Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis method

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Campagnaro, Virgínia Hamer
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Farias, Luciana Aparecida, Candiani, Giovano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista ENIAC pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisa/article/view/857
Resumo: Projects, activities or undertakings, causing a significant environmental impact, must be licensed through the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), which is linked to the presentation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). One criticism of the EIA has been its low quality. The objective of the work is to evaluate the quality of an Environmental Impact Statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley evaluation method. From the application of this method, grade E was obtained for this EIA, characterizing it as unsatisfactory, with omissions and significant inadequate points. Lee & Colley's analysis presents a total of 73 analysis criteria, including 4 areas, 17 categories and 52 subcategories. Of this total, 73 analytical items (criteria), 24 (about 33%) received grade D, 22 (30%) obtained grade E, 6 (8%) had grade F. With this, 71% of the items of the assessed EIA were considered inadequate. From this work, it was possible to show that the evaluated EIA does not present satisfactory quality, making the process of environmental licensing and decision-making about the socio-environmental viability of the enterprise in question difficult.
id ENIAC-1_ccdab64ede9db0e37227b8dc3626979a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/857
network_acronym_str ENIAC-1
network_name_str Revista ENIAC pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis methodQualidade de um estudo de impacto ambiental, por meio da aplicação do método de análise de Lee & Colleyenvironmental impactenvironmental impact assessmentquality reviewenvironmental impact statementimpacto ambientalavaliação de impacto ambientalrevisão da qualidadeestudo de impacto ambientalProjects, activities or undertakings, causing a significant environmental impact, must be licensed through the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), which is linked to the presentation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). One criticism of the EIA has been its low quality. The objective of the work is to evaluate the quality of an Environmental Impact Statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley evaluation method. From the application of this method, grade E was obtained for this EIA, characterizing it as unsatisfactory, with omissions and significant inadequate points. Lee & Colley's analysis presents a total of 73 analysis criteria, including 4 areas, 17 categories and 52 subcategories. Of this total, 73 analytical items (criteria), 24 (about 33%) received grade D, 22 (30%) obtained grade E, 6 (8%) had grade F. With this, 71% of the items of the assessed EIA were considered inadequate. From this work, it was possible to show that the evaluated EIA does not present satisfactory quality, making the process of environmental licensing and decision-making about the socio-environmental viability of the enterprise in question difficult.Projetos, atividades ou empreendimentos causadores de significativo impacto ambiental, devem ser licenciados por meio da Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental (AIA), a qual encontra-se vinculada à apresentação do Estudo de Impacto Ambiental (EIA). Uma crítica em relação ao EIA têm sido sua baixa qualidade. O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar a qualidade de um estudo de impacto ambiental, por meio da aplicação do método de análise de Lee & Colley. A partir da aplicação desse método, foi obtida a nota E para este EIA, caracterizando-o como insatisfatório, possuindo omissões e pontos inadequados significativos. A análise de Lee & Colley apresenta ao todo 73 critérios de análise, incluindo 4 áreas, 17 categorias e 52 subcategorias. Deste total, 73 itens (critérios) analíticos, 24 (cerca de 33%) receberam nota D, 22 (30%) obtiveram nota E e 6 (8%) tiveram nota F. Com isto, 71% dos itens do EIA avaliado foram considerados inadequados. A partir do presente trabalho, foi possível evidenciar que o EIA avaliado não apresenta qualidade satisfatória, dificultando o processo de licenciamento ambiental e a tomada de decisão sobre a viabilidade socioambiental do empreendimento em questão.Centro Universitário ENIAC2023-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisa/article/view/85710.22567/rep.v12i1.857Revista Eniac Pesquisa; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023); 70-89REVISTA ENIAC PESQUISA; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2023); 70-89REVISTA ENIAC PESQUISA; v. 12 n. 1 (2023); 70-892316-234110.22567/rep.v12i1reponame:Revista ENIAC pesquisainstname:Centro Universitário Eniacinstacron:ENIACporenghttps://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisa/article/view/857/905https://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisa/article/view/857/915Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA ENIAC PESQUISAhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCampagnaro, Virgínia HamerFarias, Luciana AparecidaCandiani, Giovano2024-07-09T18:47:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/857Revistahttps://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisaPRIhttp://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisa/oai||revistaeniacpesquisa@fernandoasantos.com.br2316-23412316-2341opendoar:2024-07-09T18:47:59Revista ENIAC pesquisa - Centro Universitário Eniacfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis method
Qualidade de um estudo de impacto ambiental, por meio da aplicação do método de análise de Lee & Colley
title Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis method
spellingShingle Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis method
Campagnaro, Virgínia Hamer
environmental impact
environmental impact assessment
quality review
environmental impact statement
impacto ambiental
avaliação de impacto ambiental
revisão da qualidade
estudo de impacto ambiental
title_short Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis method
title_full Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis method
title_fullStr Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis method
title_full_unstemmed Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis method
title_sort Quality of an environmental impact statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley analysis method
author Campagnaro, Virgínia Hamer
author_facet Campagnaro, Virgínia Hamer
Farias, Luciana Aparecida
Candiani, Giovano
author_role author
author2 Farias, Luciana Aparecida
Candiani, Giovano
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Campagnaro, Virgínia Hamer
Farias, Luciana Aparecida
Candiani, Giovano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv environmental impact
environmental impact assessment
quality review
environmental impact statement
impacto ambiental
avaliação de impacto ambiental
revisão da qualidade
estudo de impacto ambiental
topic environmental impact
environmental impact assessment
quality review
environmental impact statement
impacto ambiental
avaliação de impacto ambiental
revisão da qualidade
estudo de impacto ambiental
description Projects, activities or undertakings, causing a significant environmental impact, must be licensed through the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), which is linked to the presentation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). One criticism of the EIA has been its low quality. The objective of the work is to evaluate the quality of an Environmental Impact Statement, through the application of the Lee & Colley evaluation method. From the application of this method, grade E was obtained for this EIA, characterizing it as unsatisfactory, with omissions and significant inadequate points. Lee & Colley's analysis presents a total of 73 analysis criteria, including 4 areas, 17 categories and 52 subcategories. Of this total, 73 analytical items (criteria), 24 (about 33%) received grade D, 22 (30%) obtained grade E, 6 (8%) had grade F. With this, 71% of the items of the assessed EIA were considered inadequate. From this work, it was possible to show that the evaluated EIA does not present satisfactory quality, making the process of environmental licensing and decision-making about the socio-environmental viability of the enterprise in question difficult.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisa/article/view/857
10.22567/rep.v12i1.857
url https://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisa/article/view/857
identifier_str_mv 10.22567/rep.v12i1.857
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisa/article/view/857/905
https://ojs.eniac.com.br/index.php/EniacPesquisa/article/view/857/915
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA ENIAC PESQUISA
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA ENIAC PESQUISA
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário ENIAC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário ENIAC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eniac Pesquisa; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023); 70-89
REVISTA ENIAC PESQUISA; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2023); 70-89
REVISTA ENIAC PESQUISA; v. 12 n. 1 (2023); 70-89
2316-2341
10.22567/rep.v12i1
reponame:Revista ENIAC pesquisa
instname:Centro Universitário Eniac
instacron:ENIAC
instname_str Centro Universitário Eniac
instacron_str ENIAC
institution ENIAC
reponame_str Revista ENIAC pesquisa
collection Revista ENIAC pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista ENIAC pesquisa - Centro Universitário Eniac
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaeniacpesquisa@fernandoasantos.com.br
_version_ 1809207908433395712

Registros relacionados