Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: HEINEMANN, A. B.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: RAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, J., SOUZA, T. L. P. O., DIDONET, A. D., DI STEFANO, J. G., BOOTE, K. J., JARVIS, A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1046621
Resumo: Common bean production in Goiás, Brazil is concentrated in the same geographic area, but spread acrossthree distinct growing seasons, namely, wet, dry and winter. In the wet and dry seasons, common beansare grown under rainfed conditions, whereas the winter sowing is fully irrigated. The conventional breed-ing program performs all varietal selection stages solely in the winter season, with rainfed environmentsbeing incorporated in the breeding scheme only through the multi environment trials (METs) wherebasically only yield is recorded. As yield is the result of many interacting processes, it is challengingto determine the events (abiotic or biotic) associated with yield reduction in the rainfed environments(wet and dry seasons). To improve our understanding of rainfed dry bean production so as to produceinformation that can assist breeders in their efforts to develop stress-tolerant, high-yielding germplasm,we characterized environments by integrating weather, soil, crop and management factors using cropsimulation models. Crop simulations based on two commonly grown cultivars (Pérola and BRS Radi-ante) and statistical analyses of simulated yield suggest that both rainfed seasons, wet and dry, can bedivided in two groups of environments: highly favorable environment and favorable environment. Forthe wet and dry seasons, the highly favorable environment represents 44% and 58% of production area,respectively. Across all rainfed environment groups, terminal and/or reproductive drought stress occursin roughly one fourth of the seasons (23.9% for Pérola and 24.7% for Radiante), with drought being mostlimiting in the favorable environment group in the dry TPE. Based on our results, we argue that eventhough drought-tailoring might not be warranted, the common bean breeding program should adapttheir selection practices to the range of stresses occurring in the rainfed TPEs to select genotypes moresuitable for these environments.
id EMBR_d23dde0c6d2babd729a21c42481e6850
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1046621
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.Environment classificationMelhoramento genéticoFeijãoPhaseolus vulgarisDeficiência hídricaRelação água-plantaBreedingModelsPlant-water relationsCommon bean production in Goiás, Brazil is concentrated in the same geographic area, but spread acrossthree distinct growing seasons, namely, wet, dry and winter. In the wet and dry seasons, common beansare grown under rainfed conditions, whereas the winter sowing is fully irrigated. The conventional breed-ing program performs all varietal selection stages solely in the winter season, with rainfed environmentsbeing incorporated in the breeding scheme only through the multi environment trials (METs) wherebasically only yield is recorded. As yield is the result of many interacting processes, it is challengingto determine the events (abiotic or biotic) associated with yield reduction in the rainfed environments(wet and dry seasons). To improve our understanding of rainfed dry bean production so as to produceinformation that can assist breeders in their efforts to develop stress-tolerant, high-yielding germplasm,we characterized environments by integrating weather, soil, crop and management factors using cropsimulation models. Crop simulations based on two commonly grown cultivars (Pérola and BRS Radi-ante) and statistical analyses of simulated yield suggest that both rainfed seasons, wet and dry, can bedivided in two groups of environments: highly favorable environment and favorable environment. Forthe wet and dry seasons, the highly favorable environment represents 44% and 58% of production area,respectively. Across all rainfed environment groups, terminal and/or reproductive drought stress occursin roughly one fourth of the seasons (23.9% for Pérola and 24.7% for Radiante), with drought being mostlimiting in the favorable environment group in the dry TPE. Based on our results, we argue that eventhough drought-tailoring might not be warranted, the common bean breeding program should adapttheir selection practices to the range of stresses occurring in the rainfed TPEs to select genotypes moresuitable for these environments.ALEXANDRE BRYAN HEINEMANN, CNPAF; JULIAN RAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, CIAT; THIAGO LIVIO PESSOA OLIV DE SOUZA, CNPAF; AGOSTINHO DIRCEU DIDONET, CNPAF; JOSE GERALDO DI STEFANO, CNPA; KENNETH J. BOOTE, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, Gainesville-FL; ANDY JARVIS, CIAT.HEINEMANN, A. B.RAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, J.SOUZA, T. L. P. O.DIDONET, A. D.DI STEFANO, J. G.BOOTE, K. J.JARVIS, A.2016-06-08T11:11:11Z2016-06-08T11:11:11Z2016-06-0820162017-03-07T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v. 225, p. 57-74, Sept. 2016.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/104662110.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.010enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T00:45:29Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1046621Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T00:45:29falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T00:45:29Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.
title Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.
spellingShingle Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.
