Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MARIN, F. R.
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Capítulo de livro
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/924313
Resumo: The comparison among farming systems and regions would improve the understanding of how and what driving factors explains the crop yield variability over time and space. Very often, however, farm managers and policy makers fall in difficult to establish reliable indexes to compare farming systems plots and regions. Having a quantitate index, we could derive relationships regarding climate, soil and socioeconomic, as well as to determine which factors contribute or hinder the development in a given region and time. Monteith (1977) suggested agroecosystems as machines that utilize solar energy to maintain composition and organization. From a thermodynamic standpoint, the efficiency of any process can be expressed as the ratio of energy output to energy input. Since the 1970s, this concept has been applied to analyze the energy flow in agroecosystems, as well as to analyze the relation between biomass chemical energy and incident solar radiation. We could apply this approach to understand the regional agricultural development and crop yield gap, once it could elucidate biophysical factors, such as the pedoclimatic conditions, affecting crop yields at a local scale. However, for a broader evaluation, one should also include structural components, corresponding to the agricultural systems and management practices adopted; institutional effects, involving governmental actions affecting price, credit, commercialization, and incentives; and research and development, related to innovations to increase yield and solve problems that restrict agricultural-related activities (Carvalho, 2009). Also, to make this approach useful in an operational way, one could assume crop efficiency such as a quantitative indicator, helping to compare and evaluate in time and space, the farming development level. The efficiency of crop production can be assumed as the ratio between observed and attainable crop yield (Marin et al., 2008). In order to evaluate the effectiveness of this tool, the concept of crop efficiency was applied to study the sugarcane performance in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, the main region of this crop production, representing approximately 60% of the total Country's sugarcane production (IBGE, 2002).
id EMBR_f5ae522d3ed3645431c3d2f59ed57b44
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/924313
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.Manejo de cultivosProdução de cultivosCana de açúcarCrop managementCrop productionSugarcaneThe comparison among farming systems and regions would improve the understanding of how and what driving factors explains the crop yield variability over time and space. Very often, however, farm managers and policy makers fall in difficult to establish reliable indexes to compare farming systems plots and regions. Having a quantitate index, we could derive relationships regarding climate, soil and socioeconomic, as well as to determine which factors contribute or hinder the development in a given region and time. Monteith (1977) suggested agroecosystems as machines that utilize solar energy to maintain composition and organization. From a thermodynamic standpoint, the efficiency of any process can be expressed as the ratio of energy output to energy input. Since the 1970s, this concept has been applied to analyze the energy flow in agroecosystems, as well as to analyze the relation between biomass chemical energy and incident solar radiation. We could apply this approach to understand the regional agricultural development and crop yield gap, once it could elucidate biophysical factors, such as the pedoclimatic conditions, affecting crop yields at a local scale. However, for a broader evaluation, one should also include structural components, corresponding to the agricultural systems and management practices adopted; institutional effects, involving governmental actions affecting price, credit, commercialization, and incentives; and research and development, related to innovations to increase yield and solve problems that restrict agricultural-related activities (Carvalho, 2009). Also, to make this approach useful in an operational way, one could assume crop efficiency such as a quantitative indicator, helping to compare and evaluate in time and space, the farming development level. The efficiency of crop production can be assumed as the ratio between observed and attainable crop yield (Marin et al., 2008). In order to evaluate the effectiveness of this tool, the concept of crop efficiency was applied to study the sugarcane performance in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, the main region of this crop production, representing approximately 60% of the total Country's sugarcane production (IBGE, 2002).FÁBIO RICARDO MARIN, CNPTIA.MARIN, F. R.2012-05-10T11:11:11Z2012-05-10T11:11:11Z2012-05-10T11:11:11Z2012-05-10T11:11:11Z2012-05-1020122018-03-08T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartMARIN, F. R. (Ed.). Crop management - cases and tools for higher yield and sustainability. Rijeka: InTech, 2012. cap. 6, p. 109-118.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/924313enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-15T23:45:50Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/924313Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-15T23:45:50falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-15T23:45:50Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.
title Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.
spellingShingle Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.
MARIN, F. R.
Manejo de cultivos
Produção de cultivos
Cana de açúcar
Crop management
Crop production
Sugarcane
title_short Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.
title_full Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.
title_fullStr Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.
title_full_unstemmed Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.
title_sort Understanding sugarcane yield gap and bettering crop management through crop production efficiency.
author MARIN, F. R.
author_facet MARIN, F. R.
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv FÁBIO RICARDO MARIN, CNPTIA.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MARIN, F. R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Manejo de cultivos
Produção de cultivos
Cana de açúcar
Crop management
Crop production
Sugarcane
topic Manejo de cultivos
Produção de cultivos
Cana de açúcar
Crop management
Crop production
Sugarcane
description The comparison among farming systems and regions would improve the understanding of how and what driving factors explains the crop yield variability over time and space. Very often, however, farm managers and policy makers fall in difficult to establish reliable indexes to compare farming systems plots and regions. Having a quantitate index, we could derive relationships regarding climate, soil and socioeconomic, as well as to determine which factors contribute or hinder the development in a given region and time. Monteith (1977) suggested agroecosystems as machines that utilize solar energy to maintain composition and organization. From a thermodynamic standpoint, the efficiency of any process can be expressed as the ratio of energy output to energy input. Since the 1970s, this concept has been applied to analyze the energy flow in agroecosystems, as well as to analyze the relation between biomass chemical energy and incident solar radiation. We could apply this approach to understand the regional agricultural development and crop yield gap, once it could elucidate biophysical factors, such as the pedoclimatic conditions, affecting crop yields at a local scale. However, for a broader evaluation, one should also include structural components, corresponding to the agricultural systems and management practices adopted; institutional effects, involving governmental actions affecting price, credit, commercialization, and incentives; and research and development, related to innovations to increase yield and solve problems that restrict agricultural-related activities (Carvalho, 2009). Also, to make this approach useful in an operational way, one could assume crop efficiency such as a quantitative indicator, helping to compare and evaluate in time and space, the farming development level. The efficiency of crop production can be assumed as the ratio between observed and attainable crop yield (Marin et al., 2008). In order to evaluate the effectiveness of this tool, the concept of crop efficiency was applied to study the sugarcane performance in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, the main region of this crop production, representing approximately 60% of the total Country's sugarcane production (IBGE, 2002).
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05-10T11:11:11Z
2012-05-10T11:11:11Z
2012-05-10T11:11:11Z
2012-05-10T11:11:11Z
2012-05-10
2012
2018-03-08T11:11:11Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
format bookPart
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv MARIN, F. R. (Ed.). Crop management - cases and tools for higher yield and sustainability. Rijeka: InTech, 2012. cap. 6, p. 109-118.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/924313
identifier_str_mv MARIN, F. R. (Ed.). Crop management - cases and tools for higher yield and sustainability. Rijeka: InTech, 2012. cap. 6, p. 109-118.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/924313
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503362975105024