Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: KULMANN, M. S. de S.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: SETE, P. B., PAULA, B. V. de, STEFANELLO, L. O., SCHWALBERT, R., SCHWALBERT, R. A., ARRUDA, W. S., SANS, G. A., PARCIANELLO, C. F., NICOLOSO, F. T., MELO, G. W. B. de, SANTOS, H. P. dos, BRUNETTO, G.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128996
Resumo: Grapevine rootstocks are selected according to graft compatibility, pathogen tolerance and water stress. However, morphological and kinetic parameters of nutrient absorption, such as nitrate (NO3 −) and ammonium (NH4 +), usually are not considered. The study aimed to select, based on morphological and kinetic absorption parameters, grapevine rootstocks with greater efficiency of N-forms absorption. The study was performed with two grapevine rootstocks (?Paulsen 1103? and ?Magnolia?), grown in Hoagland nutrient solution in a greenhouse. After 21 d, they were placed in 0.05 mol L-1 CaSO4 solution for 20 d to exhaust nutrient internal reserves. The rootstock with highest NO3 − and NH4 + uptake efficiency was ?Paulsen 1103?, since it presented lower Cmin and Km values in the two N forms, allowing N extraction by roots, even in low concentrations in solution, due to the higher transporter affinity for NO3 − and NH4 + in roots from rootstock. ?Paulsen 1103? rootstock also presented better photosynthetic performance and root development, collaborating for greater growth and mass production than 'Magnolia' rootstock. On the other hand, ?Magnolia? rootstock showed higher NO3 − and NH4 + Cmin and Km values than ?Paulsen? rootstock, which shows lower transporters affinity for these ions. Results demonstrate the importance of the use of NO3 − and NH4 + uptake kinetic parameters in grapevine rootstock selection programs, since these may serve as indicator of plant's ability to absorb NO3 − and NH4 + in low concentrations.
id EMBR_bffa7e1259dc3aa8d60da9dd888cec1b
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1128996
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.CminNitrogen uptake efficiencyRootstock selectionInfluxNO3 and NH4Km and VmaxGrapevine rootstocks are selected according to graft compatibility, pathogen tolerance and water stress. However, morphological and kinetic parameters of nutrient absorption, such as nitrate (NO3 −) and ammonium (NH4 +), usually are not considered. The study aimed to select, based on morphological and kinetic absorption parameters, grapevine rootstocks with greater efficiency of N-forms absorption. The study was performed with two grapevine rootstocks (?Paulsen 1103? and ?Magnolia?), grown in Hoagland nutrient solution in a greenhouse. After 21 d, they were placed in 0.05 mol L-1 CaSO4 solution for 20 d to exhaust nutrient internal reserves. The rootstock with highest NO3 − and NH4 + uptake efficiency was ?Paulsen 1103?, since it presented lower Cmin and Km values in the two N forms, allowing N extraction by roots, even in low concentrations in solution, due to the higher transporter affinity for NO3 − and NH4 + in roots from rootstock. ?Paulsen 1103? rootstock also presented better photosynthetic performance and root development, collaborating for greater growth and mass production than 'Magnolia' rootstock. On the other hand, ?Magnolia? rootstock showed higher NO3 − and NH4 + Cmin and Km values than ?Paulsen? rootstock, which shows lower transporters affinity for these ions. Results demonstrate the importance of the use of NO3 − and NH4 + uptake kinetic parameters in grapevine rootstock selection programs, since these may serve as indicator of plant's ability to absorb NO3 − and NH4 + in low concentrations.MATHEUS SEVERO DE SOUZA KULMANN, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; PAULA BEATRIZ SETE, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Rodovia Admar Gonzaga, 1346, CEP 88034-001, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil; BETANIA VAHL DE PAULA, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; LINCON OLIVEIRA STEFANELLO, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; RAÍSSA SCHWALBERT, Agronomy Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; RAÍ AUGUSTO SCHWALBERT, Agronomy Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; WAGNER SQUIZANI ARRUDA, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; GABRIEL ALBERTO SANS, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; CAROLINA FLOGIARINI PARCIANELLO, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; FERNANDO TEIXEIRA NICOLOSO, Agronomy Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; GEORGE WELLINGTON BASTOS DE MELO, CNPUV; HENRIQUE PESSOA DOS SANTOS, CNPUV; GUSTAVO BRUNETTO, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.KULMANN, M. S. de S.SETE, P. B.PAULA, B. V. deSTEFANELLO, L. O.SCHWALBERT, R.SCHWALBERT, R. A.ARRUDA, W. S.SANS, G. A.PARCIANELLO, C. F.NICOLOSO, F. T.MELO, G. W. B. deSANTOS, H. P. dosBRUNETTO, G.2021-01-07T09:02:54Z2021-01-07T09:02:54Z2021-01-062020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleScientia Horticulturae, v. 264, article 109174, 2020.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/112899610.1016/j.scienta.2020.109174enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2021-01-07T09:03:01Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1128996Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542021-01-07T09:03:01falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542021-01-07T09:03:01Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.
title Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.
spellingShingle Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.
