Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: BOSI, C., BERNARDI, A. C. de C., MULLER, M. D., OLIVEIRA, P. P. A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1133584
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107350
Resumo: Agroforestry systems, in which trees and crops are cultivated in rotation, succession, or association with pastures, are alternatives for the sustainable implementation of agriculture. This study estimated the productive characteristics from eight years old eucalyptus trees in different agroforestry systems and transmission of photosynthetically active solar radiation (PAR). These were composed of a pasture of palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha 'BRS Piatã') and eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus urograndis 'GG100') planted in April 2011 in single rows 15 m apart with 2 m in-row spacing, totaling 333 trees ha-1. In 2016, half of the trees were thinned, and the spacing was changed to 15 × 4 m. The two systems were then evaluated using an integrated crop-livestock-forestry system (agrosilvopasture with pasture renewal, ICLF) and an integrated livestock-forest system (silvopasture with no pasture renewal, ILF). Each system had 12 paddocks of 5000 m2. In ICLF, pasture was renewed in onethird of each replication of area (two paddocks) per crop year, where the grass was simultaneously sown with corn for silage. Pasture renewal was carried out in the 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018 growing seasons. Data were collected in April 2016 and June 2019, when 110 trees were harvested to determine wood volume and 28 to gather wood rings and samples of the canopy, roots, and carbon content. These data were used to build the equations for estimating stem volume (m3 tree 1) and tree biomass (kg tree - 1). Stem diameter at breast height (DBH, 1.3 m above the ground) and tree height (H) were measured in 10% of the trees in each plot to estimate stem volume and biomass; these were compared by t-test (5%). PAR was measured continuously from 2013 to 2019 at 70 cm aboveground with linear quantum sensors at the four ICLF positions across the tree line. Using these data, equations for volume = exp[(-10.21 + 1.68 × ln(DBH)+1.29 × ln(H)] and biomass = exp[- 3.88 + 2.41*ln(DBH)+0.62 × ln(H)] were built. The stem volume was greater in ICLF (225.7 m3 ha 1) than in ILF (215.2 m3 ha- 1) (p = 0.0369). The total biomass was 148.3 Mg ha 1 for ICLF and 141.0 Mg ha-1 for ILF, with no significant differences between systems. The agroforestry systems accumulated 64.5 Mg ha 1 of carbon in tree biomass by eight years after system implementation. The basal area of trees in both agroforestry systems showed a strong relationship with the transmission of PAR to the pasture.
id EMBR_a788d32bfd14af6dc42333ca88f63ce8
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1133584
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.Sistema agroflorestalSistema ILPFStem volumeILPFEucaliptoÁrvore FlorestalBiomassaBiomassBasal areaCarbonAgroforestry systems, in which trees and crops are cultivated in rotation, succession, or association with pastures, are alternatives for the sustainable implementation of agriculture. This study estimated the productive characteristics from eight years old eucalyptus trees in different agroforestry systems and transmission of photosynthetically active solar radiation (PAR). These were composed of a pasture of palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha 'BRS Piatã') and eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus urograndis 'GG100') planted in April 2011 in single rows 15 m apart with 2 m in-row spacing, totaling 333 trees ha-1. In 2016, half of the trees were thinned, and the spacing was changed to 15 × 4 m. The two systems were then evaluated using an integrated crop-livestock-forestry system (agrosilvopasture with pasture renewal, ICLF) and an integrated livestock-forest system (silvopasture with no pasture renewal, ILF). Each system had 12 paddocks of 5000 m2. In ICLF, pasture was renewed in onethird of each replication of area (two paddocks) per crop year, where the grass was simultaneously sown with corn for silage. Pasture renewal was carried out in the 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018 growing seasons. Data were collected in April 2016 and June 2019, when 110 trees were harvested to determine wood volume and 28 to gather wood rings and samples of the canopy, roots, and carbon content. These data were used to build the equations for estimating stem volume (m3 tree 1) and tree biomass (kg tree - 1). Stem diameter at breast height (DBH, 1.3 m above the ground) and tree height (H) were measured in 10% of the trees in each plot to estimate stem volume and biomass; these were compared by t-test (5%). PAR was measured continuously from 2013 to 2019 at 70 cm aboveground with linear quantum sensors at the four ICLF positions across the tree line. Using these data, equations for volume = exp[(-10.21 + 1.68 × ln(DBH)+1.29 × ln(H)] and biomass = exp[- 3.88 + 2.41*ln(DBH)+0.62 × ln(H)] were built. The stem volume was greater in ICLF (225.7 m3 ha 1) than in ILF (215.2 m3 ha- 1) (p = 0.0369). The total biomass was 148.3 Mg ha 1 for ICLF and 141.0 Mg ha-1 for ILF, with no significant differences between systems. The agroforestry systems accumulated 64.5 Mg ha 1 of carbon in tree biomass by eight years after system implementation. The basal area of trees in both agroforestry systems showed a strong relationship with the transmission of PAR to the pasture.JOSE RICARDO MACEDO PEZZOPANE, CPPSE; CRISTIAM BOSI, CNPQ; ALBERTO CARLOS DE CAMPOS BERNARDI, CPPSE; MARCELO DIAS MULLER, CNPGL; PATRICIA PERONDI ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, CPPSE.PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.BOSI, C.BERNARDI, A. C. de C.MULLER, M. D.OLIVEIRA, P. P. A.2021-08-16T12:05:04Z2021-08-16T12:05:04Z2021-08-162021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.312, jun. 2021, 107350.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1133584https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107350enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2021-08-16T12:05:13Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1133584Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542021-08-16T12:05:13Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.
title Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.
spellingShingle Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.
PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
Sistema agroflorestal
Sistema ILPF
Stem volume
ILPF
Eucalipto
Árvore Florestal
Biomassa
Biomass
Basal area
Carbon
title_short Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.
title_full Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.
title_fullStr Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.
title_full_unstemmed Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.
title_sort Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: productivity parameters and PAR transmittance.
author PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
author_facet PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
BOSI, C.
BERNARDI, A. C. de C.
MULLER, M. D.
OLIVEIRA, P. P. A.
author_role author
author2 BOSI, C.
BERNARDI, A. C. de C.
MULLER, M. D.
OLIVEIRA, P. P. A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv JOSE RICARDO MACEDO PEZZOPANE, CPPSE; CRISTIAM BOSI, CNPQ; ALBERTO CARLOS DE CAMPOS BERNARDI, CPPSE; MARCELO DIAS MULLER, CNPGL; PATRICIA PERONDI ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, CPPSE.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PEZZOPANE, J. R. M.
BOSI, C.
BERNARDI, A. C. de C.
MULLER, M. D.
OLIVEIRA, P. P. A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sistema agroflorestal
Sistema ILPF
Stem volume
ILPF
Eucalipto
Árvore Florestal
Biomassa
Biomass
Basal area
Carbon
topic Sistema agroflorestal
Sistema ILPF
Stem volume
ILPF
Eucalipto
Árvore Florestal
Biomassa
Biomass
Basal area
Carbon
description Agroforestry systems, in which trees and crops are cultivated in rotation, succession, or association with pastures, are alternatives for the sustainable implementation of agriculture. This study estimated the productive characteristics from eight years old eucalyptus trees in different agroforestry systems and transmission of photosynthetically active solar radiation (PAR). These were composed of a pasture of palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha 'BRS Piatã') and eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus urograndis 'GG100') planted in April 2011 in single rows 15 m apart with 2 m in-row spacing, totaling 333 trees ha-1. In 2016, half of the trees were thinned, and the spacing was changed to 15 × 4 m. The two systems were then evaluated using an integrated crop-livestock-forestry system (agrosilvopasture with pasture renewal, ICLF) and an integrated livestock-forest system (silvopasture with no pasture renewal, ILF). Each system had 12 paddocks of 5000 m2. In ICLF, pasture was renewed in onethird of each replication of area (two paddocks) per crop year, where the grass was simultaneously sown with corn for silage. Pasture renewal was carried out in the 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018 growing seasons. Data were collected in April 2016 and June 2019, when 110 trees were harvested to determine wood volume and 28 to gather wood rings and samples of the canopy, roots, and carbon content. These data were used to build the equations for estimating stem volume (m3 tree 1) and tree biomass (kg tree - 1). Stem diameter at breast height (DBH, 1.3 m above the ground) and tree height (H) were measured in 10% of the trees in each plot to estimate stem volume and biomass; these were compared by t-test (5%). PAR was measured continuously from 2013 to 2019 at 70 cm aboveground with linear quantum sensors at the four ICLF positions across the tree line. Using these data, equations for volume = exp[(-10.21 + 1.68 × ln(DBH)+1.29 × ln(H)] and biomass = exp[- 3.88 + 2.41*ln(DBH)+0.62 × ln(H)] were built. The stem volume was greater in ICLF (225.7 m3 ha 1) than in ILF (215.2 m3 ha- 1) (p = 0.0369). The total biomass was 148.3 Mg ha 1 for ICLF and 141.0 Mg ha-1 for ILF, with no significant differences between systems. The agroforestry systems accumulated 64.5 Mg ha 1 of carbon in tree biomass by eight years after system implementation. The basal area of trees in both agroforestry systems showed a strong relationship with the transmission of PAR to the pasture.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-16T12:05:04Z
2021-08-16T12:05:04Z
2021-08-16
2021
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.312, jun. 2021, 107350.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1133584
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107350
identifier_str_mv Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.312, jun. 2021, 107350.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1133584
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107350
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1817695615205769216