Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: BOULAY, A. M.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: DRASTIG, K., AMANULLAH, CHAPAGAIN, A., CHARLON, V., CIVIT, B., CAMILLIS, C. DE, SOUZA, M. DE, HESS, T., HOEKSTRA, A. Y., IBIDHI, R., LATHUILLIERE, M. J., MANZARDO, A., MCALLISTER, T., MORALES, R. A., MOTOSHITA, M., PALHARES, J. C. P., PIRLO, G., RIDOUTT, B., RUSSO, V., SALMORAL, G., SINGH, R., VANHAM, D., WIEDEMANN, S., ZHENG, W., PFISTER, S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1137681
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391
Resumo: The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.
id EMBR_b72a337f2ea21e0c1e329c8d4ec126b1
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1137681
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.Water footprintingWater productivityWater scarcity footprintWater use assessmentLivestock productionThe FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.ANNE-MARIE BOULAY, Sherbrooke University; KATRIN DRASTIG, Polytechnique Montreal; AMANULLAH, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences; ASHOK CHAPAGAIN, Pacific Institute, USA; VERONICA CHARLON, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); BÁRBARA CIVIT, INAHE CONICET and UTN FRM Mendoza; CAMILLO DE CAMILLIS, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); MARLOS DE SOUZA, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); TIM HESS, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; ARJEN Y. HOEKSTRA, Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; RIDHA IBIDHI, Department of Animal and Forage Production, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Ariana, Tunisia; MICHAEL J. LATHUILLIÈRE, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; ALESSANDRO MANZARDO, CESQA, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; TIM MCALLISTER, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada; RICARDO A. MORALES, AgroDer SC, Mexico DF, Mexico; MASAHARU MOTOSHITA, Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; GIACOMO PIRLO, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Lodi, Italy; BRAD RIDOUTT, Department Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa; VALENTINA RUSSO, Environmental and Process Systems Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa; GLORIA SALMORAL, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; RANVIR SINGH, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; DAVY VANHAM, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy; STEPHEN WIEDEMANN, Integrity Ag and Environment, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia; WEICHAO ZHENG, China Agricultural University, China; STEPHAN PFISTER, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH-Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.BOULAY, A. M.DRASTIG, K.AMANULLAHCHAPAGAIN, A.CHARLON, V.CIVIT, B.CAMILLIS, C. DESOUZA, M. DEHESS, T.HOEKSTRA, A. Y.IBIDHI, R.LATHUILLIERE, M. J.MANZARDO, A.MCALLISTER, T.MORALES, R. A.MOTOSHITA, M.PALHARES, J. C. P.PIRLO, G.RIDOUTT, B.RUSSO, V.SALMORAL, G.SINGH, R.VANHAM, D.WIEDEMANN, S.ZHENG, W.PFISTER, S.2021-12-13T18:01:21Z2021-12-13T18:01:21Z2021-12-132021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article11 p.Ecological Indicators, v.124, may 2021, 107391.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1137681https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2021-12-13T18:01:31Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1137681Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542021-12-13T18:01:31falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542021-12-13T18:01:31Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.
title Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.
spellingShingle Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.
BOULAY, A. M.
Water footprinting
Water productivity
Water scarcity footprint
Water use assessment
Livestock production
title_short Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.
title_full Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.
title_fullStr Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.
title_full_unstemmed Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.
title_sort Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.
author BOULAY, A. M.
author_facet BOULAY, A. M.
DRASTIG, K.
AMANULLAH
CHAPAGAIN, A.
CHARLON, V.
CIVIT, B.
CAMILLIS, C. DE
SOUZA, M. DE
HESS, T.
HOEKSTRA, A. Y.
IBIDHI, R.
LATHUILLIERE, M. J.
MANZARDO, A.
MCALLISTER, T.
MORALES, R. A.
MOTOSHITA, M.
PALHARES, J. C. P.
PIRLO, G.
RIDOUTT, B.
RUSSO, V.
SALMORAL, G.
SINGH, R.
VANHAM, D.
WIEDEMANN, S.
ZHENG, W.
PFISTER, S.
author_role author
author2 DRASTIG, K.
AMANULLAH
CHAPAGAIN, A.
CHARLON, V.
CIVIT, B.
CAMILLIS, C. DE
SOUZA, M. DE
HESS, T.
HOEKSTRA, A. Y.
IBIDHI, R.
LATHUILLIERE, M. J.
MANZARDO, A.
MCALLISTER, T.
MORALES, R. A.
MOTOSHITA, M.
PALHARES, J. C. P.
PIRLO, G.
RIDOUTT, B.
RUSSO, V.
SALMORAL, G.
SINGH, R.
VANHAM, D.
WIEDEMANN, S.
ZHENG, W.
PFISTER, S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv ANNE-MARIE BOULAY, Sherbrooke University; KATRIN DRASTIG, Polytechnique Montreal; AMANULLAH, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences; ASHOK CHAPAGAIN, Pacific Institute, USA; VERONICA CHARLON, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); BÁRBARA CIVIT, INAHE CONICET and UTN FRM Mendoza; CAMILLO DE CAMILLIS, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); MARLOS DE SOUZA, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); TIM HESS, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; ARJEN Y. HOEKSTRA, Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; RIDHA IBIDHI, Department of Animal and Forage Production, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Ariana, Tunisia; MICHAEL J. LATHUILLIÈRE, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; ALESSANDRO MANZARDO, CESQA, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; TIM MCALLISTER, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada; RICARDO A. MORALES, AgroDer SC, Mexico DF, Mexico; MASAHARU MOTOSHITA, Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; GIACOMO PIRLO, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Lodi, Italy; BRAD RIDOUTT, Department Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa; VALENTINA RUSSO, Environmental and Process Systems Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa; GLORIA SALMORAL, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; RANVIR SINGH, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; DAVY VANHAM, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy; STEPHEN WIEDEMANN, Integrity Ag and Environment, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia; WEICHAO ZHENG, China Agricultural University, China; STEPHAN PFISTER, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH-Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv BOULAY, A. M.
DRASTIG, K.
AMANULLAH
CHAPAGAIN, A.
CHARLON, V.
CIVIT, B.
CAMILLIS, C. DE
SOUZA, M. DE
HESS, T.
HOEKSTRA, A. Y.
IBIDHI, R.
LATHUILLIERE, M. J.
MANZARDO, A.
MCALLISTER, T.
MORALES, R. A.
MOTOSHITA, M.
PALHARES, J. C. P.
PIRLO, G.
RIDOUTT, B.
RUSSO, V.
SALMORAL, G.
SINGH, R.
VANHAM, D.
WIEDEMANN, S.
ZHENG, W.
PFISTER, S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Water footprinting
Water productivity
Water scarcity footprint
Water use assessment
Livestock production
topic Water footprinting
Water productivity
Water scarcity footprint
Water use assessment
Livestock production
description The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-13T18:01:21Z
2021-12-13T18:01:21Z
2021-12-13
2021
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Ecological Indicators, v.124, may 2021, 107391.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1137681
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391
identifier_str_mv Ecological Indicators, v.124, may 2021, 107391.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1137681
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 11 p.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503514536280064