White spot in maize: etiology and control

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borsoi, Felipe Tecchio
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Schmitz, Leonardo, Wordell Filho, João Américo, Nesi, Cristiano Nunes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
Texto Completo: https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/191
Resumo: The White spot (WS), which has the bacterium Pantoea ananatis as the main pathogen, associated with fungal species, like Phaeosphaeria maydis, is a disease that has been causing reductions in the maize yield. Losses can reach up to 60%when susceptible hybrids are used and conditions for the disease are favorable. This study aims to present some information about WS and main control methods. Among the control methods recommended, genetic, cultural and chemical control standout, but fungicides are the most used tool, highlighting the strobilurin group because it presents the best results.
id EPAGRI_a2567cc058b05f2b8c25bd871b2c9e0d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/191
network_acronym_str EPAGRI
network_name_str Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling White spot in maize: etiology and controlMancha branca no milho: etiologia e controleZea maysPantoea ananatisControle Químico.Zea maysPantoea ananatischemical controlThe White spot (WS), which has the bacterium Pantoea ananatis as the main pathogen, associated with fungal species, like Phaeosphaeria maydis, is a disease that has been causing reductions in the maize yield. Losses can reach up to 60%when susceptible hybrids are used and conditions for the disease are favorable. This study aims to present some information about WS and main control methods. Among the control methods recommended, genetic, cultural and chemical control standout, but fungicides are the most used tool, highlighting the strobilurin group because it presents the best results.A mancha branca, que tem a bactéria Pantoea ananatis como principal agente etiológico, além de espécies fúngicas associadas, como Phaeosphaeria maydis, é uma doença que vem causando reduções na produtividade do milho, podendo chegar até 60% quando são utilizados híbridos sujeitos a condições favoráveis para a doença. Este trabalho tem como objetivo apresentar informações sobre a mancha branca e suas principais técnicas de manejo. Entre tais técnicas, destacam-se os controles genético, cultural e químico, sendo este último o mais utilizado, com ênfase na aplicação do grupo das estrobilurinas, por apresentar os melhores resultados.The White spot (WS), which has the bacterium Pantoea ananatis as the main pathogen, associated with fungal species, like Phaeosphaeria maydis, is a disease that has been causing reductions in the maize yield. Losses can reach up to 60% when susceptible hybrids are used and conditions for the disease are favorable. This study aims to present some information about WS and main control methods. Among the control methods recommended, genetic, cultural and chemical control stand out, but fungicides are the most used tool, highlighting the strobilurin group because it presents the best results. Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri2018-10-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/191Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 31 No. 3 (2018); 31-34Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 31 n. 3 (2018); 31-342525-60760103-0779reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)instacron:EPAGRIporhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/191/268Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Agropecuária Catarinensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorsoi, Felipe TecchioSchmitz, LeonardoWordell Filho, João AméricoNesi, Cristiano Nunes2019-07-25T22:14:35Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/191Revistahttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/RAC/indexPUBhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/index.php/RAC/oaieditoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br2525-60760103-0779opendoar:2019-07-25T22:14:35Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv White spot in maize: etiology and control
Mancha branca no milho: etiologia e controle
title White spot in maize: etiology and control
spellingShingle White spot in maize: etiology and control
Borsoi, Felipe Tecchio
Zea mays
Pantoea ananatis
Controle Químico.
Zea mays
Pantoea ananatis
chemical control
title_short White spot in maize: etiology and control
title_full White spot in maize: etiology and control
title_fullStr White spot in maize: etiology and control
title_full_unstemmed White spot in maize: etiology and control
title_sort White spot in maize: etiology and control
author Borsoi, Felipe Tecchio
author_facet Borsoi, Felipe Tecchio
Schmitz, Leonardo
Wordell Filho, João Américo
Nesi, Cristiano Nunes
author_role author
author2 Schmitz, Leonardo
Wordell Filho, João Américo
Nesi, Cristiano Nunes
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borsoi, Felipe Tecchio
Schmitz, Leonardo
Wordell Filho, João Américo
Nesi, Cristiano Nunes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays
Pantoea ananatis
Controle Químico.
Zea mays
Pantoea ananatis
chemical control
topic Zea mays
Pantoea ananatis
Controle Químico.
Zea mays
Pantoea ananatis
chemical control
description The White spot (WS), which has the bacterium Pantoea ananatis as the main pathogen, associated with fungal species, like Phaeosphaeria maydis, is a disease that has been causing reductions in the maize yield. Losses can reach up to 60%when susceptible hybrids are used and conditions for the disease are favorable. This study aims to present some information about WS and main control methods. Among the control methods recommended, genetic, cultural and chemical control standout, but fungicides are the most used tool, highlighting the strobilurin group because it presents the best results.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/191
url https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/191
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/191/268
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Agropecuária Catarinense
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Agropecuária Catarinense
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 31 No. 3 (2018); 31-34
Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 31 n. 3 (2018); 31-34
2525-6076
0103-0779
reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)
instacron:EPAGRI
instname_str Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)
instacron_str EPAGRI
institution EPAGRI
reponame_str Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
collection Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br
_version_ 1754917258520428544

Registros relacionados