomic prediction methods combined with genetic models in clone and parent selection with the goal of increasing fresh root yield, dry root yield, as well as dry matter content in cassava roots. The bias and predictive ability of the combinations of prediction methods Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP), Bayes B, Bayes Cr, and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces with additive and additive-dominant genetic models were estimated. Fresh and dry root yield exhibited predominantly dominant heritability, while dry matter content exhibited predominantly additive heritability. The combination of prediction methods and genetic models did not show significant differences in the predictive ability for dry matter content. On the other hand, the prediction methods with additive-dominant genetic models had significantly higher predictive ability than the additive genetic models for fresh and dry root yield, allowing higher genetic gains in clone selection. However, higher predictive ability for genotypic values did not result in differences in breeding value predictions between additive and additive-dominant genetic models. G-BLUP with the classical additive-dominant genetic model had the best predictive ability and bias estimates for fresh and dry root yield. For dry matter content, the highest predictive ability was obtained by G-BLUP with the additive genetic model. Dry matter content exhibited the highest heritability, predictive ability, and bias estimates compared with other traits. The prediction methods showed similar selection gains with approximately 67% of the phenotypic selection gain. By shortening the breeding cycle time by 40%, genomic selection may overcome phenotypic selection by 10%, 13%, and 18% for fresh root yield, dry root yield, and dry matter content, respectively, with a selection proportion of 15%. The most suitable genetic model for each trait allows for genomic selection optimization in cassava with high selection gains, thereby accelerating the release of new varieties. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 2023-01-10T12:01:18Z 2023-01-10T12:01:18Z 2023-01-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 13, article 1071156, 2022. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150823 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1071156 |
identifier_str_mv |
Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 13, article 1071156, 2022. |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150823 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1071156 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503537468637184 |