KULMANN, M. S. de S.
Cmin
Nitrogen uptake efficiency
Rootstock selection
Influx
NO3 and NH4
Km and Vmax
title_short Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.
title_full Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.
title_fullStr Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.
title_full_unstemmed Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.
title_sort Kinetic parameters govern of the uptake of nitrogen forms in "Paulsen" and "Magnolia" grapevine rootstocks.
author KULMANN, M. S. de S.
author_facet KULMANN, M. S. de S.
SETE, P. B.
PAULA, B. V. de
STEFANELLO, L. O.
SCHWALBERT, R.
SCHWALBERT, R. A.
ARRUDA, W. S.
SANS, G. A.
PARCIANELLO, C. F.
NICOLOSO, F. T.
MELO, G. W. B. de
SANTOS, H. P. dos
BRUNETTO, G.
author_role author
author2 SETE, P. B.
PAULA, B. V. de
STEFANELLO, L. O.
SCHWALBERT, R.
SCHWALBERT, R. A.
ARRUDA, W. S.
SANS, G. A.
PARCIANELLO, C. F.
NICOLOSO, F. T.
MELO, G. W. B. de
SANTOS, H. P. dos
BRUNETTO, G.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv MATHEUS SEVERO DE SOUZA KULMANN, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; PAULA BEATRIZ SETE, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Rodovia Admar Gonzaga, 1346, CEP 88034-001, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil; BETANIA VAHL DE PAULA, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; LINCON OLIVEIRA STEFANELLO, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; RAÍSSA SCHWALBERT, Agronomy Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; RAÍ AUGUSTO SCHWALBERT, Agronomy Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; WAGNER SQUIZANI ARRUDA, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; GABRIEL ALBERTO SANS, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; CAROLINA FLOGIARINI PARCIANELLO, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; FERNANDO TEIXEIRA NICOLOSO, Agronomy Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil; GEORGE WELLINGTON BASTOS DE MELO, CNPUV; HENRIQUE PESSOA DOS SANTOS, CNPUV; GUSTAVO BRUNETTO, Soil Science Department of Federal, University of Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv KULMANN, M. S. de S.
SETE, P. B.
PAULA, B. V. de
STEFANELLO, L. O.
SCHWALBERT, R.
SCHWALBERT, R. A.
ARRUDA, W. S.
SANS, G. A.
PARCIANELLO, C. F.
NICOLOSO, F. T.
MELO, G. W. B. de
SANTOS, H. P. dos
BRUNETTO, G.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cmin
Nitrogen uptake efficiency
Rootstock selection
Influx
NO3 and NH4
Km and Vmax
topic Cmin
Nitrogen uptake efficiency
Rootstock selection
Influx
NO3 and NH4
Km and Vmax
description Grapevine rootstocks are selected according to graft compatibility, pathogen tolerance and water stress. However, morphological and kinetic parameters of nutrient absorption, such as nitrate (NO3 −) and ammonium (NH4 +), usually are not considered. The study aimed to select, based on morphological and kinetic absorption parameters, grapevine rootstocks with greater efficiency of N-forms absorption. The study was performed with two grapevine rootstocks (?Paulsen 1103? and ?Magnolia?), grown in Hoagland nutrient solution in a greenhouse. After 21 d, they were placed in 0.05 mol L-1 CaSO4 solution for 20 d to exhaust nutrient internal reserves. The rootstock with highest NO3 − and NH4 + uptake efficiency was ?Paulsen 1103?, since it presented lower Cmin and Km values in the two N forms, allowing N extraction by roots, even in low concentrations in solution, due to the higher transporter affinity for NO3 − and NH4 + in roots from rootstock. ?Paulsen 1103? rootstock also presented better photosynthetic performance and root development, collaborating for greater growth and mass production than 'Magnolia' rootstock. On the other hand, ?Magnolia? rootstock showed higher NO3 − and NH4 + Cmin and Km values than ?Paulsen? rootstock, which shows lower transporters affinity for these ions. Results demonstrate the importance of the use of NO3 − and NH4 + uptake kinetic parameters in grapevine rootstock selection programs, since these may serve as indicator of plant's ability to absorb NO3 − and NH4 + in low concentrations.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2021-01-07T09:02:54Z
2021-01-07T09:02:54Z
2021-01-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae, v. 264, article 109174, 2020.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128996
10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109174
identifier_str_mv Scientia Horticulturae, v. 264, article 109174, 2020.
10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109174
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1128996
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503500750651392