Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PADILHA, A. H.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: COBUCI, J., COSTA, C. N., BRACCINI NETO, J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1043453
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0498
Resumo: The aim of this study was to compare two random regression models (RRM) fitted by fourth (RRM4) and fifth-order Legendre polynomials (RRM5) with a lactation model (LM) for evaluating Holstein cattle in Brazil. Two datasets with the same animals were prepared for this study. To apply test-day RRM and LMs, 262,426 test day records and 30,228 lactation records covering 305 days were prepared, respectively. The lowest values of Akaike?s information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, and estimates of the maximum of the likelihood function (?2LogL) were for RRM4. Heritability for 305-day milk yield (305MY) was 0.23 (RRM4), 0.24 (RRM5), and 0.21 (LM). Heritability, additive genetic and permanent environmental variances of test days on days in milk was from 0.16 to 0.27, from 3.76 to 6.88 and from 11.12 to 20.21, respectively. Additive genetic correlations between test days ranged from 0.20 to 0.99. Permanent environmental correlations between test days were between 0.07 and 0.99. Standard deviations of average estimated breeding values (EBVs) for 305MY from RRM4 and RRM5 were from 11% to 30% higher for bulls and around 28% higher for cows than that in LM. Rank correlations between RRM EBVs and LM EBVs were between 0.86 to 0.96 for bulls and 0.80 to 0.87 for cows. Average percentage of gain in reliability of EBVs for 305-day yield increased from 4% to 17% for bulls and from 23% to 24% for cows when reliability of EBVs from RRM models was compared to those from LM model. Random regression model fitted by fourth order Legendre polynomials is recommended for genetic evaluations of Brazilian Holstein cattle because of the higher reliability in the estimation of breeding values.
id EMBR_9d2dc4b1bb379d06779882f48640670d
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1043453
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.Legendre Polynomials305-Day Milk YieldBreeding ValuesBrazilian HolsteinreliabilityThe aim of this study was to compare two random regression models (RRM) fitted by fourth (RRM4) and fifth-order Legendre polynomials (RRM5) with a lactation model (LM) for evaluating Holstein cattle in Brazil. Two datasets with the same animals were prepared for this study. To apply test-day RRM and LMs, 262,426 test day records and 30,228 lactation records covering 305 days were prepared, respectively. The lowest values of Akaike?s information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, and estimates of the maximum of the likelihood function (?2LogL) were for RRM4. Heritability for 305-day milk yield (305MY) was 0.23 (RRM4), 0.24 (RRM5), and 0.21 (LM). Heritability, additive genetic and permanent environmental variances of test days on days in milk was from 0.16 to 0.27, from 3.76 to 6.88 and from 11.12 to 20.21, respectively. Additive genetic correlations between test days ranged from 0.20 to 0.99. Permanent environmental correlations between test days were between 0.07 and 0.99. Standard deviations of average estimated breeding values (EBVs) for 305MY from RRM4 and RRM5 were from 11% to 30% higher for bulls and around 28% higher for cows than that in LM. Rank correlations between RRM EBVs and LM EBVs were between 0.86 to 0.96 for bulls and 0.80 to 0.87 for cows. Average percentage of gain in reliability of EBVs for 305-day yield increased from 4% to 17% for bulls and from 23% to 24% for cows when reliability of EBVs from RRM models was compared to those from LM model. Random regression model fitted by fourth order Legendre polynomials is recommended for genetic evaluations of Brazilian Holstein cattle because of the higher reliability in the estimation of breeding values.CLAUDIO NAPOLIS COSTA, CNPGL.PADILHA, A. H.COBUCI, J.COSTA, C. N.BRACCINI NETO, J.2022-08-10T19:20:03Z2022-08-10T19:20:03Z2016-04-152015info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article9 p.Asian-Australasian Jounal of Animal Science, v. 29, n. 6, p. 759-767, 2015.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1043453https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0498enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2022-08-10T19:20:12Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1043453Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542022-08-10T19:20:12falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542022-08-10T19:20:12Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.
title Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.
spellingShingle Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.
PADILHA, A. H.
Legendre Polynomials
305-Day Milk Yield
Breeding Values
Brazilian Holstein
reliability
title_short Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.
title_full Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.
title_fullStr Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.
title_full_unstemmed Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.
title_sort Random regression models are suitable to substitute the traditional 305-day lactation model in genetic evaluations of holstein cattle in Brazil.
author PADILHA, A. H.
author_facet PADILHA, A. H.
COBUCI, J.
COSTA, C. N.
BRACCINI NETO, J.
author_role author
author2 COBUCI, J.
COSTA, C. N.
BRACCINI NETO, J.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv CLAUDIO NAPOLIS COSTA, CNPGL.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PADILHA, A. H.
COBUCI, J.
COSTA, C. N.
BRACCINI NETO, J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Legendre Polynomials
305-Day Milk Yield
Breeding Values
Brazilian Holstein
reliability
topic Legendre Polynomials
305-Day Milk Yield
Breeding Values
Brazilian Holstein
reliability
description The aim of this study was to compare two random regression models (RRM) fitted by fourth (RRM4) and fifth-order Legendre polynomials (RRM5) with a lactation model (LM) for evaluating Holstein cattle in Brazil. Two datasets with the same animals were prepared for this study. To apply test-day RRM and LMs, 262,426 test day records and 30,228 lactation records covering 305 days were prepared, respectively. The lowest values of Akaike?s information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, and estimates of the maximum of the likelihood function (?2LogL) were for RRM4. Heritability for 305-day milk yield (305MY) was 0.23 (RRM4), 0.24 (RRM5), and 0.21 (LM). Heritability, additive genetic and permanent environmental variances of test days on days in milk was from 0.16 to 0.27, from 3.76 to 6.88 and from 11.12 to 20.21, respectively. Additive genetic correlations between test days ranged from 0.20 to 0.99. Permanent environmental correlations between test days were between 0.07 and 0.99. Standard deviations of average estimated breeding values (EBVs) for 305MY from RRM4 and RRM5 were from 11% to 30% higher for bulls and around 28% higher for cows than that in LM. Rank correlations between RRM EBVs and LM EBVs were between 0.86 to 0.96 for bulls and 0.80 to 0.87 for cows. Average percentage of gain in reliability of EBVs for 305-day yield increased from 4% to 17% for bulls and from 23% to 24% for cows when reliability of EBVs from RRM models was compared to those from LM model. Random regression model fitted by fourth order Legendre polynomials is recommended for genetic evaluations of Brazilian Holstein cattle because of the higher reliability in the estimation of breeding values.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2016-04-15
2022-08-10T19:20:03Z
2022-08-10T19:20:03Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Asian-Australasian Jounal of Animal Science, v. 29, n. 6, p. 759-767, 2015.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1043453
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0498
identifier_str_mv Asian-Australasian Jounal of Animal Science, v. 29, n. 6, p. 759-767, 2015.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1043453
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0498
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 9 p.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503527946518528