Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/970661 |
Resumo: | Soil Health refers to the ecological equilibrium and the functionality of a soil and its capacity to maintain a well balanced ecosystem with high biodiversity above and below surface, and productivity. To understand and use soil health as a tool for sustainability, physical, chemical, and biological properties must be employed to verify which respond to the soil use and management within a desired timescale. Attributes with a rapid response to natural or anthropogenic actions are considered good indicators of soil health. Among the physical indicators, soil texture, aggregation, moisture, porosity, and bulk density have been used, while among chemical indicators total C and N, mineral nutrients, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, among others are well established. However, most of them generally have a slow response, when compared to the biological ones, such as microbial biomass C and N, biodiversity, soil enzymes, soil respiration, etc., in addition to macro and mesofauna. Thus, a systemic approach based on different kinds of indicators (physical, chemical and biological) in assessing soil health would be safer than using only one kind of attribute. Many human activities have caused desertification, loss of biodiversity, disruption of aggregates, loss of organic matter and nutrients, among others. Today, it is imperious to maintain soil health and productivity with increasing emphasis on reforestation and recuperation of degraded areas through the use of organic amendments, reintroduction of plants, soil fauna and microorganisms. This review focused on an integrative view on indicators of soil health to be used as tools for prediction of sustainability in production systems. |
id |
EMBR_c434af57b0f6cbbe575985cc43dfac25 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/970661 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health?Saúde do soloSoil Health refers to the ecological equilibrium and the functionality of a soil and its capacity to maintain a well balanced ecosystem with high biodiversity above and below surface, and productivity. To understand and use soil health as a tool for sustainability, physical, chemical, and biological properties must be employed to verify which respond to the soil use and management within a desired timescale. Attributes with a rapid response to natural or anthropogenic actions are considered good indicators of soil health. Among the physical indicators, soil texture, aggregation, moisture, porosity, and bulk density have been used, while among chemical indicators total C and N, mineral nutrients, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, among others are well established. However, most of them generally have a slow response, when compared to the biological ones, such as microbial biomass C and N, biodiversity, soil enzymes, soil respiration, etc., in addition to macro and mesofauna. Thus, a systemic approach based on different kinds of indicators (physical, chemical and biological) in assessing soil health would be safer than using only one kind of attribute. Many human activities have caused desertification, loss of biodiversity, disruption of aggregates, loss of organic matter and nutrients, among others. Today, it is imperious to maintain soil health and productivity with increasing emphasis on reforestation and recuperation of degraded areas through the use of organic amendments, reintroduction of plants, soil fauna and microorganisms. This review focused on an integrative view on indicators of soil health to be used as tools for prediction of sustainability in production systems.ELKE JURANDY BRAN NOGUEIRA CARDOSO, USP/ESALQ; RAFAEL LEANDRO FIGUEIREDO VASCONCELLOS, USP/ESALQ; DANIEL BINI, USP/ESALQ; MARINA YUMI HORTA MIYAUCHI, USP/ESALQ; CRISTIANE ALCANTARA DOS SANTOS, USP/ESALQ; PAULO ROGER LOPES ALVES, USP/ESALQ; ALESSANDRA MONTEIRO DE PAULA, UFPR; ANDRÉ SHIGUEYOSHI NAKATANI, USP/ESALQ; JAMIL DE MORAES PEREIRA, USP/ESALQ; MARCO ANTONIO NOGUEIRA, CNPSO.CARDOSO, E. J. B. N.VASCONCELLOS, R. L. F.BINI, D.MIYAUCHI, M. Y. H.SANTOS, C. A. dosALVES, P. R. L.PAULA, A. M. deNAKATANI, A. S.PEREIRA, J. de M.NOGUEIRA, M. A.2013-11-07T11:11:11Z2013-11-07T11:11:11Z2013-11-0720132013-12-02T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleScientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 70, n. 4, p. 274-289, July/Aug. 2013.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/97066110.1590/S0103-90162013000400009enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T00:33:44Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/970661Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T00:33:44falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T00:33:44Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? |
title |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? |
spellingShingle |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? CARDOSO, E. J. B. N. Saúde do solo |
title_short |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? |
title_full |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? |
title_fullStr |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? |
title_sort |
Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? |
author |
CARDOSO, E. J. B. N. |
author_facet |
CARDOSO, E. J. B. N. VASCONCELLOS, R. L. F. BINI, D. MIYAUCHI, M. Y. H. SANTOS, C. A. dos ALVES, P. R. L. PAULA, A. M. de NAKATANI, A. S. PEREIRA, J. de M. NOGUEIRA, M. A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
VASCONCELLOS, R. L. F. BINI, D. MIYAUCHI, M. Y. H. SANTOS, C. A. dos ALVES, P. R. L. PAULA, A. M. de NAKATANI, A. S. PEREIRA, J. de M. NOGUEIRA, M. A. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
ELKE JURANDY BRAN NOGUEIRA CARDOSO, USP/ESALQ; RAFAEL LEANDRO FIGUEIREDO VASCONCELLOS, USP/ESALQ; DANIEL BINI, USP/ESALQ; MARINA YUMI HORTA MIYAUCHI, USP/ESALQ; CRISTIANE ALCANTARA DOS SANTOS, USP/ESALQ; PAULO ROGER LOPES ALVES, USP/ESALQ; ALESSANDRA MONTEIRO DE PAULA, UFPR; ANDRÉ SHIGUEYOSHI NAKATANI, USP/ESALQ; JAMIL DE MORAES PEREIRA, USP/ESALQ; MARCO ANTONIO NOGUEIRA, CNPSO. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
CARDOSO, E. J. B. N. VASCONCELLOS, R. L. F. BINI, D. MIYAUCHI, M. Y. H. SANTOS, C. A. dos ALVES, P. R. L. PAULA, A. M. de NAKATANI, A. S. PEREIRA, J. de M. NOGUEIRA, M. A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Saúde do solo |
topic |
Saúde do solo |
description |
Soil Health refers to the ecological equilibrium and the functionality of a soil and its capacity to maintain a well balanced ecosystem with high biodiversity above and below surface, and productivity. To understand and use soil health as a tool for sustainability, physical, chemical, and biological properties must be employed to verify which respond to the soil use and management within a desired timescale. Attributes with a rapid response to natural or anthropogenic actions are considered good indicators of soil health. Among the physical indicators, soil texture, aggregation, moisture, porosity, and bulk density have been used, while among chemical indicators total C and N, mineral nutrients, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, among others are well established. However, most of them generally have a slow response, when compared to the biological ones, such as microbial biomass C and N, biodiversity, soil enzymes, soil respiration, etc., in addition to macro and mesofauna. Thus, a systemic approach based on different kinds of indicators (physical, chemical and biological) in assessing soil health would be safer than using only one kind of attribute. Many human activities have caused desertification, loss of biodiversity, disruption of aggregates, loss of organic matter and nutrients, among others. Today, it is imperious to maintain soil health and productivity with increasing emphasis on reforestation and recuperation of degraded areas through the use of organic amendments, reintroduction of plants, soil fauna and microorganisms. This review focused on an integrative view on indicators of soil health to be used as tools for prediction of sustainability in production systems. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-11-07T11:11:11Z 2013-11-07T11:11:11Z 2013-11-07 2013 2013-12-02T11:11:11Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 70, n. 4, p. 274-289, July/Aug. 2013. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/970661 10.1590/S0103-90162013000400009 |
identifier_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola, Piracicaba, v. 70, n. 4, p. 274-289, July/Aug. 2013. 10.1590/S0103-90162013000400009 |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/970661 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503383094132736 |