Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: HUNTER, M. O.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: KELLE, M., MORTON, D., COOK, B., LEFSKY, M., DUCEY, M., SALESKA, S., OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de, SCHIETTI, J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1020660
Resumo: Gap phase dynamics are the dominant mode of forest turnover in tropical forests. However, gap processes are infrequently studied at the landscape scale. Airborne lidar data offer detailed information on three-dimensional forest structure, providing a means to characterize fine-scale (1 m) processes in tropical forests over large areas. Lidar-based estimates of forest structure (top down) differ from traditional field measurements (bottom up), and necessitate clear-cut definitions unencumbered by the wisdom of a field observer.We offer a new definition of a forest gap that is driven by forest dynamics and consistent with precise ranging measurements from airborne lidar data and tall, multi-layered tropical forest structure. We used 1000 ha of multi-temporal lidar data (2008, 2012) at two sites, the Tapajos National Forest and Ducke Reserve, to study gap dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon. Here, we identified dynamic gaps as contiguous areas of significant growth, that correspond to areas > 10 m2, with height <10 m. Applying the dynamic definition at both sites, we found over twice as much area in gap at Tapajos National Forest (4.8 %) as compared to Ducke Reserve (2.0 %). On average, gaps were smaller at Ducke Reserve and closed slightly more rapidly, with estimated height gains of 1.2 m y-1 versus 1.1 m y-1 at Tapajos. At the Tapajos site, height growth in gap centers was greater than the average height gain in gaps (1.3 m y-1 versus 1.1 m y-1). Rates of height growth between lidar acquisitions reflect the interplay between gap edge mortality, horizontal ingrowth and gap size at the two sites. We estimated that approximately 10%of gap area closed via horizontal ingrowth at Ducke Reserve as opposed to 6 %at Tapajos National Forest. Height loss (interpreted as repeat damage and/or mortality) and horizontal ingrowth accounted for similar proportions of gap area at Ducke Reserve (13% and 10 %, respectively). At Tapajos, height loss had a much stronger signal (23 %versus 6 %) within gaps. Both sites demonstrate limited gap contagiousness defined by an increase in the likelihood of mortality in the immediate vicinity (~6 m) of existing gaps.
id EMBR_c07b77f69609da0fda346d58d12bd083
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1020660
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.Landscape scaleTropical forestsGap phase dynamics are the dominant mode of forest turnover in tropical forests. However, gap processes are infrequently studied at the landscape scale. Airborne lidar data offer detailed information on three-dimensional forest structure, providing a means to characterize fine-scale (1 m) processes in tropical forests over large areas. Lidar-based estimates of forest structure (top down) differ from traditional field measurements (bottom up), and necessitate clear-cut definitions unencumbered by the wisdom of a field observer.We offer a new definition of a forest gap that is driven by forest dynamics and consistent with precise ranging measurements from airborne lidar data and tall, multi-layered tropical forest structure. We used 1000 ha of multi-temporal lidar data (2008, 2012) at two sites, the Tapajos National Forest and Ducke Reserve, to study gap dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon. Here, we identified dynamic gaps as contiguous areas of significant growth, that correspond to areas > 10 m2, with height <10 m. Applying the dynamic definition at both sites, we found over twice as much area in gap at Tapajos National Forest (4.8 %) as compared to Ducke Reserve (2.0 %). On average, gaps were smaller at Ducke Reserve and closed slightly more rapidly, with estimated height gains of 1.2 m y-1 versus 1.1 m y-1 at Tapajos. At the Tapajos site, height growth in gap centers was greater than the average height gain in gaps (1.3 m y-1 versus 1.1 m y-1). Rates of height growth between lidar acquisitions reflect the interplay between gap edge mortality, horizontal ingrowth and gap size at the two sites. We estimated that approximately 10%of gap area closed via horizontal ingrowth at Ducke Reserve as opposed to 6 %at Tapajos National Forest. Height loss (interpreted as repeat damage and/or mortality) and horizontal ingrowth accounted for similar proportions of gap area at Ducke Reserve (13% and 10 %, respectively). At Tapajos, height loss had a much stronger signal (23 %versus 6 %) within gaps. Both sites demonstrate limited gap contagiousness defined by an increase in the likelihood of mortality in the immediate vicinity (~6 m) of existing gaps.MARIA O. HUNTER, UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE; MICHAEL KELLER, USDA/PESQUISADOR VISITANTE CNPM; DOUGLAS MORTON, NASA; BRUCE COOK, NASA; MICHAEL LEFSKY, COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY; MARK DUCEY, UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE; SCOTT SALESKA, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA; RAIMUNDO COSME DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPATU; JULIANA SCHIETTI, INPA.HUNTER, M. O.KELLE, M.MORTON, D.COOK, B.LEFSKY, M.DUCEY, M.SALESKA, S.OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. deSCHIETTI, J.2015-07-28T11:11:11Z2015-07-28T11:11:11Z2015-07-2820152015-07-28T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlePlos One, v. 10, n.7, p. 1-19, jul. 2015.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/102066010.1371/journal.pone.0132144porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T02:27:45Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1020660Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T02:27:45Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.
title Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.
spellingShingle Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.
HUNTER, M. O.
Landscape scale
Tropical forests
title_short Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.
title_full Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.
title_fullStr Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.
title_full_unstemmed Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.
title_sort Structural dynamics of tropical moist forest gaps.
author HUNTER, M. O.
author_facet HUNTER, M. O.
KELLE, M.
MORTON, D.
COOK, B.
LEFSKY, M.
DUCEY, M.
SALESKA, S.
OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de
SCHIETTI, J.
author_role author
author2 KELLE, M.
MORTON, D.
COOK, B.
LEFSKY, M.
DUCEY, M.
SALESKA, S.
OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de
SCHIETTI, J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv MARIA O. HUNTER, UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE; MICHAEL KELLER, USDA/PESQUISADOR VISITANTE CNPM; DOUGLAS MORTON, NASA; BRUCE COOK, NASA; MICHAEL LEFSKY, COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY; MARK DUCEY, UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE; SCOTT SALESKA, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA; RAIMUNDO COSME DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPATU; JULIANA SCHIETTI, INPA.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv HUNTER, M. O.
KELLE, M.
MORTON, D.
COOK, B.
LEFSKY, M.
DUCEY, M.
SALESKA, S.
OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de
SCHIETTI, J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Landscape scale
Tropical forests
topic Landscape scale
Tropical forests
description Gap phase dynamics are the dominant mode of forest turnover in tropical forests. However, gap processes are infrequently studied at the landscape scale. Airborne lidar data offer detailed information on three-dimensional forest structure, providing a means to characterize fine-scale (1 m) processes in tropical forests over large areas. Lidar-based estimates of forest structure (top down) differ from traditional field measurements (bottom up), and necessitate clear-cut definitions unencumbered by the wisdom of a field observer.We offer a new definition of a forest gap that is driven by forest dynamics and consistent with precise ranging measurements from airborne lidar data and tall, multi-layered tropical forest structure. We used 1000 ha of multi-temporal lidar data (2008, 2012) at two sites, the Tapajos National Forest and Ducke Reserve, to study gap dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon. Here, we identified dynamic gaps as contiguous areas of significant growth, that correspond to areas > 10 m2, with height <10 m. Applying the dynamic definition at both sites, we found over twice as much area in gap at Tapajos National Forest (4.8 %) as compared to Ducke Reserve (2.0 %). On average, gaps were smaller at Ducke Reserve and closed slightly more rapidly, with estimated height gains of 1.2 m y-1 versus 1.1 m y-1 at Tapajos. At the Tapajos site, height growth in gap centers was greater than the average height gain in gaps (1.3 m y-1 versus 1.1 m y-1). Rates of height growth between lidar acquisitions reflect the interplay between gap edge mortality, horizontal ingrowth and gap size at the two sites. We estimated that approximately 10%of gap area closed via horizontal ingrowth at Ducke Reserve as opposed to 6 %at Tapajos National Forest. Height loss (interpreted as repeat damage and/or mortality) and horizontal ingrowth accounted for similar proportions of gap area at Ducke Reserve (13% and 10 %, respectively). At Tapajos, height loss had a much stronger signal (23 %versus 6 %) within gaps. Both sites demonstrate limited gap contagiousness defined by an increase in the likelihood of mortality in the immediate vicinity (~6 m) of existing gaps.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-28T11:11:11Z
2015-07-28T11:11:11Z
2015-07-28
2015
2015-07-28T11:11:11Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Plos One, v. 10, n.7, p. 1-19, jul. 2015.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1020660
10.1371/journal.pone.0132144
identifier_str_mv Plos One, v. 10, n.7, p. 1-19, jul. 2015.
10.1371/journal.pone.0132144
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1020660
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1817695388722790400