Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: VICCA, S.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: BAHN, M., ESTIARTE, M., VAN LOON, E. E., VARGAS, R., ALBERTI, G., AMBUS, P., ARAIN, M. A., BEIER, C., BENTLEY, L. P., BORKEN, W., BUCHMANN, N., COLLINS, S. L., GATO, G. de, DUKES, J. S., ESCOLAR, C., FAY, P., GUIDOLOTTI, G., HANSON, P. J., KAHMEN, A., KRÖEL-DULAY, G., LADREITER-KNAUSS, T., LARSEN, K. S., LELLEI-KOVACS, E., LEBRIJA-TREJOS, E., MAESTRE, F. T., MARHAN, S., MARSHALL, M., MEIR, P., MIAO, Y., MUHR, J., NIKLAUS, P. A., OGAYA, R., PEÑUELAS, J., POLL, C., RUSTAD, L. E., SAVAGE, K., SCHINDLBACHER, A., SCHMIDT, I. K., SMITH, A. R., SOTTA, E. D., SUSEELA, V., TIETEMA, A., VAN GESTEL, N., VAN STRAATEN, O., WAN, S., WEBER, U., JANSSENS, I. A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1009572
Resumo: As a key component of the carbon cycle, soil CO2 efflux (SCE) is being increasingly studied to improve our mechanistic understanding of this important carbon flux. Predicting ecosystem responses to climate change often depends on extrapolation of current relationships between ecosystem processes and their climatic drivers to conditions not yet experienced by the ecosystem. This raises the question of to what extent these relationships remain unaltered beyond the current climatic window for which observations are available to constrain the relationships. Here, we evaluate whether current responses of SCE to fluctuations in soil temperature and soil water content can be used to predict SCE under altered rainfall patterns. Of the 58 experiments for which we gathered SCE data, 20 were discarded because either too few data were available or inconsistencies precluded their incorporation in the analyses. The 38 remaining experiments were used to test the hypothesis that a model parameterized with data from the control plots (using soil temperature and water content as predictor variables) could adequately predict SCE measured in the manipulated treatment. Only for 7 of these 38 experiments was this hypothesis rejected. Importantly, these were the experiments with the most reliable data sets, i.e., those providing high-frequency measurements of SCE. Regression tree analysis demonstrated that our hypothesis could be rejected only for experiments with measurement intervals of less than 11 days, and was not rejected for any of the 24 experiments with larger measurement intervals. This highlights the importance of high-frequency measurements when studying effects of altered precipitation on SCE, probably because infrequent measurement schemes have insufficient capacity to detect shifts in the climate dependencies of SCE. Hence, the most justified answer to the question of whether current moisture responses of SCE can be extrapolated to predict SCE under altered precipitation regimes is ?no? ? as based on the most reliable data sets available. We strongly recommend that future experiments focus more strongly on establishing response functions across a broader range of precipitation regimes and soil moisture conditions. Such experiments should make accurate measurements of water availability, should conduct high-frequency SCE measurements, and should consider both instantaneous responses and the potential legacy effects of climate extremes. This is important, because with the novel approach presented here, we demonstrated that, at least for some ecosystems, current moisture responses could not be extrapolated to predict SCE under altered rainfall conditions.
id EMBR_f44161be4d360e8998af6e7bb278e125
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1009572
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.RainfallSoloUmidadePrecipitação pluvialMudança Climáticaclimate changehumiditysoilAs a key component of the carbon cycle, soil CO2 efflux (SCE) is being increasingly studied to improve our mechanistic understanding of this important carbon flux. Predicting ecosystem responses to climate change often depends on extrapolation of current relationships between ecosystem processes and their climatic drivers to conditions not yet experienced by the ecosystem. This raises the question of to what extent these relationships remain unaltered beyond the current climatic window for which observations are available to constrain the relationships. Here, we evaluate whether current responses of SCE to fluctuations in soil temperature and soil water content can be used to predict SCE under altered rainfall patterns. Of the 58 experiments for which we gathered SCE data, 20 were discarded because either too few data