Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/961 |
Resumo: | Grapevine is highly dependent on arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF). Grapevine rootstocks havedifferent rooting abilities, and some of them show difficulties to root. The present study intended to evaluate the effects of inoculation of different AMF on rooting and vegetative growth of grapevine rootstocks with different rooting abilities. The experiment was carried out at Eldorado do Sul, RS, with two Vitis sp. used as rootstockcultivars (101-14 and 420-A) and three AMF species (Acaulospora scrobiculata, Glomus clarum and Scutellospora heterogama). Rootstock cuttings were placed in greenhouse conditions, in pots with a soil substrate:sand: decomposed bark residue of Acacia mearnsii (2:2:1), which had been previously desinfested (phormaldehyde at 10%),amended or not with AMF inoculum. Rootstock ‘101-14’ presented the highest rooting ability (95%, compared to 80% of the ‘420-A’) the highest number of roots/plant (41, compared to 12 of the ‘420-A’), and the highest reserve contents (33,36% in the cuttings and 28,06% in the roots, compared to, respectively, 30,53% and 25,3% on ‘420-A’).Acaulospora scrobiculata and G. clarum did not affect rooting ability, vegetative growth and the reserve contents of both cultivars while inoculation with S. heterogama resulted in leaf area reduction on ‘420-A’, though not influencing the other evaluated parameters. |
id |
EPAGRI_0498c4e82973b0fde724e18a88986c6c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/961 |
network_acronym_str |
EPAGRI |
network_name_str |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungiResposta de porta-enxertos de videira à inoculação com fungos micorrízicos arbuscularesendomicorrizasVitis sp.propagação.endomycorrhizal fungivitispropagationGrapevine is highly dependent on arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF). Grapevine rootstocks havedifferent rooting abilities, and some of them show difficulties to root. The present study intended to evaluate the effects of inoculation of different AMF on rooting and vegetative growth of grapevine rootstocks with different rooting abilities. The experiment was carried out at Eldorado do Sul, RS, with two Vitis sp. used as rootstockcultivars (101-14 and 420-A) and three AMF species (Acaulospora scrobiculata, Glomus clarum and Scutellospora heterogama). Rootstock cuttings were placed in greenhouse conditions, in pots with a soil substrate:sand: decomposed bark residue of Acacia mearnsii (2:2:1), which had been previously desinfested (phormaldehyde at 10%),amended or not with AMF inoculum. Rootstock ‘101-14’ presented the highest rooting ability (95%, compared to 80% of the ‘420-A’) the highest number of roots/plant (41, compared to 12 of the ‘420-A’), and the highest reserve contents (33,36% in the cuttings and 28,06% in the roots, compared to, respectively, 30,53% and 25,3% on ‘420-A’).Acaulospora scrobiculata and G. clarum did not affect rooting ability, vegetative growth and the reserve contents of both cultivars while inoculation with S. heterogama resulted in leaf area reduction on ‘420-A’, though not influencing the other evaluated parameters. A videira é altamente dependente de fungos micorrízicos arbusculares (FMA), sendo que os porta-enxertos apresentam diferentes aptidões ao enraizamento.O presente trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar a eficiência da inoculação de FMA no enraizamento e crescimento vegetativo de porta-enxertos de videira com diferentes aptidões ao enraizamento. O experimento foi realizado em casa de vegetação, sendo utilizados dois porta-enxertos (420-A e 101-14) e três espécies de FMA (Acaulospora scrobiculata, Glomus clarum e Scutellospora heterogama). As estacas dos porta-enxertos foram plantadas em recipientes contendo substrato composto por terra argilosa:areia:casca de acácia (2:2:1; v:v:v) previamente desinfestado com formaldeído (10%) contendo ou nãoinóculo de FMA. O porta-enxerto 101-14 apresentou maior enraizamento (95%, comparativamente a 80% no ‘420-A’), maior número de raízes por planta (41 contra 12 no ‘420-A’) e teor de reservas mais elevado em seus tecidos (33,36% na parte aérea e 28,06% nas raízes, comparativamente a 30,53% na parte aérea e 25,3% nas raízes do ‘420-A’). Acaulospora scrobiculata e Glomus clarum não afetaram o enraizamento, o crescimento vegetativo e o teor de reservas nos tecidos dos porta-enxertos avaliados, enquanto que Scutellospora heterogamaprovocou apenas redução na área foliar do porta-enxerto 420-A.Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri2021-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/961Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2005); 87-90Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 18 n. 1 (2005); 87-902525-60760103-0779reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)instacron:EPAGRIporhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/961/859Copyright (c) 2005 Agropecuaria catarinensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBüttenbender, Danielde Souza, Paulo Vitor Dutra 2021-06-23T14:20:32Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/961Revistahttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/RAC/indexPUBhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/index.php/RAC/oaieditoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br2525-60760103-0779opendoar:2021-06-23T14:20:32Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Resposta de porta-enxertos de videira à inoculação com fungos micorrízicos arbusculares |
title |
Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
spellingShingle |
Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Büttenbender, Daniel endomicorrizas Vitis sp. propagação. endomycorrhizal fungi vitis propagation |
title_short |
Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title_full |
Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title_fullStr |
Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title_full_unstemmed |
Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title_sort |
Response of grapevine rootstocks to inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
author |
Büttenbender, Daniel |
author_facet |
Büttenbender, Daniel de Souza, Paulo Vitor Dutra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Souza, Paulo Vitor Dutra |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Büttenbender, Daniel de Souza, Paulo Vitor Dutra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
endomicorrizas Vitis sp. propagação. endomycorrhizal fungi vitis propagation |
topic |
endomicorrizas Vitis sp. propagação. endomycorrhizal fungi vitis propagation |
description |
Grapevine is highly dependent on arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF). Grapevine rootstocks havedifferent rooting abilities, and some of them show difficulties to root. The present study intended to evaluate the effects of inoculation of different AMF on rooting and vegetative growth of grapevine rootstocks with different rooting abilities. The experiment was carried out at Eldorado do Sul, RS, with two Vitis sp. used as rootstockcultivars (101-14 and 420-A) and three AMF species (Acaulospora scrobiculata, Glomus clarum and Scutellospora heterogama). Rootstock cuttings were placed in greenhouse conditions, in pots with a soil substrate:sand: decomposed bark residue of Acacia mearnsii (2:2:1), which had been previously desinfested (phormaldehyde at 10%),amended or not with AMF inoculum. Rootstock ‘101-14’ presented the highest rooting ability (95%, compared to 80% of the ‘420-A’) the highest number of roots/plant (41, compared to 12 of the ‘420-A’), and the highest reserve contents (33,36% in the cuttings and 28,06% in the roots, compared to, respectively, 30,53% and 25,3% on ‘420-A’).Acaulospora scrobiculata and G. clarum did not affect rooting ability, vegetative growth and the reserve contents of both cultivars while inoculation with S. heterogama resulted in leaf area reduction on ‘420-A’, though not influencing the other evaluated parameters. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/961 |
url |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/961 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/961/859 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2005 Agropecuaria catarinense https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2005 Agropecuaria catarinense https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2005); 87-90 Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 18 n. 1 (2005); 87-90 2525-6076 0103-0779 reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) instacron:EPAGRI |
instname_str |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) |
instacron_str |
EPAGRI |
institution |
EPAGRI |
reponame_str |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
collection |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br |
_version_ |
1754917260768575488 |