HEINEMANN, A. B.
Environment classification
Melhoramento genético
Feijão
Phaseolus vulgaris
Deficiência hídrica
Relação água-planta
Breeding
Models
Plant-water relations
title_short Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.
title_full Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.
title_fullStr Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.
title_full_unstemmed Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.
title_sort Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.
author HEINEMANN, A. B.
author_facet HEINEMANN, A. B.
RAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, J.
SOUZA, T. L. P. O.
DIDONET, A. D.
DI STEFANO, J. G.
BOOTE, K. J.
JARVIS, A.
author_role author
author2 RAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, J.
SOUZA, T. L. P. O.
DIDONET, A. D.
DI STEFANO, J. G.
BOOTE, K. J.
JARVIS, A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv ALEXANDRE BRYAN HEINEMANN, CNPAF; JULIAN RAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, CIAT; THIAGO LIVIO PESSOA OLIV DE SOUZA, CNPAF; AGOSTINHO DIRCEU DIDONET, CNPAF; JOSE GERALDO DI STEFANO, CNPA; KENNETH J. BOOTE, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, Gainesville-FL; ANDY JARVIS, CIAT.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv HEINEMANN, A. B.
RAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, J.
SOUZA, T. L. P. O.
DIDONET, A. D.
DI STEFANO, J. G.
BOOTE, K. J.
JARVIS, A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environment classification
Melhoramento genético
Feijão
Phaseolus vulgaris
Deficiência hídrica
Relação água-planta
Breeding
Models
Plant-water relations
topic Environment classification
Melhoramento genético
Feijão
Phaseolus vulgaris
Deficiência hídrica
Relação água-planta
Breeding
Models
Plant-water relations
description Common bean production in Goiás, Brazil is concentrated in the same geographic area, but spread acrossthree distinct growing seasons, namely, wet, dry and winter. In the wet and dry seasons, common beansare grown under rainfed conditions, whereas the winter sowing is fully irrigated. The conventional breed-ing program performs all varietal selection stages solely in the winter season, with rainfed environmentsbeing incorporated in the breeding scheme only through the multi environment trials (METs) wherebasically only yield is recorded. As yield is the result of many interacting processes, it is challengingto determine the events (abiotic or biotic) associated with yield reduction in the rainfed environments(wet and dry seasons). To improve our understanding of rainfed dry bean production so as to produceinformation that can assist breeders in their efforts to develop stress-tolerant, high-yielding germplasm,we characterized environments by integrating weather, soil, crop and management factors using cropsimulation models. Crop simulations based on two commonly grown cultivars (Pérola and BRS Radi-ante) and statistical analyses of simulated yield suggest that both rainfed seasons, wet and dry, can bedivided in two groups of environments: highly favorable environment and favorable environment. Forthe wet and dry seasons, the highly favorable environment represents 44% and 58% of production area,respectively. Across all rainfed environment groups, terminal and/or reproductive drought stress occursin roughly one fourth of the seasons (23.9% for Pérola and 24.7% for Radiante), with drought being mostlimiting in the favorable environment group in the dry TPE. Based on our results, we argue that eventhough drought-tailoring might not be warranted, the common bean breeding program should adapttheir selection practices to the range of stresses occurring in the rainfed TPEs to select genotypes moresuitable for these environments.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-08T11:11:11Z
2016-06-08T11:11:11Z
2016-06-08
2016
2017-03-07T11:11:11Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v. 225, p. 57-74, Sept. 2016.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1046621
10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.010
identifier_str_mv Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v. 225, p. 57-74, Sept. 2016.
10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.010
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1046621
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503422339186689