were available or inconsistencies precluded their incorporation in the analyses. The 38 remaining experiments were used to test the hypothesis that a model parameterized with data from the control plots (using soil temperature and water content as predictor variables) could adequately predict SCE measured in the manipulated treatment. Only for 7 of these 38 experiments was this hypothesis rejected. Importantly, these were the experiments with the most reliable data sets, i.e., those providing high-frequency measurements of SCE. Regression tree analysis demonstrated that our hypothesis could be rejected only for experiments with measurement intervals of less than 11 days, and was not rejected for any of the 24 experiments with larger measurement intervals. This highlights the importance of high-frequency measurements when studying effects of altered precipitation on SCE, probably because infrequent measurement schemes have insufficient capacity to detect shifts in the climate dependencies of SCE. Hence, the most justified answer to the question of whether current moisture responses of SCE can be extrapolated to predict SCE under altered precipitation regimes is ?no? ? as based on the most reliable data sets available. We strongly recommend that future experiments focus more strongly on establishing response functions across a broader range of precipitation regimes and soil moisture conditions. Such experiments should make accurate measurements of water availability, should conduct high-frequency SCE measurements, and should consider both instantaneous responses and the potential legacy effects of climate extremes. This is important, because with the novel approach presented here, we demonstrated that, at least for some ecosystems, current moisture responses could not be extrapolated to predict SCE under altered rainfall conditions.ELENEIDE DOFF SOTTA, CPAF-AP.VICCA, S.BAHN, M.ESTIARTE, M.VAN LOON, E. E.VARGAS, R.ALBERTI, G.AMBUS, P.ARAIN, M. A.BEIER, C.BENTLEY, L. P.BORKEN, W.BUCHMANN, N.COLLINS, S. L.GATO, G. deDUKES, J. S.ESCOLAR, C.FAY, P.GUIDOLOTTI, G.HANSON, P. J.KAHMEN, A.KRÖEL-DULAY, G.LADREITER-KNAUSS, T.LARSEN, K. S.LELLEI-KOVACS, E.LEBRIJA-TREJOS, E.MAESTRE, F. T.MARHAN, S.MARSHALL, M.MEIR, P.MIAO, Y.MUHR, J.NIKLAUS, P. A.OGAYA, R.PEÑUELAS, J.POLL, C.RUSTAD, L. E.SAVAGE, K.SCHINDLBACHER, A.SCHMIDT, I. K.SMITH, A. R.SOTTA, E. D.SUSEELA, V.TIETEMA, A.VAN GESTEL, N.VAN STRAATEN, O.WAN, S.WEBER, U.JANSSENS, I. A.2015-02-27T22:06:49Z2015-02-27T22:06:49Z2015-02-2420142019-05-29T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBiogeosciences, v. 11, n. 11, p. 2991-3013, 2014.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1009572enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T01:51:09Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1009572Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T01:51:09falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T01:51:09Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.
title Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.
spellingShingle Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.
VICCA, S.
Rainfall
Solo
Umidade
Precipitação pluvial
Mudança Climática
climate change
humidity
soil
title_short Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.
title_full Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.
title_fullStr Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.
title_full_unstemmed Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.
title_sort Can current moisture responses predict soil CO2 efflux under altered precipitation regimes? A synthesis of manipulation experiments.
author VICCA, S.
author_facet VICCA, S.
BAHN, M.
ESTIARTE, M.
VAN LOON, E. E.
VARGAS, R.
ALBERTI, G.
AMBUS, P.
ARAIN, M. A.
BEIER, C.
BENTLEY, L. P.
BORKEN, W.
BUCHMANN, N.
COLLINS, S. L.
GATO, G. de
DUKES, J. S.
ESCOLAR, C.
FAY, P.
GUIDOLOTTI, G.
HANSON, P. J.
KAHMEN, A.
KRÖEL-DULAY, G.
LADREITER-KNAUSS, T.
LARSEN, K. S.
LELLEI-KOVACS, E.
LEBRIJA-TREJOS, E.
MAESTRE, F. T.
MARHAN, S.
MARSHALL, M.
MEIR, P.
MIAO, Y.
MUHR, J.
NIKLAUS, P. A.
OGAYA, R.
PEÑUELAS, J.
POLL, C.
RUSTAD, L. E.
SAVAGE, K.
SCHINDLBACHER, A.
SCHMIDT, I. K.
SMITH, A. R.
SOTTA, E. D.
SUSEELA, V.
TIETEMA, A.
VAN GESTEL, N.
VAN STRAATEN, O.
WAN, S.
WEBER, U.
JANSSENS, I. A.
author_role author
author2 BAHN, M.
ESTIARTE, M.
VAN LOON, E. E.
VARGAS, R.
ALBERTI, G.
AMBUS, P.
ARAIN, M. A.
BEIER, C.
BENTLEY, L. P.
BORKEN, W.
BUCHMANN, N.
COLLINS, S. L.
GATO, G. de
DUKES, J. S.
ESCOLAR, C.
FAY, P.
GUIDOLOTTI, G.
HANSON, P. J.
KAHMEN, A.
KRÖEL-DULAY, G.
LADREITER-KNAUSS, T.
LARSEN, K. S.
