Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ANDRADE, L. R. B. de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: SOUSA, M. B. e, WOLFE, M., JANNINK, J. L., RESENDE, M. D. V. de, AZEVEDO, C. F., OLIVEIRA, E. J. de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150823
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1071156
Resumo: Genomic selection has been promising in situations where phenotypic assessments are expensive, laborious, and/or inefficient. This work evaluated the efficiency of genomic prediction methods combined with genetic models in clone and parent selection with the goal of increasing fresh root yield, dry root yield, as well as dry matter content in cassava roots. The bias and predictive ability of the combinations of prediction methods Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP), Bayes B, Bayes Cr, and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces with additive and additive-dominant genetic models were estimated. Fresh and dry root yield exhibited predominantly dominant heritability, while dry matter content exhibited predominantly additive heritability. The combination of prediction methods and genetic models did not show significant differences in the predictive ability for dry matter content. On the other hand, the prediction methods with additive-dominant genetic models had significantly higher predictive ability than the additive genetic models for fresh and dry root yield, allowing higher genetic gains in clone selection. However, higher predictive ability for genotypic values did not result in differences in breeding value predictions between additive and additive-dominant genetic models. G-BLUP with the classical additive-dominant genetic model had the best predictive ability and bias estimates for fresh and dry root yield. For dry matter content, the highest predictive ability was obtained by G-BLUP with the additive genetic model. Dry matter content exhibited the highest heritability, predictive ability, and bias estimates compared with other traits. The prediction methods showed similar selection gains with approximately 67% of the phenotypic selection gain. By shortening the breeding cycle time by 40%, genomic selection may overcome phenotypic selection by 10%, 13%, and 18% for fresh root yield, dry root yield, and dry matter content, respectively, with a selection proportion of 15%. The most suitable genetic model for each trait allows for genomic selection optimization in cassava with high selection gains, thereby accelerating the release of new varieties.
id EMBR_998e784637ffc5abe3e090b4e24eeb09
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1150823
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.GenomicsNatural selectionBreeding valuePlant breedingCassavaClonesGenomic selection has been promising in situations where phenotypic assessments are expensive, laborious, and/or inefficient. This work evaluated the efficiency of genomic prediction methods combined with genetic models in clone and parent selection with the goal of increasing fresh root yield, dry root yield, as well as dry matter content in cassava roots. The bias and predictive ability of the combinations of prediction methods Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP), Bayes B, Bayes Cr, and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces with additive and additive-dominant genetic models were estimated. Fresh and dry root yield exhibited predominantly dominant heritability, while dry matter content exhibited predominantly additive heritability. The combination of prediction methods and genetic models did not show significant differences in the predictive ability for dry matter content. On the other hand, the prediction methods with additive-dominant genetic models had significantly higher predictive ability than the additive genetic models for fresh and dry root yield, allowing higher genetic gains in clone selection. However, higher predictive ability for genotypic values did not result in differences in breeding value predictions between additive and additive-dominant genetic models. G-BLUP with the classical additive-dominant genetic model had the best predictive ability and bias estimates for fresh and dry root yield. For dry matter content, the highest predictive ability was obtained by G-BLUP with the additive genetic model. Dry matter content exhibited the highest heritability, predictive ability, and bias estimates compared with other traits. The prediction methods showed similar selection gains with approximately 67% of the phenotypic selection gain. By shortening the breeding cycle time by 40%, genomic selection may overcome phenotypic selection by 10%, 13%, and 18% for fresh root yield, dry root yield, and dry matter content, respectively, with a selection proportion of 15%. The most suitable genetic model for each trait allows for genomic selection optimization in cassava with high selection gains, thereby accelerating the release of new varieties.LUCIANO ROGÉRIO BRAATZ DE ANDRADE, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; MASSAINE BANDEIRA E SOUSA, EMBRAPA MANDIOCA E FRUTICULTURA; MARNIN WOLFE, AUBURN UNIVERSITY; JEAN-LUC JANNINK, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPCa; CAMILA FERREIRA AZEVEDO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; EDER JORGE DE OLIVEIRA, CNPMF.ANDRADE, L. R. B. deSOUSA, M. B. eWOLFE, M.JANNINK, J. L.RESENDE, M. D. V. deAZEVEDO, C. F.OLIVEIRA, E. J. de2023-01-10T12:01:18Z2023-01-10T12:01:18Z2023-01-102022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleFrontiers in Plant Science, v. 13, article 1071156, 2022.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150823https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1071156enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2023-01-10T12:01:18Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1150823Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542023-01-10T12:01:18falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542023-01-10T12:01:18Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.
title Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.
spellingShingle Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.
