How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150140 |
Resumo: | A large body of evidence assessing the effectiveness of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling exists. Most experimental studies have been conducted with fictitious products. However, consumers? perception depends on several products extrinsic factors such as brand. Understanding how strong brand associations influence the effectiveness of FOP nutrition labeling schemes may be crucial to informing policymaking. In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five different variants of nutritional warnings labels (black magnifier, red magnifier, black octagon, black triangle, and red circle) on consumers? choice of commercial products, compared with two FOP nutrition labeling schemes: the guidelines daily amounts (GDAs) system and the traffic light system (TLS). An online randomized controlled trial with 1,932 participants was used to evaluate the effect of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? choices in eight sets of three commercial products, available in the Brazilian marketplace. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the influence of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? likelihood of selecting the different products in the choice task. Results showed that nutritional warnings and the TLS significantly increased the likelihood of selecting none of the products instead of the least healthful product, or a healthier product, in at least one of the product categories compared with the GDA. Warnings tended to have a larger effect, suggesting their potential to encourage healthier food choices. |
id |
EMBR_a6593b27e8785c24144c3404e212da7e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1150140 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products?Nutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choiceA large body of evidence assessing the effectiveness of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling exists. Most experimental studies have been conducted with fictitious products. However, consumers? perception depends on several products extrinsic factors such as brand. Understanding how strong brand associations influence the effectiveness of FOP nutrition labeling schemes may be crucial to informing policymaking. In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five different variants of nutritional warnings labels (black magnifier, red magnifier, black octagon, black triangle, and red circle) on consumers? choice of commercial products, compared with two FOP nutrition labeling schemes: the guidelines daily amounts (GDAs) system and the traffic light system (TLS). An online randomized controlled trial with 1,932 participants was used to evaluate the effect of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? choices in eight sets of three commercial products, available in the Brazilian marketplace. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the influence of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? likelihood of selecting the different products in the choice task. Results showed that nutritional warnings and the TLS significantly increased the likelihood of selecting none of the products instead of the least healthful product, or a healthier product, in at least one of the product categories compared with the GDA. Warnings tended to have a larger effect, suggesting their potential to encourage healthier food choices.MARCELA DE ALCANTARA, PDJ-CNPQ; GASTÓN ARES, Universidad de la República, Pando, Uruguay; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA.ALCANTARA, M. DEARES, G.DELIZA, R.2022-12-21T13:01:38Z2022-12-21T13:01:38Z2022-12-212022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleFrontiers in Nutrition, v. 9, n. 921515, p. 1-10, 2022.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/115014010.3389/fnut.2022.921515enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2022-12-21T13:01:38Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1150140Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542022-12-21T13:01:38falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542022-12-21T13:01:38Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? |
title |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? |
spellingShingle |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? ALCANTARA, M. DE Nutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choice |
title_short |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? |
title_full |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? |
title_fullStr |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? |
title_sort |
How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? |
author |
ALCANTARA, M. DE |
author_facet |
ALCANTARA, M. DE ARES, G. DELIZA, R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
ARES, G. DELIZA, R. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
MARCELA DE ALCANTARA, PDJ-CNPQ; GASTÓN ARES, Universidad de la República, Pando, Uruguay; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
ALCANTARA, M. DE ARES, G. DELIZA, R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choice |
topic |
Nutritional warning commercial products brand consumers? perception food choice |
description |
A large body of evidence assessing the effectiveness of front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling exists. Most experimental studies have been conducted with fictitious products. However, consumers? perception depends on several products extrinsic factors such as brand. Understanding how strong brand associations influence the effectiveness of FOP nutrition labeling schemes may be crucial to informing policymaking. In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of five different variants of nutritional warnings labels (black magnifier, red magnifier, black octagon, black triangle, and red circle) on consumers? choice of commercial products, compared with two FOP nutrition labeling schemes: the guidelines daily amounts (GDAs) system and the traffic light system (TLS). An online randomized controlled trial with 1,932 participants was used to evaluate the effect of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? choices in eight sets of three commercial products, available in the Brazilian marketplace. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the influence of FOP nutrition labeling on participants? likelihood of selecting the different products in the choice task. Results showed that nutritional warnings and the TLS significantly increased the likelihood of selecting none of the products instead of the least healthful product, or a healthier product, in at least one of the product categories compared with the GDA. Warnings tended to have a larger effect, suggesting their potential to encourage healthier food choices. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-21T13:01:38Z 2022-12-21T13:01:38Z 2022-12-21 2022 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in Nutrition, v. 9, n. 921515, p. 1-10, 2022. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150140 10.3389/fnut.2022.921515 |
identifier_str_mv |
Frontiers in Nutrition, v. 9, n. 921515, p. 1-10, 2022. 10.3389/fnut.2022.921515 |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1150140 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503536427401216 |