THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, Vinicius Pinheiro
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Borba, Graziele Coelho, Stefany Saboia Pinto, Raabe
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Esmat
Texto Completo: http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282
Resumo: The Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 adopted the model of the cooperative process, imposing several procedural duties on the parties. The magistrates, in the exercise of the function of deciding, must render decisions properly justified, as recommended in art. 489, paragraph 1, of CPC/2015. The central problem of the research resided in the following question: at what level of argument is the duty to justify the judicial decisions established by the civil procedural norm? The objective of the research was to analyze the level of argumentation required by the CPC/2015 in light of Lawrence Kohlberg's moral development theory. To achieve such aspiration the method used was the deductive, with bibliographical data research with a qualitative approach. The research carried out had a theoretical focus with exploratory purpose. In the end, it was concluded that, due to the cooperative process model, the duty of justification required by the CPC, especially with regard to art. 489, §1, matches to the post conventional level of the Kohlberg theory.
id ESMAT_7d66e13af5608dd3481eadb4f0eecc9b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/282
network_acronym_str ESMAT
network_name_str Revista Esmat
repository_id_str
spelling THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERGO MODELO DE PROCESSO CIVIL COOPERATIVO COMO INSTRUMENTO DE CONSTRUÇÃO DA DECISÃO JUDICIAL: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DA TEORIA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO MORAL DE LAWRENCE KOHLBERGThe Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 adopted the model of the cooperative process, imposing several procedural duties on the parties. The magistrates, in the exercise of the function of deciding, must render decisions properly justified, as recommended in art. 489, paragraph 1, of CPC/2015. The central problem of the research resided in the following question: at what level of argument is the duty to justify the judicial decisions established by the civil procedural norm? The objective of the research was to analyze the level of argumentation required by the CPC/2015 in light of Lawrence Kohlberg's moral development theory. To achieve such aspiration the method used was the deductive, with bibliographical data research with a qualitative approach. The research carried out had a theoretical focus with exploratory purpose. In the end, it was concluded that, due to the cooperative process model, the duty of justification required by the CPC, especially with regard to art. 489, §1, matches to the post conventional level of the Kohlberg theory.O Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, adotou o modelo do processo cooperativo imprimindo diversos deveres processuais às partes. Aos magistrados, no exercício da função de decidir, cabe proferir decisões adequadamente justificadas, conforme preconiza o art. 489, § 1º, do Código de Processo Civil, de 2015. O problema central da pesquisa residiu no seguinte questionamento: Em qual nível de argumentação encontra-se o dever de fundamentação das decisões judiciais estampadas pela norma processual civil? O objetivo da pesquisa foi analisar o nível de argumentação exigido pelo Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, à luz da teoria do desenvolvimento moral de Lawrence Kohlberg. Para alcançar tal desiderato, o método utilizado foi o dedutivo, com pesquisa de dados bibliográficos com abordagem qualitativa. A pesquisa realizada teve foco teórico com finalidade exploratória. Ao final, concluiu-se que, em decorrência do modelo de processo cooperativo, o dever de fundamentação exigida pelo Código de Processo Civil, em especial quanto ao art. 489, § 1º, enquadra-se no nível de pós-convencionalidade da teoria de Kohlberg.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2019-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/28210.34060/reesmat.v11i18.282ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 11 No. 17 (2019); 39-56REVISTA ESMAT; v. 11 n. 17 (2019); 39-562447-98962177-036010.34060/reesmat.v11i18reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282/238Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMATinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, Vinicius PinheiroBorba, Graziele CoelhoStefany Saboia Pinto, Raabe 2021-10-28T04:14:47Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/282Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2021-10-28T04:14:47Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
O MODELO DE PROCESSO CIVIL COOPERATIVO COMO INSTRUMENTO DE CONSTRUÇÃO DA DECISÃO JUDICIAL: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DA TEORIA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO MORAL DE LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
title THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
spellingShingle THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
Marques, Vinicius Pinheiro
title_short THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
title_full THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
title_fullStr THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
title_full_unstemmed THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
title_sort THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
author Marques, Vinicius Pinheiro
author_facet Marques, Vinicius Pinheiro
Borba, Graziele Coelho
Stefany Saboia Pinto, Raabe
author_role author
author2 Borba, Graziele Coelho
Stefany Saboia Pinto, Raabe
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, Vinicius Pinheiro
Borba, Graziele Coelho
Stefany Saboia Pinto, Raabe
description The Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 adopted the model of the cooperative process, imposing several procedural duties on the parties. The magistrates, in the exercise of the function of deciding, must render decisions properly justified, as recommended in art. 489, paragraph 1, of CPC/2015. The central problem of the research resided in the following question: at what level of argument is the duty to justify the judicial decisions established by the civil procedural norm? The objective of the research was to analyze the level of argumentation required by the CPC/2015 in light of Lawrence Kohlberg's moral development theory. To achieve such aspiration the method used was the deductive, with bibliographical data research with a qualitative approach. The research carried out had a theoretical focus with exploratory purpose. In the end, it was concluded that, due to the cooperative process model, the duty of justification required by the CPC, especially with regard to art. 489, §1, matches to the post conventional level of the Kohlberg theory.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282
10.34060/reesmat.v11i18.282
url http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282
identifier_str_mv 10.34060/reesmat.v11i18.282
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282/238
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMAT
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMAT
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 11 No. 17 (2019); 39-56
REVISTA ESMAT; v. 11 n. 17 (2019); 39-56
2447-9896
2177-0360
10.34060/reesmat.v11i18
reponame:Revista Esmat
instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
instacron:ESMAT
instname_str Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
instacron_str ESMAT
institution ESMAT
reponame_str Revista Esmat
collection Revista Esmat
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br
_version_ 1809282623224152064