ANDRADE, L. R. B. de
Genomics
Natural selection
Breeding value
Plant breeding
Cassava
Clones
title_short Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.
title_full Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.
title_fullStr Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.
title_full_unstemmed Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.
title_sort Increasing cassava root yield: additive-dominant genetic models for selection of parents and clones.
author ANDRADE, L. R. B. de
author_facet ANDRADE, L. R. B. de
SOUSA, M. B. e
WOLFE, M.
JANNINK, J. L.
RESENDE, M. D. V. de
AZEVEDO, C. F.
OLIVEIRA, E. J. de
author_role author
author2 SOUSA, M. B. e
WOLFE, M.
JANNINK, J. L.
RESENDE, M. D. V. de
AZEVEDO, C. F.
OLIVEIRA, E. J. de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv LUCIANO ROGÉRIO BRAATZ DE ANDRADE, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; MASSAINE BANDEIRA E SOUSA, EMBRAPA MANDIOCA E FRUTICULTURA; MARNIN WOLFE, AUBURN UNIVERSITY; JEAN-LUC JANNINK, CORNELL UNIVERSITY; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPCa; CAMILA FERREIRA AZEVEDO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VIÇOSA; EDER JORGE DE OLIVEIRA, CNPMF.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ANDRADE, L. R. B. de
SOUSA, M. B. e
WOLFE, M.
JANNINK, J. L.
RESENDE, M. D. V. de
AZEVEDO, C. F.
OLIVEIRA, E. J. de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Genomics
Natural selection
Breeding value
Plant breeding
Cassava
Clones
topic Genomics
Natural selection
Breeding value
Plant breeding
Cassava
Clones
description Genomic selection has been promising in situations where phenotypic assessments are expensive, laborious, and/or inefficient. This work evaluated the efficiency of genomic prediction methods combined with genetic models in clone and parent selection with the goal of increasing fresh root yield, dry root yield, as well as dry matter content in cassava roots. The bias and predictive ability of the combinations of prediction methods Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP), Bayes B, Bayes Cr, and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces with additive and additive-dominant genetic models were estimated. Fresh and dry root yield exhibited predominantly dominant heritability, while dry matter content exhibited predominantly additive heritability. The combination of prediction methods and genetic models did not show significant differences in the predictive ability for dry matter content. On the other hand, the prediction methods with additive-dominant genetic models had significantly higher predictive ability than the additive genetic models for fresh and dry root yield, allowing higher genetic gains in clone selection. However, higher predictive ability for genotypic values did not result in differences in breeding value predictions between additive and additive-dominant genetic models. G-BLUP with the classical additive-dominant genetic model had the best predictive ability and bias estimates for fresh and dry root yield. For dry matter content, the highest predictive ability was obtained by G-BLUP with the additive genetic model. Dry matter content exhibited the highest heritability, predictive ability, and bias estimates compared with other traits. The prediction methods showed similar selection gains with approximately 67% of the phenotypic selection gain. By shortening the breeding cycle time by 40%, genomic selection may overcome phenotypic selection by 10%, 13%, and 18% for fresh root yield, dry root yield, and dry matter content, respectively, with a selection proportion of 15%. The most suitable genetic model for each trait allows for genomic selection optimization in cassava with high selection gains, thereby accelerating the release of new varieties.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2023-01-10T12:01:18Z
2023-01-10T12:01:18Z
2023-01-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 13, article 1071156, 2022.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150823
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1071156
identifier_str_mv Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 13, article 1071156, 2022.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150823
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1071156
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503537468637184