Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theory

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cordeiro, Thiago Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da EMERJ (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/501
Resumo: The New Code of Civil Procedure affirmed the principle of cooperation in several devices, especially in its art. 6th. One of the most notorious expressions of that principle is the mandatory designation of a conciliation hearing for the self-composition of the parties, pursuant to art. 334 of encoding. The concern of the new law to make procedural rules more flexible, streamline procedures and resolve cases through conciliation is based on the need to modernize the exercise of jurisdiction in the face of the current demands of society. In this way, several institutes were created by the legislator, while others are suggested by the doctrine, with the aim of fostering the conciliatory interest of the parties. However, the success of the measures, in some contexts, has still been unsatisfactory. Based on game theory, it is possible to equate the variables involved in the decision-making process of those under jurisdiction regarding conciliation, thus allowing a critical analysis of the institutes used and the suggestion of what could be changed to optimize the implementation of the legislator's political choice.
id EMERJ-2_8ab69e18c44faba21874b7244006e4e0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/501
network_acronym_str EMERJ-2
network_name_str Revista da EMERJ (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theoryAs estratégias de conciliação no novo Código de Processo Civil: Um olhar através da teoria dos jogosconciliaçãoautocomposiçãoteoria dos jogosprocesso civilconciliationself-compositiongame theorycivil procedureThe New Code of Civil Procedure affirmed the principle of cooperation in several devices, especially in its art. 6th. One of the most notorious expressions of that principle is the mandatory designation of a conciliation hearing for the self-composition of the parties, pursuant to art. 334 of encoding. The concern of the new law to make procedural rules more flexible, streamline procedures and resolve cases through conciliation is based on the need to modernize the exercise of jurisdiction in the face of the current demands of society. In this way, several institutes were created by the legislator, while others are suggested by the doctrine, with the aim of fostering the conciliatory interest of the parties. However, the success of the measures, in some contexts, has still been unsatisfactory. Based on game theory, it is possible to equate the variables involved in the decision-making process of those under jurisdiction regarding conciliation, thus allowing a critical analysis of the institutes used and the suggestion of what could be changed to optimize the implementation of the legislator's political choice.O Novo Código de Processo Civil positivou o princípio de cooperação em diversos dispositivos, especialmente em seu art. 6º. Uma das expressões mais notórias do referido princípio é a designação obrigatória de audiência de conciliação para autocomposição das partes, consoante art. 334 da codificação. A preocupação da nova lei em flexibilizar normas processuais, enxugar procedimentos e resolver processos por meio de conciliação encontra fundamento na necessidade de modernizar o exercício da jurisdição frente às atuais demandas da sociedade. Dessa forma, diversos institutos foram criados pelo legislador, enquanto outros são sugeridos pela doutrina, com o intuito de fomentar o interesse conciliatório das partes. No entanto, o êxito das medidas, em alguns contextos, tem sido ainda insatisfatório. A partir da teoria dos jogos é possível equacionar as variáveis envolvidas no processo de tomada de escolha dos jurisdicionados quanto à conciliação, permitindo assim uma análise crítica dos institutos utilizados e a sugestão do que poderia ser mudado para otimizar a concretização da escolha política do legislador.Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2023-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/501Revista da EMERJ; v. 25 n. 2 (2023): Revista da EMERJ; 111-1342236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/501/290Copyright (c) 2023 Thiago Ferreira Cordeirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCordeiro, Thiago Ferreira2023-12-12T14:34:33Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/501Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-12-12T14:34:33Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theory
As estratégias de conciliação no novo Código de Processo Civil: Um olhar através da teoria dos jogos
title Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theory
spellingShingle Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theory
Cordeiro, Thiago Ferreira
conciliação
autocomposição
teoria dos jogos
processo civil
conciliation
self-composition
game theory
civil procedure
title_short Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theory
title_full Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theory
title_fullStr Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theory
title_full_unstemmed Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theory
title_sort Conciliation strategies in the New Procedure Code: A look through game theory
author Cordeiro, Thiago Ferreira
author_facet Cordeiro, Thiago Ferreira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cordeiro, Thiago Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv conciliação
autocomposição
teoria dos jogos
processo civil
conciliation
self-composition
game theory
civil procedure
topic conciliação
autocomposição
teoria dos jogos
processo civil
conciliation
self-composition
game theory
civil procedure
description The New Code of Civil Procedure affirmed the principle of cooperation in several devices, especially in its art. 6th. One of the most notorious expressions of that principle is the mandatory designation of a conciliation hearing for the self-composition of the parties, pursuant to art. 334 of encoding. The concern of the new law to make procedural rules more flexible, streamline procedures and resolve cases through conciliation is based on the need to modernize the exercise of jurisdiction in the face of the current demands of society. In this way, several institutes were created by the legislator, while others are suggested by the doctrine, with the aim of fostering the conciliatory interest of the parties. However, the success of the measures, in some contexts, has still been unsatisfactory. Based on game theory, it is possible to equate the variables involved in the decision-making process of those under jurisdiction regarding conciliation, thus allowing a critical analysis of the institutes used and the suggestion of what could be changed to optimize the implementation of the legislator's political choice.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/501
url https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/501
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/501/290
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Thiago Ferreira Cordeiro
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Thiago Ferreira Cordeiro
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ; v. 25 n. 2 (2023): Revista da EMERJ; 111-134
2236-8957
1415-4951
reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)
instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron:EMERJ
instname_str Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron_str EMERJ
institution EMERJ
reponame_str Revista da EMERJ (Online)
collection Revista da EMERJ (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br
_version_ 1797041854691147776

Registros relacionados