THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Esmat |
Texto Completo: | http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282 |
Resumo: | The Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 adopted the model of the cooperative process, imposing several procedural duties on the parties. The magistrates, in the exercise of the function of deciding, must render decisions properly justified, as recommended in art. 489, paragraph 1, of CPC/2015. The central problem of the research resided in the following question: at what level of argument is the duty to justify the judicial decisions established by the civil procedural norm? The objective of the research was to analyze the level of argumentation required by the CPC/2015 in light of Lawrence Kohlberg's moral development theory. To achieve such aspiration the method used was the deductive, with bibliographical data research with a qualitative approach. The research carried out had a theoretical focus with exploratory purpose. In the end, it was concluded that, due to the cooperative process model, the duty of justification required by the CPC, especially with regard to art. 489, §1, matches to the post conventional level of the Kohlberg theory. |
id |
ESMAT_7d66e13af5608dd3481eadb4f0eecc9b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/282 |
network_acronym_str |
ESMAT |
network_name_str |
Revista Esmat |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERGO MODELO DE PROCESSO CIVIL COOPERATIVO COMO INSTRUMENTO DE CONSTRUÇÃO DA DECISÃO JUDICIAL: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DA TEORIA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO MORAL DE LAWRENCE KOHLBERGThe Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 adopted the model of the cooperative process, imposing several procedural duties on the parties. The magistrates, in the exercise of the function of deciding, must render decisions properly justified, as recommended in art. 489, paragraph 1, of CPC/2015. The central problem of the research resided in the following question: at what level of argument is the duty to justify the judicial decisions established by the civil procedural norm? The objective of the research was to analyze the level of argumentation required by the CPC/2015 in light of Lawrence Kohlberg's moral development theory. To achieve such aspiration the method used was the deductive, with bibliographical data research with a qualitative approach. The research carried out had a theoretical focus with exploratory purpose. In the end, it was concluded that, due to the cooperative process model, the duty of justification required by the CPC, especially with regard to art. 489, §1, matches to the post conventional level of the Kohlberg theory.O Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, adotou o modelo do processo cooperativo imprimindo diversos deveres processuais às partes. Aos magistrados, no exercício da função de decidir, cabe proferir decisões adequadamente justificadas, conforme preconiza o art. 489, § 1º, do Código de Processo Civil, de 2015. O problema central da pesquisa residiu no seguinte questionamento: Em qual nível de argumentação encontra-se o dever de fundamentação das decisões judiciais estampadas pela norma processual civil? O objetivo da pesquisa foi analisar o nível de argumentação exigido pelo Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, à luz da teoria do desenvolvimento moral de Lawrence Kohlberg. Para alcançar tal desiderato, o método utilizado foi o dedutivo, com pesquisa de dados bibliográficos com abordagem qualitativa. A pesquisa realizada teve foco teórico com finalidade exploratória. Ao final, concluiu-se que, em decorrência do modelo de processo cooperativo, o dever de fundamentação exigida pelo Código de Processo Civil, em especial quanto ao art. 489, § 1º, enquadra-se no nível de pós-convencionalidade da teoria de Kohlberg.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2019-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/28210.34060/reesmat.v11i18.282ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 11 No. 17 (2019); 39-56REVISTA ESMAT; v. 11 n. 17 (2019); 39-562447-98962177-036010.34060/reesmat.v11i18reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282/238Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMATinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, Vinicius PinheiroBorba, Graziele CoelhoStefany Saboia Pinto, Raabe 2021-10-28T04:14:47Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/282Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2021-10-28T04:14:47Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG O MODELO DE PROCESSO CIVIL COOPERATIVO COMO INSTRUMENTO DE CONSTRUÇÃO DA DECISÃO JUDICIAL: UMA ANÁLISE A PARTIR DA TEORIA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO MORAL DE LAWRENCE KOHLBERG |
title |
THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG |
spellingShingle |
THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG Marques, Vinicius Pinheiro |
title_short |
THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG |
title_full |
THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG |
title_fullStr |
THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG |
title_sort |
THE MODEL OF COOPERATIVE CIVIL PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE MORAL DEVELOPMENT THEORY OF LAWRENCE KOHLBERG |
author |
Marques, Vinicius Pinheiro |
author_facet |
Marques, Vinicius Pinheiro Borba, Graziele Coelho Stefany Saboia Pinto, Raabe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Borba, Graziele Coelho Stefany Saboia Pinto, Raabe |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Vinicius Pinheiro Borba, Graziele Coelho Stefany Saboia Pinto, Raabe |
description |
The Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 adopted the model of the cooperative process, imposing several procedural duties on the parties. The magistrates, in the exercise of the function of deciding, must render decisions properly justified, as recommended in art. 489, paragraph 1, of CPC/2015. The central problem of the research resided in the following question: at what level of argument is the duty to justify the judicial decisions established by the civil procedural norm? The objective of the research was to analyze the level of argumentation required by the CPC/2015 in light of Lawrence Kohlberg's moral development theory. To achieve such aspiration the method used was the deductive, with bibliographical data research with a qualitative approach. The research carried out had a theoretical focus with exploratory purpose. In the end, it was concluded that, due to the cooperative process model, the duty of justification required by the CPC, especially with regard to art. 489, §1, matches to the post conventional level of the Kohlberg theory. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282 10.34060/reesmat.v11i18.282 |
url |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34060/reesmat.v11i18.282 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/282/238 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMAT info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 REVISTA ESMAT |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 11 No. 17 (2019); 39-56 REVISTA ESMAT; v. 11 n. 17 (2019); 39-56 2447-9896 2177-0360 10.34060/reesmat.v11i18 reponame:Revista Esmat instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) instacron:ESMAT |
instname_str |
Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
instacron_str |
ESMAT |
institution |
ESMAT |
reponame_str |
Revista Esmat |
collection |
Revista Esmat |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br |
_version_ |
1809282623224152064 |