LELLEI-KOVACS, E.
LEBRIJA-TREJOS, E.
MAESTRE, F. T.
MARHAN, S.
MARSHALL, M.
MEIR, P.
MIAO, Y.
MUHR, J.
NIKLAUS, P. A.
OGAYA, R.
PEÑUELAS, J.
POLL, C.
RUSTAD, L. E.
SAVAGE, K.
SCHINDLBACHER, A.
SCHMIDT, I. K.
SMITH, A. R.
SOTTA, E. D.
SUSEELA, V.
TIETEMA, A.
VAN GESTEL, N.
VAN STRAATEN, O.
WAN, S.
WEBER, U.
JANSSENS, I. A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv ELENEIDE DOFF SOTTA, CPAF-AP.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv VICCA, S.
BAHN, M.
ESTIARTE, M.
VAN LOON, E. E.
VARGAS, R.
ALBERTI, G.
AMBUS, P.
ARAIN, M. A.
BEIER, C.
BENTLEY, L. P.
BORKEN, W.
BUCHMANN, N.
COLLINS, S. L.
GATO, G. de
DUKES, J. S.
ESCOLAR, C.
FAY, P.
GUIDOLOTTI, G.
HANSON, P. J.
KAHMEN, A.
KRÖEL-DULAY, G.
LADREITER-KNAUSS, T.
LARSEN, K. S.
LELLEI-KOVACS, E.
LEBRIJA-TREJOS, E.
MAESTRE, F. T.
MARHAN, S.
MARSHALL, M.
MEIR, P.
MIAO, Y.
MUHR, J.
NIKLAUS, P. A.
OGAYA, R.
PEÑUELAS, J.
POLL, C.
RUSTAD, L. E.
SAVAGE, K.
SCHINDLBACHER, A.
SCHMIDT, I. K.
SMITH, A. R.
SOTTA, E. D.
SUSEELA, V.
TIETEMA, A.
VAN GESTEL, N.
VAN STRAATEN, O.
WAN, S.
WEBER, U.
JANSSENS, I. A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rainfall
Solo
Umidade
Precipitação pluvial
Mudança Climática
climate change
humidity
soil
topic Rainfall
Solo
Umidade
Precipitação pluvial
Mudança Climática
climate change
humidity
soil
description As a key component of the carbon cycle, soil CO2 efflux (SCE) is being increasingly studied to improve our mechanistic understanding of this important carbon flux. Predicting ecosystem responses to climate change often depends on extrapolation of current relationships between ecosystem processes and their climatic drivers to conditions not yet experienced by the ecosystem. This raises the question of to what extent these relationships remain unaltered beyond the current climatic window for which observations are available to constrain the relationships. Here, we evaluate whether current responses of SCE to fluctuations in soil temperature and soil water content can be used to predict SCE under altered rainfall patterns. Of the 58 experiments for which we gathered SCE data, 20 were discarded because either too few data were available or inconsistencies precluded their incorporation in the analyses. The 38 remaining experiments were used to test the hypothesis that a model parameterized with data from the control plots (using soil temperature and water content as predictor variables) could adequately predict SCE measured in the manipulated treatment. Only for 7 of these 38 experiments was this hypothesis rejected. Importantly, these were the experiments with the most reliable data sets, i.e., those providing high-frequency measurements of SCE. Regression tree analysis demonstrated that our hypothesis could be rejected only for experiments with measurement intervals of less than 11 days, and was not rejected for any of the 24 experiments with larger measurement intervals. This highlights the importance of high-frequency measurements when studying effects of altered precipitation on SCE, probably because infrequent measurement schemes have insufficient capacity to detect shifts in the climate dependencies of SCE. Hence, the most justified answer to the question of whether current moisture responses of SCE can be extrapolated to predict SCE under altered precipitation regimes is ?no? ? as based on the most reliable data sets available. We strongly recommend that future experiments focus more strongly on establishing response functions across a broader range of precipitation regimes and soil moisture conditions. Such experiments should make accurate measurements of water availability, should conduct high-frequency SCE measurements, and should consider both instantaneous responses and the potential legacy effects of climate extremes. This is important, because with the novel approach presented here, we demonstrated that, at least for some ecosystems, current moisture responses could not be extrapolated to predict SCE under altered rainfall conditions.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2015-02-27T22:06:49Z
2015-02-27T22:06:49Z
2015-02-24
2019-05-29T11:11:11Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Biogeosciences, v. 11, n. 11, p. 2991-3013, 2014.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1009572
identifier_str_mv Biogeosciences, v. 11, n. 11, p. 2991-3013, 2014.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1009572
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503403049582592