How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ALCANTARA, M. DE
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: ARES, G., DELIZA, R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150140
Resumo: A large body of evidence assessing the effectiveness of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling exists. Most experimental studies have been conducted with fictitious products. However, consumers? perception depends on several products extrinsic factors such as brand. Understanding how strong brand associations influence the effectiveness of FOP nutrition labeling schemes may be crucial to informing policymaking. In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five different variants of nutritional warnings labels (black magnifier, red magnifier, black octagon, black triangle, and red circle) on consumers? choice of commercial products, compared with two FOP nutrition labeling schemes: the guidelines daily amounts (GDAs) system and the traffic light system (TLS). An online randomized controlled trial with 1,932 participants was used to evaluate the effect of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? choices in eight sets of three commercial products, available in the Brazilian marketplace. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the influence of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? likelihood of selecting the different products in the choice task. Results showed that nutritional warnings and the TLS significantly increased the likelihood of selecting none of the products instead of the least healthful product, or a healthier product, in at least one of the product categories compared with the GDA. Warnings tended to have a larger effect, suggesting their potential to encourage healthier food choices.
id EMBR_a6593b27e8785c24144c3404e212da7e
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1150140
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?Nutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choiceA large body of evidence assessing the effectiveness of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling exists. Most experimental studies have been conducted with fictitious products. However, consumers? perception depends on several products extrinsic factors such as brand. Understanding how strong brand associations influence the effectiveness of FOP nutrition labeling schemes may be crucial to informing policymaking. In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five different variants of nutritional warnings labels (black magnifier, red magnifier, black octagon, black triangle, and red circle) on consumers? choice of commercial products, compared with two FOP nutrition labeling schemes: the guidelines daily amounts (GDAs) system and the traffic light system (TLS). An online randomized controlled trial with 1,932 participants was used to evaluate the effect of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? choices in eight sets of three commercial products, available in the Brazilian marketplace. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the influence of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? likelihood of selecting the different products in the choice task. Results showed that nutritional warnings and the TLS significantly increased the likelihood of selecting none of the products instead of the least healthful product, or a healthier product, in at least one of the product categories compared with the GDA. Warnings tended to have a larger effect, suggesting their potential to encourage healthier food choices.MARCELA DE ALCANTARA, PDJ-CNPQ; GASTÓN ARES, Universidad de la República, Pando, Uruguay; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA.ALCANTARA, M. DEARES, G.DELIZA, R.2022-12-21T13:01:38Z2022-12-21T13:01:38Z2022-12-212022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleFrontiers in Nutrition, v. 9, n. 921515, p. 1-10, 2022.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/115014010.3389/fnut.2022.921515enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2022-12-21T13:01:38Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1150140Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542022-12-21T13:01:38falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542022-12-21T13:01:38Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?
title How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?
spellingShingle How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?
ALCANTARA, M. DE
Nutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choice
title_short How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?
title_full How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?
title_fullStr How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?
title_full_unstemmed How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?
title_sort How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?
author ALCANTARA, M. DE
author_facet ALCANTARA, M. DE
ARES, G.
DELIZA, R.
author_role author
author2 ARES, G.
DELIZA, R.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv MARCELA DE ALCANTARA, PDJ-CNPQ; GASTÓN ARES, Universidad de la República, Pando, Uruguay; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ALCANTARA, M. DE
ARES, G.
DELIZA, R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choice
topic Nutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choice
description A large body of evidence assessing the effectiveness of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling exists. Most experimental studies have been conducted with fictitious products. However, consumers? perception depends on several products extrinsic factors such as brand. Understanding how strong brand associations influence the effectiveness of FOP nutrition labeling schemes may be crucial to informing policymaking. In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five different variants of nutritional warnings labels (black magnifier, red magnifier, black octagon, black triangle, and red circle) on consumers? choice of commercial products, compared with two FOP nutrition labeling schemes: the guidelines daily amounts (GDAs) system and the traffic light system (TLS). An online randomized controlled trial with 1,932 participants was used to evaluate the effect of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? choices in eight sets of three commercial products, available in the Brazilian marketplace. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the influence of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? likelihood of selecting the different products in the choice task. Results showed that nutritional warnings and the TLS significantly increased the likelihood of selecting none of the products instead of the least healthful product, or a healthier product, in at least one of the product categories compared with the GDA. Warnings tended to have a larger effect, suggesting their potential to encourage healthier food choices.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-21T13:01:38Z
2022-12-21T13:01:38Z
2022-12-21
2022
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Nutrition, v. 9, n. 921515, p. 1-10, 2022.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150140
10.3389/fnut.2022.921515
identifier_str_mv Frontiers in Nutrition, v. 9, n. 921515, p. 1-10, 2022.
10.3389/fnut.2022.921515
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150140
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503536427401216